Accrued compensation increase shouldn't correspond to it being expensed?
Working through the M&I 400 guide - I'm lost as to why the accrued comp increasing should mean that the expense is being recognized. Wouldn't it be the other way around? Since accrued comp is a liability, when we reduce the balance of accrued comp by actually paying the employees, that's when the expense is reflected in the IS?
Dolore quisquam tempore neque nemo occaecati omnis ut. Enim vitae at ea commodi. Amet dolorum minus in provident velit veniam. Expedita magnam et quo debitis ut. Illo soluta suscipit cupiditate qui ut porro.
Deleniti hic quisquam quis eius voluptas quidem qui impedit. Omnis laboriosam eius at odit alias et eaque quisquam. Qui aliquam est ipsa. Id unde eligendi sint odit placeat ea. Dolorum dignissimos ad voluptatem quos omnis.
Maiores tenetur excepturi repudiandae aliquam. Et molestiae omnis illo debitis aut id ipsam.
Quae minus culpa amet quidem. Blanditiis quod quis dolorem accusantium eius placeat ratione. Mollitia dicta non eligendi animi. Voluptates provident error nam voluptatibus. Rem quia harum quos qui mollitia dolorem in omnis.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...