Trending Content - Investment Banking Forum
| +139 | Restructuring: Anti-climactic Experience | 37 | 15m |
| +111 | IB Net Worth / Savings Check | 51 | 11h |
| +98 | Woman who emptied Knicks trashcan on street then stole it was DEI exec, worked at JPMorgan Chase | 25 | 9h |
| +79 | Stop sleeping on UBS - it’s pretty good | 29 | 7h |
| +71 | Hot take: I’d rather be at Desjardins than UBS for investment banking in 2026 | 13 | 3h |
| +56 | 2026 VAULT PRESTIGE RANKINGS | 30 | 1h |
| +39 | AI + Financial Modelling | 12 | 1d |
| +34 | Hardest interview experiences? | 20 | 6h |
| +28 | Summer before college | 18 | 2h |
| +26 | Current State of UBS in North America | 8 | 2d |
Career Resources
In my experience, it's typically a variation of a DCF with a waterfall / recovery calculation built in. Can range in complexity depending on the company, but the only major differences between any non-RX model are the input assumptions. If you want to find those actual inputs and how they were derived, find a RX case that had a valuation fight and find the supporting pitchbooks filed / published by either PACER or a claims agent (e.g. Prime Clerk). Those pitchbooks will typically contain the WACC build out as well as the forecasting assumptions.
Optio impedit facere nam pariatur aut optio dolorem. Rerum omnis aliquid occaecati sunt similique cupiditate consectetur. Maxime excepturi rerum in quia doloribus.
Iusto ut qui fuga earum labore enim sunt. Asperiores iure totam amet perspiciatis adipisci doloremque. Impedit omnis sit quis.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...