are target code names obvious to prospective buyers !!

Having read Rosenbaum as well as viewed various pitchbooks, I've observed that in the earlier stages of the deal process IBs will assign a code names to the client company and later to buyers as well. Since the world is small, I would think that both strategics and financial sponsors (PE) will have a pretty good idea of the space, vertical and industry they work in. If a bank presents their initial marketing material to prospective buyers, is it not obvious who the client company is given there are only limited companies with the financials/product offerings in the space? (e.g. there are idk only 20 construction material supply companys with 100m-200m revenue - maybe only applies to more larger firms and less in PE MM)

4 Comments
 

Fair question, the reality is that almost always the code name goes along with the name of the company. When you will receive the deck you will read something like "Project Venus" on the front page and in the first page you might read "Project Venus relates to the potential carve-out of the consulting division from Bain & Co...". Everyone working on the deal in IB, PE, PD usually knows about both the code name of the project and the name of the company/companies.

 

Not only does the code name usually correlate with the first letter of the name of the company (i.e. you might call an Amazon sale "Project Activate"), but even the teaser will also usually have identifying information (actual product names, detailed map). For the construction material supply example they'd probably include their leading product(s) and a description of it straight from the website. Extremely obvious.

 

The code names aren't there to keep the identity of the target (or acquiror) secret from people involved in the deal, even very early on. They're there as a simple and easy precaution against needless leaks by people talking / emailing about a deal in earshot or in view of people who have no legitimate need to know about it.

 

Sequi aliquid non occaecati et totam. Molestiae laudantium incidunt sint architecto saepe totam. Excepturi omnis eum dignissimos. Assumenda est laborum occaecati vel dolor nostrum numquam vel.

Et itaque deserunt incidunt autem eligendi officiis. Voluptatem occaecati assumenda commodi animi recusandae voluptas id.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.2%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.2%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (80) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”