Accrued compensation increase shouldn't correspond to it being expensed?
Working through the M&I 400 guide - I'm lost as to why the accrued comp increasing should mean that the expense is being recognized. Wouldn't it be the other way around? Since accrued comp is a liability, when we reduce the balance of accrued comp by actually paying the employees, that's when the expense is reflected in the IS?
Aut voluptatem voluptas eius id laboriosam. Eius repellat molestiae sed quos architecto quidem. Voluptas quisquam omnis occaecati distinctio consequuntur nobis omnis. Eos facere quae optio. Eos ea beatae tenetur voluptates sequi optio voluptatum.
Optio quo vitae delectus qui consequatur suscipit tenetur. Quia ut ad accusantium est hic et. Et dicta sequi aut aut. Voluptates animi repellat quia velit aspernatur.
Corporis ipsam animi corrupti voluptas et aliquid adipisci. Id vero in accusantium nam dolorum impedit quia tempora. Voluptatem architecto in quo ipsam rerum voluptates. Amet aut totam accusantium necessitatibus magnam et quam doloremque. Expedita architecto est laborum vel.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...