From my understanding of MMs, one major way they attract MDs from more reputable banks is to provide better economics to them in a deal. But I feel like MDs still make more at a BB even if the bank takes a bigger cut. I think it's understated how much a banks reputation has a factor in an MDs success and you can see this with the CS guys who moved over to MMs having a hard time pulling the same size and caliber of deals over which leads to less fee $ to go around. I feel the ones who can truly source deals without BB backing would join EBs/Boutiques. So do MDs at MMs with better economics really bring home more than their BB counterparts?
Trending Content - Investment Banking Forum
| +231 | Coverage Banking is Paradise | 29 | 6d |
| +164 | UBS preparing for a October Layoff Massacre | 127 | 2m |
| +121 | London Recruiting is Paradise | 47 | 3h |
| +77 | My Motivation Is At An All Time High | 13 | 4d |
| +56 | Work and Suicide | 24 | 3h |
| +49 | Is 7 years in banking enough to retire, or am I delusional? | 27 | 9h |
| +46 | Do actual investment bankers despise IB TikTokers as much as I think they do? | 28 | 6h |
| +34 | MM IB --> NYC IB? | 17 | 1d |
| +27 | Should I escape the matrix | 5 | 14h |
| +25 | Lawyer moving into Banking | 23 | 1h |
Career Resources
its not the rule that this is true but there are definetly circumstances where excatly what you said is true.
Qui delectus ullam nihil dolorem iure. Exercitationem voluptas odit aperiam voluptatum dolores beatae.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...