Why do people leave event-driven hedge funds for L/S funds?
Is it the pay, upside? Seems like a completely different vibe. Seen people go Silver Point/Anchorage/King Street to Tiger Cubs.
Trending Content - Hedge Fund Forum
Career Resources
I don't think its as common as your might think.
Curious as well about this.. See a lot of Silver Point people leave for L/S funds especially
Culture is brutal there.
As a close friend who left SPC told me: "no one likes working at SPC, literally no one"
Seems like hyperbole. I know several analysts that are content there. Some of the undergrad hires burn out quickly though.
UGs love to pretend like working at the most prestigious job out of Wharton somehow offsets how much it sucks working at SPC.
Ask Prat how much she liked it, lol.
It's definitely easy to get a bit of grass is greener mentality when you see folks at tiger cubs kill it picking FAANG or consumer/tech names simply because they like it or see long term growth.
Event driven / distress is fun but the capacity for stress/complexity and resources it takes getting into these hairy situations sometimes just doesn't feel worth it.
Agree with the above my first thought was “..This isnt happening much”
Possible reasons
Tiger cubs pay more than anchorage, SPC, king street? Thought top event driven and distressed funds paid more than the tiger cubs / grandcubs...
I more listed that as a potential reason as in it could potentially pay more, it is too dependent on fund to say across the board better or worse.
In terms of all in potential / career trajectory (launching your own fund down the line) I would say yes if you are at one of the top tiger funds.
Something happens and they are ‘event-driven’ to change careers
After a while, they probably run dry of catalysts insights because they no longer have valuable info on what deals were in the pipeline (at least in the bank they worked at? Who knows.
Until you've worked at a real HF, you don't understand the pressure. Its way more brutal in banking, and most of PE.
Teams are small, politics (sure, your results are evident but its about how you present your thought process and is it repeatable), and people get F'd on bonuses all the time since there's no HR and you'll just have the next monkey replace you.
Did you mean "more brutal than in banking and most of PE"? And what do you define as a real HF?
This (kind of). And it's just not for funds in which everyone reports to CIO/PM with ideas. It's similar (in a sense) to multi-manager and more trading oriented places.
Why? You PnL is daily, marked to market and evident for bossman to see. In many strategies there is a lot of leverage as well. The numbers move. Every. Single. Second. Your PnL changes as a result. You can be canned any minute. At any time based on that.
There is also your boss or the head PM/CIO etc who can be prone to questioning every judgement call you/your boss make.
SPX up 20%? He might say "I saw that move coming, anyone could have.. you weren't long enough." SPX down 15? "Obvious short. How did you not catch that. How did you not move the book around?"
If you said "Hey dude why didn't you do those trades?"
You get the old
"Hey I'm just the manager. I'm not going to do your job for you."
Things going bad with your pod/desk/team? Hopefully your boss doesn't blame and can you (to save his own skin).
This is not to say that banking or PE/illiquids don't have their own stress. They do. And they are just of a different kind. At the senior level guys in HFs can and still should worry about their books all the time. At a senior level in PE, guys SEEM a lot more sanguine. It may be their being polished and better presenters, but it also may be the fact that the capital is locked up, the fee stream is an annuity and they don't have to MTM daily.
Different mentality. Different characters. Different kinds of stress...
What personality suits PE/ IB better and personality suits HF/ S&T more? How do you deal with months or quarters of downward performance? Every day/ month is filled with some sort of stress or insecurity. How do you deal with this?
THIS is why you should join a HF that holds investments for long investment horizons with the investment thesis spanning years, and are judged over a 2-5 year period, not just based on quarters, etc.
It's RARE to find Hedge funds that do this successfully, but there some out there if you look hard enough
How easy is the switch / case to switch from distressed HF to one of the tiger cub like funds. Do HHs silo you into a distressed guy or do PMs / interviewers at the funds view you as someone who has developed a specific mindset which makes it harder to jump?
bump, especially if early in career?
Eos exercitationem beatae occaecati id nihil error. Dolorem sunt rerum fuga facere eos incidunt maiores. Repellendus dolorem autem laboriosam qui dolorem. Voluptas voluptatem iste et ut sint.
Cum natus necessitatibus qui tempore. Laborum quia minima quasi. Dolor laboriosam sed rerum doloremque voluptas commodi. Voluptas nostrum in eaque pariatur voluptas. Laborum rerum velit totam et. Consequatur eos rem nihil deleniti eos. Fugiat mollitia ad rerum consectetur doloribus omnis vitae.
Rerum pariatur optio ducimus. Eum dolorum totam unde veniam. Id non natus et reiciendis veritatis animi.
Distinctio aliquid quia omnis. Qui quia cum corrupti cum. Quo suscipit aliquam minus vel sit occaecati.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Mollitia maiores sint incidunt aut. Autem et alias eius sit natus deleniti et. Repudiandae quo qui esse possimus quia rerum. Minima temporibus ullam sit temporibus laudantium. Rerum optio temporibus tempore et quibusdam facilis ipsum.