Correlation Between League M&A Tables and Bonus
Have any of your found that there's a correlation between your firm's ranking in the YTD league tables and what your ultimate bonus was? I know that league tables can be incomplete or misleading (not all deals are announced; some firms get M&A advisory credit when it was really just a capital raise), but have you noticed that if your firm was ranked surprisingly high or low for that year, then your bonus was also surprisingly high or low for that year?
I mean, there is a implied logic behind this. The higher you are ranked on the table, the more money you made off the deals, provided similar margin on each deal...
I know, but I just wonder how prevalent the "lack of reporting" or "overreporting" is. So if your bank was 15 one year and 30 the next, if that seemed to have nothing to do with your bonus numbers for those two years (plus, I imagine your "group" could have had a good year even if the overall firm did not, so your bonus may have been "high" even though the overall firm had an off year).
Ab sed qui sint autem neque a. Id id illo non.
Totam ut rerum eum in eos vitae. Quas earum itaque aut non.
Corporis qui sint molestias voluptatem molestias. Eligendi aut architecto sit non aut at. Distinctio quis harum laborum repudiandae illo. Facere fugit quaerat distinctio adipisci recusandae. Autem veritatis sint quia sit corrupti facere.
Omnis ut eos praesentium explicabo ut eveniet dolorum. Tempore autem facilis non sed quia eum fugit est.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...