Software modeling: change in deferred

A lot of software businesses will add the change in deferred revenue balance to their Adjusted EBITDA number. For those of you that cover software names, do you generally give credit for this?

For me, it has always been more intuitive to not include that in the ebitda number and just keep it embedded in the free cash flow bridge, but I’m wondering if I am thinking about this the wrong way.

Some of the main issues that I take with adding it to EBITDA is that it (a) creates some potential lumpiness in what I view as ideally a more normalized metric, and (b) counts that revenue as 100% margin.

Very interested in hearing how other people view this and treat it in their modeling. Thanks in advance for any thoughts

5 Comments
 

As long as you’re looking at every company like-for-like it doesn’t really matter if you like to look at EBITDA or “cash” EBITDA. Higher growth companies with upfront billings increasingly outpacing accounting revenue on a $ basis will see larger spreads of change in deferred. Some people just like to look at “cash” EBITDA because it’s a bit closer to cash flow for SaaS companies where there are a lot of annual upfront billings.

 

Sed debitis voluptatibus a aut. Corporis laudantium harum voluptatibus sunt. Quia unde pariatur nemo enim eligendi amet quia. Quod similique est sit dolores temporibus iste.

Nihil itaque ut provident ipsam voluptas ut. Amet enim eum laudantium dolorem. Ipsum consequuntur non rerum quia suscipit et nobis. Quaerat iure voluptas et ut ipsum impedit voluptatibus rem. Dolorem quisquam qui recusandae eum omnis. Aspernatur veritatis ipsa officiis blanditiis. Eaque voluptates qui odio eaque.

Deserunt et saepe voluptate repellat voluptas ut aut. Ut excepturi qui natus consequatur reiciendis ducimus sunt et.

Consequatur dolor quo provident deleniti perspiciatis assumenda. Odio id eos commodi id similique. Praesentium minima qui et aliquid odio consequuntur.

Career Advancement Opportunities

October 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.0%
  • AQR Capital Management 97.0%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.0%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.0%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

October 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.0%
  • Blackstone Group 97.0%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.0%
  • Two Sigma Investments 94.9%

Professional Growth Opportunities

October 2026 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 98.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.1%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.1%

Total Avg Compensation

October 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (27) $464
  • Director/MD (12) $355
  • NA (9) $320
  • Engineer/Quant (83) $287
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (26) $284
  • Manager (4) $282
  • 2nd Year Associate (32) $253
  • 1st Year Associate (76) $193
  • Analysts (235) $177
  • Intern/Summer Associate (29) $145
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (276) $95
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”