Africa in 2100: ECONOMIC POWERHOUSE or SHITHOLE?

Africa is projected to have 4.5 billion people by 2100, with countries like Nigeria expected to have 752 million people (more than the population of Europe today) and countries like the Democratic People's Republic of the Congo are expected to have 389 million people by that time. In 2100, the world's largest cities are projected to be

Population (2100) City Country

1 88.3 million Lagos Nigeria 2 83.5 million Kinshasa DRC 3 73.7 million Dar Es Salaam Tanzania 4 67.2 million Mumbai India 5 57.3 million Delhi India 6 56.6 million Khartoum Sudan 7 56.1 million Niamey Niger 8 54.3 million Dhaka Bangladesh 9 52.4 million Kolkata India 10 50.3 million Kabul Afghanistan

How do dirt poor countries like the DRC build the necessary infrastructure to have a functioning megacity and not have terrible air pollution? In Mumbai or Lagos right now, traffic and pollution is already terrible, how can these cities deal with an influx of new people? Will these giant megacities end up as ECONOMIC POWERHOUSES or SHITHOLES?

50 Comments
 

It may curve in population, birth rates are already going down in several of those countries.

If these countries get more modernized and introduced to advanced contraception while breaking away from the tradition of having 6 kids, it will curve. (I heard Bill Gates was delivering condoms to them with drones)

If not, I guess learn French and English instead of Chinese for future language.

 
Most Helpful

This sounds about right. With China's wages increasing, and ASEAN countries developing more, Africa will provide cheap labor and natural resources, while China will provide lots of capital with strings attached. Interesting statistic of the day- there are currently more than 60,000 African students studying in China for university while there are 37,000 in the US. Long term prediction - with China bolstering their universities and luring top STEM students with scholarships, China could drain the continent's brain power as well. I also think that some countries in Africa might go "full China" and impose their own technocratic totalitarian regime with free markets AND it will probably work. Look no further than Paul Kagame and Rwanda - despite being a brutal dictator, he has turned Rwanda from being a wartorn hellhole into one of the best countries in Africa with a burgeoning tourism industry in two decades.

 

This is why US should definitely stand up to China and see China as not as a friend, China could challenge the ruled-based order established by the US and export its authoritarianism. I think many African countries have too much corruption problems, they're taking Chinese money but overdrafting their future

 
  1. Trump's trade war are forcing many foreign companies to leave China and relocate their factories to Vietnam, Taiwan, India, and even Chinese companies are doing so. You can look at Q3 GDP growth for those countries, especially TW, the highest among Dragon Four, its exports to the US broke the records this year as well. This causes China's FDI to quickly vanish, and millions of people are becoming unemployed everywhere in China, considering Chinese economy replies heavily on exports and manufactures.
  2. Chinese debt-GDP ratio. (around 2) In the past year, more than 400+ real estate companies filed bankrupcy. Real estate makes up about 60% of Chinese GDP, and due to the economic slowdown, their fiancial chain broke, causing rippling problems in the entire economy. Because if this, the government issued policies to deleverage and this led to more collapse within the private sector.
  3. Structure of Chinese economy, China's economy is mainly made up of public sector which is highly inefficient and is in lots of debt while the private sector is responsible for more than 60% employment but is discriminated against. It's very hard for them to get debts and the tax is very high. Now China's economy has serious stagnation and inflation problem. (pork price skyrocketed etc) but what the gov has been doing is to decrease interest rate and injecting liquidity into the market (Chinese M2 is twice larger than its GDP while that of the U.S. is around 0.8. China's M2 growth has been extremely high in the past decades) which does not have any effect anymore. I think the only way out is to decrease tax and conduct what Trump said "structural reform" but obv the gov refused bc that way it would destablize the politics.
  4. Hong Kong. HK is irreplaceable for China but now the future of this oriental pearl is uncertain, its international financial center status is being ruined. These are my own opinions tho lol
 

1) I think this is overblown. China trades with other countries besides the US and is strengthing trade agreements with other countries while we're not looking. Yes, they're hurting a bit, yes I'm long Vietnam and Taiwan atm but even with tariffs China still offers the best value of existing infrastructure and supply chain with lower wages for high skilled manufacturing.
2) agree 100%, and the corporate debt/GDP is high as fuck. Real estate in China is a huge bubble cluster fuck (in part due to capital outflow controls leading to people stashing their money in real estate, in part due to cultural saving and investing trends, in part due to the hugely uneven ratio of males to females and guys needing to own 2-3 apartments to be marriable, in part due to a cluster fuck of other factors) , but urbanization trends are still continuing and I don't think that the bubble will pop any time soon. I think this is what will ultimately lead to China's next recession. 3) The private sector accounts for 80 percent of urban jobs, that's where the growth is. I think the Chinese government recognizes that it needs more private enterprises to grow the economy. Will bloated SOEs lead to a big recession? I don't think so right now, but they will need to figure this out while they still can.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”