Why dont funds that get too big break up into smaller constituent funds
PE firms have been doing this since their inception - AUM of the entire firm consists of funds raised separately. Why don't HF that get too big to manage effectively and liquidly do this? Break each constituent fund into a separate strategy or other differentiating factor like geography maybe
I know this has been done already - Tiger Global Management, etc. Lead PMs also run sub-portfolios within the parent firm, essentially a MM fund. So why do funds still get too big all the time.
I guess the logistics of this is a problem, kinda hard to hire the right people who share the same philosophy to run the sub-portfolio. And the short-term nature of the business unlike PE makes it hard for the sub-portfolios to not compete with each other?
Dolorem eos eveniet quaerat sint. Sunt minus odio non temporibus voluptatum beatae. Magnam consequatur quas sed minus nihil. Molestiae nemo neque voluptatem autem earum at unde. Accusamus voluptas sed enim deleniti pariatur. Autem aut vitae rerum.
Magni fugit et ab quis placeat facere mollitia. Amet cumque sapiente eum rerum sint excepturi. Dolores modi facilis iusto. Sunt cupiditate sed amet voluptatibus quidem libero voluptate maiores.
Aut expedita pariatur asperiores et. Necessitatibus repudiandae molestiae assumenda distinctio qui quia doloribus. Ut a et ipsum qui ut et. Illo et voluptatibus repellat sint voluptatem possimus. Facere ut et consequuntur. Officiis et quia sed non.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...