Thesis for 500 percent gain in stocks in next 5 years

Where do you think QQQ will be in the next five years?

Not being equity focused in my professional life and looking from the sidelines, it appears to me that stocks have shown tremendous amount of resilience over the past few years. QQQ has gained 80 percent since Jan 2020, and that occured during the a terrible pandemic and war in Europe.

From my prospective as a naive investor, was it not for those macro factors, the potential gains could have been significantly higher (think 200-300 pct over 3 year span, which roughly translates to 500 percent in 5 years). Does that set a bullish tone for the next five years? With the recent invention of large language models and AI and concentration into larger companies, can we see big gains for the next five years in any reasonable base case scenario?

 

I am somewhat of an optimist, but come on you cannot think 2020 was a fantastic year hampered by COVID. That is not true, COVID helped immensely with an astonishing level of QE much higher than 2008 (for something that was a hot taboo 15 years ago, quite impressive). We had a massive asset bubble for crying out loud, just look at 2020-2022. Currently we may have higher interest rates for longer. Besides, rates were artificially low, we probably won’t see that again for quite some time.

Anyway, why not 600, 800, 1000%? Where are you getting the 500% growth in 5 years? 500% growth is 49.5% CAGR. This is a mind-boggling assumption. QQQ has never even managed 50% back-to-back. QQQ performance: 1y = 30.21%, 3y = 14.83%, 5y = 17.41%.

 
Most Helpful

I generally think these long term forecasts are kind of useless and aren't great predictors, but I'll throw in some comments on general stuff I have thought about "big picture" wise. 

Lets take an even bigger step back here and think about the environments that have been conducive to equity market returns, and reverse back to the beginning of the 1980s. Starting point was low valuations, high inflation/real rates, high taxes, high regulations, low corporate margins, low leverage, low levels of population invested in equities, the beginning of a massive push towards favorable capitalistic policies (Reagan), increase in globalization, end of cold war, etc. What followed was an amazing expansion in prosperity and equity market returns, probably annualized around 8-9% through 2020 or something.  

Flash forward to today's starting point: high valuations (somewhat), low interest rates/inflation (relatively), rising taxes, increasing regulation, record high margins, higher levels of leverage, higher % of individuals invested in equities, increasing anti-capitalistic sentiment, increasing de-globalization / re-globalization (kind of offsets?) + increasing geopolitical tensions. Also record levels of government debt. Generally, seems like a tougher makeup for the long term expected equity market returns and economy in general. I am broadly generalizing here, but just some stuff to think about. 

When taking a closer look, the biggest conversation is really around what the future normalized rate environment looks like, as we had years of basically near zero rates subsidizing equity investments and cheap debt. On top of that, per the other poster, an extremely accommodative policy in 2020 subsidized massive amounts spending and drove up demand - all of this is finally unwinding. Yes there is also a lot of narrowness in the markets, but the other side is that the leading companies today (top 10 market cap businesses) are exceptionally strong and resilient, and generate a tremendous amount of cash flow - this isn't 2000 where no one knew how these businesses would monetize the internet. The AI part is a mix of both reality and speculation/fantasy, and its still quite early to determine everything here. 

I don't have great conviction one way or another as there are a lot of puts and takes, but I think it would be incorrect to characterize today as a continuation of the dynamics we saw pre COVID and immediately following COVID. As such I can only offer some trite conclusions. History doesn't repeat itself, but it tends to rhyme. We are probably entering the cusp of a new market environment/paradigm, and it would be imprudent to assume that assets + the markets will behave like they have over the last few years/decade. 

 

If AI is part fantacy and it's too early to know its real effect on businesses, that appears to me to be a major risk to equities going forward. Think of MSFT etc adding $1T in market cap and seeing massive multiple expansions, that has to be due to a clear roadmap to significant revenue streams, otherwise it's 2000 all over again?

 

This pretty much sums up this entire forum. Despite being full of "finance professionals," they all have the same opinions as random anon retail accounts on Twitter. Everyone was extremely bearish on here 6 months ago trying to rationalize their bearishness with recent data on inflation, earnings, yield, margins, etc as if that's how the market operates at all. Sentiment and positioning...

 

This pretty much sums up this entire forum. Despite being full of "finance professionals," they all have the same opinions as random anon retail accounts on Twitter. Everyone was extremely bearish on here 6 months ago trying to rationalize their bearishness with recent data on inflation, earnings, yield, margins, etc as if that's how the market operates at all. Sentiment and positioning...

I have been in the industry long enough to know that anybody who claims to understand how the market operates, lacks a basic understanding of probabilities and randomness. Randomness is a very tough thing to get.

 

If you think the QQQ will yield a 50% CAGR in the next 5 years, when it has NEVER yielded that in its history, and the extremely high probability we may not see an artificially low interest rate environment + high cash in circulation scenario, this isn’t being bullish, it is being delusional.

It very well could, but it is extremely unlikely. I am not dissing bullishness, I am dissing the absurd projection that was based on nothing more than liking the number 500.

Anyway, you’re simply generalizing all negative comments. I wasn’t even here 6 months ago, and even I said the same tune, guess what? This projection is still BS given current data

 

Too many people rely on multiples - I am a strong believer in forecasting cash flows far out, while they are no doubt going to be mostly wrong, it forces you to think of the business and the many different levers / understand your own assumptions. But by doing so, you can establish confidence intervals where you think value lies, rather than blindly saying something is cheap or expensive relative to history, which can be a problem in different regime changes. 

 

You will never see another move like the one after COVID, ever. That is, unless the government makes interest rates 0% and prints a f*ck load of free money for people to put the economy on steroids again.

AI and these new language models are good catalysts and will make companies innovative but they won’t make Apple or Microsoft go 500%

Indexes/ETFs like the QQQ and SPX do not accurately represent the performance of the stock market since a majority of the returns are derived from the “magnificent 7.”

 

Quos et corporis consequatur ab tempore alias repellendus accusamus. Optio placeat molestiae totam similique iure exercitationem.

Assumenda sed tempore aut omnis dolorem nobis. Est qui dolorum in aut voluptate eveniet est ut. Quaerat mollitia asperiores dolore vel eum.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.9%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.8%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.8%
  • AQR Capital Management 94.7%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.8%
  • Blackstone Group 96.8%
  • Two Sigma Investments 95.7%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.6%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 97.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 96.9%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.8%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.8%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (23) $474
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (6) $322
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (24) $287
  • Manager (4) $282
  • Engineer/Quant (71) $274
  • 2nd Year Associate (30) $251
  • 1st Year Associate (73) $190
  • Analysts (225) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (23) $131
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (250) $85
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”