Software modeling: change in deferred

A lot of software businesses will add the change in deferred revenue balance to their Adjusted EBITDA number. For those of you that cover software names, do you generally give credit for this?

For me, it has always been more intuitive to not include that in the ebitda number and just keep it embedded in the free cash flow bridge, but I’m wondering if I am thinking about this the wrong way.

Some of the main issues that I take with adding it to EBITDA is that it (a) creates some potential lumpiness in what I view as ideally a more normalized metric, and (b) counts that revenue as 100% margin.

Very interested in hearing how other people view this and treat it in their modeling. Thanks in advance for any thoughts

 

At the fund I work for we give no credit to EBITDA at all, usually evaluate EBITDA - CapEx, as many companies are capitalizing R&D instead of expensing. That said, deferred should not impact EBITDA in my view and I treat it as an important CF item if recurrent

 

As long as you’re looking at every company like-for-like it doesn’t really matter if you like to look at EBITDA or “cash” EBITDA. Higher growth companies with upfront billings increasingly outpacing accounting revenue on a $ basis will see larger spreads of change in deferred. Some people just like to look at “cash” EBITDA because it’s a bit closer to cash flow for SaaS companies where there are a lot of annual upfront billings.

 

Dolore distinctio nisi eos et. Rem quibusdam reiciendis doloremque culpa optio voluptatem expedita id. Qui dolorum necessitatibus dolores ut ut consequatur. Aperiam ea cum velit odit. Doloribus eum est est temporibus dolores.

Labore alias enim sed dolore esse. Ut molestiae nostrum ut exercitationem. Unde quas rerum modi quam. Non incidunt porro sint quasi reprehenderit laudantium et sit.

Quisquam aperiam incidunt in vel enim voluptatem sed. Ipsum soluta nihil in et quam. Sint omnis molestias eos. Est repellat doloremque excepturi libero. Est voluptatibus qui voluptates quam. Autem repudiandae ea consequatur quis cum.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.9%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.8%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.8%
  • AQR Capital Management 94.7%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.8%
  • Blackstone Group 96.8%
  • Two Sigma Investments 95.7%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.6%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 97.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 96.9%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.8%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.8%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (23) $474
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (6) $322
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (24) $287
  • Manager (4) $282
  • Engineer/Quant (71) $274
  • 2nd Year Associate (30) $251
  • 1st Year Associate (73) $190
  • Analysts (225) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (22) $131
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (250) $85
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”