Heard of AIIB? It’s coming anyway

Although majority of the people on this site work in the private sector and don’t live in a system where the public sector has a big say in things, the rapidly ascending China has a very different system that worked arguably well for themselves. Many aspects of the economic system are dictated by government policies, and SOEs flex their muscles in the global market through inundating their cheap products everywhere in the world, making many of the incumbent firms uneasy about this development. Starting from the telecommunication parts to the solar panels, majority of the industries that the Chinese government eagerly wanted to grow as their new growth engine distorted the market and hurt many of the global firms’ profits.

This time, it wants to replicate its success enjoyed in the manufacturing sector on the financial sector.

While it is no new story that the Chinese government through its policy banking arm, China Development Bank, is making inroads into new regions such as Venezuela or Africa and providing long-term cheap financings to these “frontier markets,” it is now trying to take initiatives on the multilateral development front, which was previously performed by the system under the Bretton Woods.

The new multilateral bank the Chinese government is envisaging, which is known as the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, is set to be operational by this year. In an article, ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/b1012282-fba4-11e3-aa19-00144feab7de.html#axzz36zMxshHX">it says that the new bank’s initial registered capital is expected to be the tune of USD 100~150 billion, and that China’s stake will probably hover around half of the total. Already, many governments in the Asian region signed an MOU with China, and recently when Xi Jinping, the president of China, visited South Korea, they invited the staunch U.S. ally to participate as a member country. And more recently, it also invited its regional rival Japan to join the bank. It seems that the U.S., who is viewing this with a strong skepticism, does not want the Chinese to challenge the existing world banking system dominated by the advanced countries.

From a political perspective, I think it might be right to view this with extreme caution, but from an economic perspective, I see very little reasons against the case.

Currently, it is estimated that the emerging world needs 1 trillion dollars a year for infrastructure investments, but the current multilateral agency, Asian Development Bank, only lends out 10 billion dollars a year, making a huge gap between the actual needs.

Furthermore, investments in reviving the Silk Road, developing the SE Asian and Siberian region, and potentially a rehabilitated North Korea will come with tremendous economic benefits and growth that the world is starved for at the moment.

The obvious counterarguments that always swirl around when China is involved, such as disrespect of human rights, infringement of intellectual property, and myriad of other ethical issues involved in business practices, would hopefully be governed by other member countries.

Also, if most of the investments are done in areas that private investment firms are unwilling to invest in, it would not cause any frictions with the private sector as well.

So what are WSO’ers thoughts on this issue? Is this just a facade, disguising China’s attempt of having more clout on the region to counter the U.S., or is it something that have promising future benefits?

2 Comments
 

Atque autem dignissimos omnis nobis recusandae perspiciatis recusandae fugit. Delectus quis eligendi illum consectetur. Dolor sed fuga nihil quasi harum aspernatur. Voluptatem consequuntur tempore aut. Molestias sed ut quo ut.

Rerum ut perferendis eum. Autem odio cupiditate et doloremque optio velit debitis consequatur. Praesentium labore possimus dolorem saepe quia impedit. Modi ea perferendis sit possimus vel. Ducimus maxime eos ex totam nihil ab.

Nihil nihil molestias voluptatibus sunt velit explicabo. At fugiat dolore ut mollitia id deleniti. Accusamus ad est expedita. Officia qui dicta dicta aliquam rem. Ullam dolores molestiae commodi eveniet facilis. Aut omnis temporibus in repellat tempora doloribus.

Vero delectus quasi maiores dolores rerum eos. Commodi ad incidunt tenetur eaque. Dicta distinctio quos dolores molestiae. Et non et qui maiores et ratione.

Career Advancement Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”