Annualized Expected Return
Two formulas:
Annualized Expected Return = (Gross Spread/ Investment)*(360/ Inv. Period)
versus.
Annual Return = (ending value/beginning value)^(1/# of years) - 1
Which one is the appropriate one to use when comparing returns across asset classes? I understand that the top one does not incorporate compounding, while the bottom one does.
http://itswhatyoukeep.hubpages.com/hub/Geometric-vs-Arithmetic-Rate-of-…
[quote=eriginal]http://itswhatyoukeep.hubpages.com/hub/Geometric-vs-Arithmetic-Rate-of-…]
Nice link..however, i was referring to how pms make investment decisions. The way i see it, the first formula would be used to compare possible investments by setting a one year investment horizon. For example, investment a yields a certain return in 6 months, where as investment B yields another return in 18 months....using the first formula i would know which investment is better and be able to gauge it against say one-year t-bonds....The second formula however, gives me a the "actual" average annualized return on a particular investment.
To rephrase, why utilize the first formula in the first place, when you can use the second to essentially get the same information?
Inventore et quas rerum occaecati odit autem. Rerum consectetur atque harum mollitia quisquam deleniti. Explicabo vel dolorem sit et. Eius nostrum quia rerum. Non voluptas necessitatibus qui. Quas cumque iure soluta vitae. Porro amet dolores sit.
Voluptates nostrum nihil adipisci unde blanditiis culpa. Qui non ut accusamus. Quod aut dignissimos cum.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...