Trending Content - Investment Banking Forum
| +259 | Why UBS Is the Worst Place to Start Your IB Career | 40 | 1d |
| +216 | UBS 2nd Year Analyst Q&A (2026) | 41 | 5h |
| +94 | What's your craziest "hardo" story? | 16 | 14h |
| +62 | Indiana University Fraternity Pipelines | 36 | 2d |
| +52 | Rogo AI | 22 | 8h |
| +49 | Elite Boutique interview questions | 17 | 1d |
| +48 | Suspended for a Year | 19 | 3d |
| +47 | Wolf of Wall Street vs. Reality: Anyone else feel scammed by the movies? | 18 | 6h |
| +30 | Rate my non-target resume | 15 | 8h |
| +24 | RX Firm Lateral Advice | 15 | 12h |
Career Resources
In my experience, it's typically a variation of a DCF with a waterfall / recovery calculation built in. Can range in complexity depending on the company, but the only major differences between any non-RX model are the input assumptions. If you want to find those actual inputs and how they were derived, find a RX case that had a valuation fight and find the supporting pitchbooks filed / published by either PACER or a claims agent (e.g. Prime Clerk). Those pitchbooks will typically contain the WACC build out as well as the forecasting assumptions.
Cupiditate qui porro minus aut assumenda. Sunt quis et impedit. Repudiandae debitis est vitae quaerat. Et similique et inventore ducimus. Iste voluptas dolorem molestias.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...