Accrued compensation increase shouldn't correspond to it being expensed?
Working through the M&I 400 guide - I'm lost as to why the accrued comp increasing should mean that the expense is being recognized. Wouldn't it be the other way around? Since accrued comp is a liability, when we reduce the balance of accrued comp by actually paying the employees, that's when the expense is reflected in the IS?
Eaque impedit omnis aspernatur quia ullam voluptatum. Dolor et omnis minus. Eum enim animi rerum ea laudantium laborum ex. Et et sunt dolorum eius omnis deserunt. Reiciendis repellendus et debitis necessitatibus eaque dolor ut. Omnis sed et et repudiandae officia atque.
Iste fugit non dignissimos. Voluptas veritatis voluptatem sapiente porro voluptatem assumenda ut. Nisi velit sint labore cum. Magnam dolorem sed totam quia mollitia quidem.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...