Truly saying, while reading about its bets on different firms it looked like a company plays a very risky game. Some bets went succesful (Alibaba) but some don't (Wirecard, Greensill). It seems like their strategy is to do 10 risky bets and hoping that 1 of these bets will off-set and cover losses made by other ones.

 

Completely wrong. They are the most important and influential tech investor in the game by virtue of their size, and on balance have been very successful thus far. Of course they’ve had many failed bets, often high profile - that’s part of the VC business model. If you want to avoid them because you personally disagree with their investing style, that’s one thing, but make no mistake, they are a market moving fund that could have a role in shaping the sector for years to come. Fundraising is highly competitive and there is a reason they’ve taken in billions from allocators and large tech corporations. Also, this idea that the Saudi and other SWFs are unsophisticated is also hilariously wrong. 

 

They have more failed bets than the typical VC model, is my point. I am not obtuse to not know the risk/reward dynamic of VC as I take part myself. We are in the biggest bull market for tech in history so the returns from SoftBank is laughable on a relative basis.

They are market mover due to their size, given they aggressively sought for unnecessary AUM. There are many more VC funds that could have easily raised just as much but choose not to. Important to not confuse scale like Vanguard vs quality investors like the Tiger Cubs or MM firms. There are great people working for PIF no doubt, but the political interference of MBS and their limited track record makes them sub-par at best.

 

Omnis deserunt quaerat impedit qui molestiae et. Consequatur et et in voluptates. Sed excepturi dicta vel quasi maxime. Et sit quasi voluptatum minus sunt inventore. Eius doloribus libero velit rem. Eos eos reprehenderit suscipit id ut aut.

Corporis incidunt officia labore tempora. Possimus aut tenetur quisquam minus. Amet dolore aut accusamus doloremque et. Alias voluptatem rerum enim earum doloribus consectetur voluptas dignissimos. Est recusandae vel rem.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.9%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.8%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.8%
  • AQR Capital Management 94.7%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.8%
  • Blackstone Group 96.8%
  • Two Sigma Investments 95.7%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.6%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 97.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 96.9%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.8%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.8%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (23) $474
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (6) $322
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (24) $287
  • Manager (4) $282
  • Engineer/Quant (71) $274
  • 2nd Year Associate (30) $251
  • 1st Year Associate (73) $190
  • Analysts (225) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (22) $131
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (250) $85
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”