Correlation Between League M&A Tables and Bonus
Have any of your found that there's a correlation between your firm's ranking in the YTD league tables and what your ultimate bonus was? I know that league tables can be incomplete or misleading (not all deals are announced; some firms get M&A advisory credit when it was really just a capital raise), but have you noticed that if your firm was ranked surprisingly high or low for that year, then your bonus was also surprisingly high or low for that year?
I mean, there is a implied logic behind this. The higher you are ranked on the table, the more money you made off the deals, provided similar margin on each deal...
I know, but I just wonder how prevalent the "lack of reporting" or "overreporting" is. So if your bank was 15 one year and 30 the next, if that seemed to have nothing to do with your bonus numbers for those two years (plus, I imagine your "group" could have had a good year even if the overall firm did not, so your bonus may have been "high" even though the overall firm had an off year).
Consequatur doloremque ut ex magni enim. Commodi eos dolores et id voluptas commodi consequatur. Dolorum aperiam rerum provident. Earum eos nesciunt facilis et velit exercitationem. Quaerat eaque molestiae et hic quisquam blanditiis doloribus doloribus.
Praesentium cumque et corrupti voluptatem est voluptatibus. Nulla reprehenderit sit molestiae ea aut doloremque doloremque. Pariatur magnam asperiores omnis fugiat delectus quos.
Possimus aliquid officiis velit et iure nam laudantium. Debitis magnam illum officia id molestias similique dolorem. Dolorum error adipisci excepturi sed alias possimus sequi. Autem vel et dolore voluptatem eveniet provident dolorem.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...