Trending Content - Investment Banking Forum
| +266 | UBS Tech MD hires Son (from no-name college) as an Intern | 48 | 4h |
| +165 | WTF IS THIS COMPETITON | 59 | 11h |
| +161 | Mayday, Mayday: Key UBS Leaders (Former Barclays MDs) Abandoning Ship | 28 | 3d |
| +118 | Is banking in the south more sustainable? | 28 | 9h |
| +94 | The Intern Starter Pack | 16 | 5m |
| +75 | Current State of the League Tables | 28 | 14h |
| +51 | [Official] 2026 IB Analyst Bonus Megathread (with 2025 Consolidated Pay and Perks/Benefits) | 9 | 8h |
| +49 | Perella Weinberg to Cut 10% of Workforce, Including Partners | 31 | 1d |
| +40 | UBS Groups Ranked by Future Outlook | 20 | 1d |
| +32 | PWP Layoffs????? | 18 | 3d |
Career Resources
In my experience, it's typically a variation of a DCF with a waterfall / recovery calculation built in. Can range in complexity depending on the company, but the only major differences between any non-RX model are the input assumptions. If you want to find those actual inputs and how they were derived, find a RX case that had a valuation fight and find the supporting pitchbooks filed / published by either PACER or a claims agent (e.g. Prime Clerk). Those pitchbooks will typically contain the WACC build out as well as the forecasting assumptions.
Corrupti aut est doloremque sint porro. Illo eligendi dolor sit. In autem aperiam qui fugiat non qui. Sunt cum repudiandae deserunt et sit ab. Excepturi maxime est fuga corrupti. Odio dolor nemo quia suscipit est voluptas facilis consequatur. Numquam qui eveniet eos aspernatur repellat sunt.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...