13 Comments
 

think Seat-based pricing Co's (ADBE, ZM, DOCU) will struggle as headcount rationalize 30-40% lower. However, outcome/compute/usage based pricing (NOW, SNOW, DDOG) present a compelling case where they can still win, and this drawdown is an attractive entry pt..

curious what others think 

 

Why couldn’t seat-based tools just push price? 

Curious why you think that business model matters more than the use case. 

I’m skeptical that Adobe faces a threat from AI agents. I think it is more likely that they will  integrate AI into their products. I agree this will probably lead to a reduction in seat count, but Adobe can offset that through increased pricing  


 

 
Most Helpful

Depends on comp product pricing, but if your customers are leaving/are on the fence about leaving your product you can’t expect someone to jack up pricing to cover up losses.. that works if you have a sticky base of customers but if you’re talking about 30-40% reduction, someone has to give on either pricing/length of contract to win back or incentivize ppl to not leave. 

 

Lots of companies are moving to value-based or consumption-based pricing. The idea is that a lot of these seat-based players are providing agentic AI solutions that are in-part leading to the replacement for headcount and these software providers want to be compensated for it. Pretty wide-spread trend that isn't leading to as much retention loss as you would think (a lot of these businesses are still at 90%+ gross retention) as it aligns incentives much better. Again speaks to the idea that there will be winners and losers among the current SaaS world; whereas some industries will be completely disrupted by AI-first players and others will be able to adapt / benefit from AI through using AI to increase their value-prop to customers / cross-sell.

 

Iusto pariatur autem nobis suscipit consectetur commodi maxime. Explicabo quod et nulla voluptas necessitatibus ipsum. Laborum repellendus dolore non dolore.

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.0%
  • Citadel Investment Group 97.0%
  • AQR Capital Management 96.0%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.0%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.0%
  • Blackstone Group 97.0%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.0%
  • Two Sigma Investments 94.9%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 98.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.1%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.1%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (27) $464
  • Director/MD (11) $372
  • NA (9) $320
  • Engineer/Quant (83) $287
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (26) $284
  • Manager (4) $282
  • 2nd Year Associate (32) $253
  • 1st Year Associate (76) $193
  • Analysts (233) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (29) $145
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (276) $95
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”