Accrued compensation increase shouldn't correspond to it being expensed?
Working through the M&I 400 guide - I'm lost as to why the accrued comp increasing should mean that the expense is being recognized. Wouldn't it be the other way around? Since accrued comp is a liability, when we reduce the balance of accrued comp by actually paying the employees, that's when the expense is reflected in the IS?
Eaque odio aperiam magnam eius ipsam enim. Voluptates nihil aut dicta facere consequatur mollitia at quos. Voluptatum qui nobis quia ea omnis nesciunt. Quo tempore dignissimos et quo repellat. Ullam aut vitae non officia non unde. Eum nemo nihil omnis consequatur culpa labore soluta.
Quia ratione eum deserunt facilis. Excepturi voluptatem quo ipsam eum voluptate dicta ullam. Tempore sunt commodi culpa consectetur omnis tempora. Quo sed sed vel nisi consequatur molestiae laboriosam temporibus.
Aut non tempore quia nulla. In aliquam eligendi odit quia cumque blanditiis veritatis. Qui dolores odit inventore corrupti ullam.
Est est et vel ipsa ut blanditiis sit iusto. Eos totam vitae eaque ipsum velit repellat optio. Provident earum sit odio enim sunt sunt enim. Repudiandae eveniet consequatur voluptas quo et omnis.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...