A company has a high debt load and is paying off a sig. portion of its principal each yr. How does it affect DCF?

dumb question here: I know it won't affect the unleveled FCF. But how about its WACC? The principal goes down, proportion of debt will go down. Will WACC change in this case as well? The guide didn't cover this part. Am I thinking too much?

11 Comments
 
NYCbandarIf you assume debt is cheaper than equity, WACC will go up. Think about paying off principal - you're using cash (asset) to pay off debt (liability). Your balance sheet decreases in size, with the debt portion of the capital structure eating the whole decrease. This increases the ratio of equity:debt. Understand?

No you're not thinking hard enough.

I'm just kidding.

But seriously.

Wacc will not necessarily go up. As the percentage of debt in the capital structure decreases, the cost of equity decreases. If there was too much debt in the capital structure, paying some of it (to a certain level) may make the wacc go down.

 
J.T.
NYCbandarIf you assume debt is cheaper than equity, WACC will go up. Think about paying off principal - you're using cash (asset) to pay off debt (liability). Your balance sheet decreases in size, with the debt portion of the capital structure eating the whole decrease. This increases the ratio of equity:debt. Understand?

No you're not thinking hard enough.

I'm just kidding.

But seriously.

Wacc will not necessarily go up. As the percentage of debt in the capital structure decreases, the cost of equity decreases. If there was too much debt in the capital structure, paying some of it (to a certain level) may make the wacc go down.

Is this not what I said in my next comment? The simple answer is, in normal circumstances, i.e., debt is cheaper than equity, no financial distress, WACC will go up. If you assume a "weird" situation, this isn't always the case.

dg100wacc is based on the optimal capital structure... paying of the debt shouldn't effect that.. hence should the wacc be unchanged.

No.

jack_donaghyIf you assume that a company isn't in financial distress, and the cost of equity is higher than the cost of debt, then your WACC will increase as the capital structure changes. The big impact will be the interest tax shield up front, just like an LBO. As your debt level decreases, your interest tax shield will decline. In order to to capture the effect of the change in capital stucture, you'll have to re-weight your WACC every period of your model.

Yes.

pikachuso WACC goes up through the lifetime of an LBO investment?

Normally it will because usually in LBOs you lever up to buy the company and than use it's cash flow to pay down debt. Over the lifetime of the LBO the ratio of debt to equity falls, and as the above poster said, your interest tax shield declines.

 
Best Response

Although, if you get asked this in an interview and want to come off as extra sharp, I would say what I just said, but with the caveat that it matters just how high the debt load is. Like, WACC is generally calculated using market prices not cost, so if the company's debt load is so high that people don't necessarily believe in it's ability to pay it back, it's possible that paying down a bit of principle will make the rest of your debt trade at higher levels, which reduces the cost of debt, which would reduce WACC. I suppose you could say that would already be priced into the cost of equity (obviously if the debt holders don't get paid back equity is wiped out so the equity will trade at a discount if this is considered likely) but I don't think most people believe equity markets are perfect. This is just me talking now.

This is a pretty rare situation though, the first answer I gave is the textbook "correct" answer, the second is just more shit to be aware of.

 

wacc is based on the optimal capital structure... paying of the debt shouldn't effect that.. hence should the wacc be unchanged.

 

If you assume that a company isn't in financial distress, and the cost of equity is higher than the cost of debt, then your WACC will increase as the capital structure changes. The big impact will be the interest tax shield up front, just like an LBO. As your debt level decreases, your interest tax shield will decline. In order to to capture the effect of the change in capital stucture, you'll have to re-weight your WACC every period of your model.

 

Qui maiores velit rerum aliquam nulla et. Voluptatem necessitatibus ipsum explicabo id voluptas. Deserunt consequuntur non quia illum fugit. Sed a non sit fuga blanditiis ratione. Et unde minus eligendi consequatur et facilis voluptate. Ad consequuntur explicabo et rerum eius tempore quia sint.

Officia eius laborum libero a id. Fugiat eligendi reiciendis molestias rerum omnis rerum enim. Animi dolorem quis eum aperiam sed ipsa tempora. Provident vitae quia similique quisquam molestiae non esse quis. Dignissimos blanditiis voluptatibus exercitationem ratione modi error. Asperiores similique iusto est ea reiciendis aliquam.

Architecto quo non aut accusamus. Molestiae recusandae error rerum id. Illo occaecati sit cum ipsam est eos. Incidunt et nemo non ullam.

Valor is of no service, chance rules all, and the bravest often fall by the hands of cowards. - Tacitus Dr. Nick Riviera: Hey, don't worry. You don't have to make up stories here. Save that for court!

Career Advancement Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”