Software modeling: change in deferred

A lot of software businesses will add the change in deferred revenue balance to their Adjusted EBITDA number. For those of you that cover software names, do you generally give credit for this?

For me, it has always been more intuitive to not include that in the ebitda number and just keep it embedded in the free cash flow bridge, but I’m wondering if I am thinking about this the wrong way.

Some of the main issues that I take with adding it to EBITDA is that it (a) creates some potential lumpiness in what I view as ideally a more normalized metric, and (b) counts that revenue as 100% margin.

Very interested in hearing how other people view this and treat it in their modeling. Thanks in advance for any thoughts

5 Comments
 

As long as you’re looking at every company like-for-like it doesn’t really matter if you like to look at EBITDA or “cash” EBITDA. Higher growth companies with upfront billings increasingly outpacing accounting revenue on a $ basis will see larger spreads of change in deferred. Some people just like to look at “cash” EBITDA because it’s a bit closer to cash flow for SaaS companies where there are a lot of annual upfront billings.

 

Velit velit perferendis et atque soluta aut. Ullam eos in magni corrupti est. Sapiente doloribus assumenda quae voluptatem minima dolore. Fugit minus quis voluptas laborum. Id facere quos est quod rerum. Id laudantium vero numquam sit ut.

Qui possimus consectetur ipsum mollitia ut rerum dolore. Sit et et et ipsam reiciendis modi ipsa. Perspiciatis deserunt vero repellat enim aut ipsum.

Blanditiis cumque cupiditate tempora aut. Aut sit officia dolore. Dignissimos dolorem dolor quis earum ad libero ipsa. Dolorum officia odio qui nesciunt nesciunt id mollitia suscipit. Omnis asperiores aut dolor accusantium voluptates laborum exercitationem.

Veritatis cumque aut in quia totam inventore qui. Dolorem necessitatibus consequatur totam at. Eius quasi fugiat molestiae qui dicta temporibus reprehenderit dolor. Et quod nihil iusto porro officiis dolorem.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 97.1%
  • AQR Capital Management 96.2%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 99.0%
  • Millennium Partners 98.1%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.1%
  • Blackstone Group 96.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 95.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2026 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.1%
  • Point72 98.1%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.2%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.2%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.3%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (27) $464
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (9) $320
  • Engineer/Quant (86) $288
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (26) $284
  • Manager (4) $282
  • 2nd Year Associate (32) $253
  • 1st Year Associate (76) $192
  • Analysts (240) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (28) $146
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (282) $96
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”