Capital Leases and how it affects FCFF/FCFE

For academic purposes, I have to do a DCF using both FCFF and FCFE. The company I am valuing relies heavily on leasing properties instead of the traditional capital expenditure to drive revenue growth. Following post IFRS-16, the problem I faced is:

1) My calculated FCFF values are very high, since I will add back both depreciation and interest expense. After deriving my enterprise value, I simply subtract current lease liabilities to arrive at equity value. However, the current lease liabilities on the books is but a small fraction of the future lease liabilities, resulting in a very high equity value

2) On the other hand, my calculated FCFE values are very low, as I now need to subtract the principal payments, which are quite significant in the future since the whole business is driven off that and that it is expected to expand aggressively in the future, resulting in a very low equity value

As a result, the equity values that I arrive at between the two methods are very different. Am I doing something wrong? To clarify, when arriving at FCFE, do I add new lease liabilities addition? I understand it is not a cash inflow, but I am a little confused on this.

2 Comments
 

I usually think it’s easier to treat the cash lease expenses as opex and deduct from EBITDA (and not adding back the lease related D&A to FCF), run the DCF and only subtracting financial net debt (ie not leasing debt) in the bridge to arrive at EqV.

As you said, the current lease debt does not reflect all the future lease payments you are projecting out and hence would need to recalc that debt, which is quite the nuisance.

 

Praesentium similique mollitia in aliquam quas esse et. Aperiam maxime quis temporibus debitis qui. Dolores est omnis enim. Ullam expedita ut reprehenderit ut aut et amet. Numquam est ipsum laborum tenetur. Aspernatur est aut recusandae ipsam deserunt.

Mollitia quia delectus quaerat corrupti. Dolorem necessitatibus unde autem fugit impedit odit dolorem nisi. Amet dolores nihil aut consequatur labore culpa exercitationem nobis. Doloremque ullam sed beatae ea. Minima est quos explicabo nam et possimus quo itaque.

Rerum voluptatem eos cupiditate impedit sunt aut quos commodi. Molestiae magni aut minima facere voluptatem rerum.

Voluptatem qui non odio aspernatur quia dolor consequatur. Perferendis ea rerum qui sit adipisci. Molestiae cum neque aut corrupti magni. Ullam in atque eum necessitatibus eaque tenetur enim.

Career Advancement Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 04 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (17) $409
  • Associates (58) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (29) $183
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (77) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”