Del

………………………….. ………………………….. ………………………….. ………………………….. ………………………….. ………………………….. ………………………….. …………………………..

58 Comments
 

The municipal investment banking (Public Finance) space has its own dynamics and can vary depending on the economic environment and government funding needs. Based on the most helpful WSO content:

  1. State of the Muni Business: Public Finance can be a stable area, especially during times of economic uncertainty, as governments often need to raise funds for infrastructure and public projects. However, it can also be cyclical, with activity influenced by interest rates, government budgets, and policy changes. For example, municipal debt often requires more quantitative structuring compared to corporate debt, as it needs to align with revenue constraints and issuer goals.

  2. Firms to Consider:

    • Bulge Brackets with a Public Finance presence (e.g., JPMorgan, Citi, BofA) are strong players.
    • Regional firms and boutiques with a focus on Public Finance, such as Siebert and Loop, are also worth exploring.
    • UBS exited the Public Finance business, so it’s no longer an option in this space.
  3. Lifestyle and Skills: Public Finance offers a balance of decent work hours (around 60-70 hours per week on average) and a good living. It also requires strong quantitative skills and an interest in public policy, as you’ll work closely with government entities and advisors.

For more detailed insights, you can explore this WSO thread: https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/investment-banking/public-finance…</a">Public Finance Q&A.

Sources: Public Finance Investment Banking Information, J.P. Morgan and now UBS? What exactly is the state of investment banking..., Public Finance Q&A, Q&A: Public Finance Recruiting and Interviewing, https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/investment-banking/public-finance-qa?customgpt=1

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 
Most Helpful

Given the new administration coming in, most speculate that this will be a record year for issuance so should see a lot of volume. That said, some are also speculating that the new admin will remove buckets of qualified uses (mostly in private activity bonds) which will limit future volume on a go forward basis.

Bigger issue is fee compression that has been prevalent for decades as this point. Too many older bankers have already made their big money in the past when fees were higher/have too much of a soft spot thinking they’re doing “public good”/have no fee discipline and are willing to make juniors do all this white glove service for no money.

You have to do 5x the work of a LevFin or DCM issuance (for things like tax law compliance and structuring to remain within tax law) for 1/4 of the fees (munis aren’t breaking half a point on takedowns unless it’s certain types of PABS, but that product will be in focus of getting limited/reduced by the new admin). You’re looking at upwards of 2 points in takedowns in LevFin/DCM.

All that said, revenues aren’t supporting the headcount required to do the job so PubFin bankers are getting stretched to do more for worse pay than corporates. I see assocs in my group doing analyst work frequently and/or not having analyst support on their deals. VPs constantly having to take the assoc role. No one coming out of college should be building a career in munis at this point. Go corporate and don’t look back. If you’re in munis, try to lateral ASAP.

 

Agree with everything you've stated. The big powerhouses in munis have undercut negotiated takedowns so low (I've seen as low as $1 for a GO but I think $3-$5 is more common) that it is hard to justify a career in this space even if you like it. 80%-90% of DCM hours with probably a 50% haircut in comp over time does not sit well... However, I have seen some interesting things in the healthcare / P3 / transportation / sports segments that are closer to corporate transactions and most likely the better paid of the pubfin groups and provide more exits/lateral possibilities if that's your end goal. Personally find the education (K-12 and university) segment interesting but certainly not for everyone!

 

Top shop vp's will clear around 400, mm shops around 275-300. MD's are making between 500k-1.2mm but often seem to do more work than you'd think given how lean they have to run due to fee compression. Lot more deals need to be done or more high yield to make that 7 figure mark.

 

What are common exits? DCM and Levfin I assume are easier than others but what about private credit and stuff

 

I'm late to this, but I've been in the space at a BB for a few years now (specifically P3/Project Finance) and have a good grasp on the industry. 

I wrote a thread on teams across the street (see link below), but high-level I'd classify the banks in the following tiers, based on a combination of deal size and complexity of transactions:

  • Tier 1: BofA, Barclays, Goldman, Jefferies, JPM, MS, and RBC (Citi left the business last year, but they would be in this category) 
  • Tier 2: Wells Fargo, top MWBEs (Ramirez, Siebert, and Loop), some MMs (Raymond James, Stifel, Piper Sandler, etc.)
  • Tier 3: Hilltop, some MMs (KeyBanc, Oppenheimer, Truist, etc.), other MWBEs (Academy, Cabrera, etc.) (UBS left the business last year, but they would be in this category)

https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/investment-banking/public-finance-municipal-groups

In general, the P3/Project Finance and Not-For-Profit Healthcare teams within PubFin develop the most "corporate" like skillset and tend to work on complex deals. Unlike other areas of PubFin, these teams tend to do a mix of debt financing work and M&A work. These bankers charge higher fees on transactions and likewise tend to be compensated greater than their other PubFin peers. Complex work and higher fees do come at the expense of WLB as these teams operate closer to traditional IB hours. 

Conversely, the "traditional" business (regional coverage, public power, higher education, etc.) tend to develop more niche skillsets and mostly focus on debt financings for highly rated entities. This is not to say the job is easy (debt structuring/restructuring can quickly become very complex), but a lot of the job is spent on RFPs and pitching with client relationships often being rather political given the nature of the business. Fees are often low ($2 - $5/bond) and banks often win mandates by either 1) bidding the lowest fee or 2) being next-up in the "pool". On a positive note, these roles can be quite interesting if you have an interest in public policy and WLB tends to be good (~60 hours a week).

Due to the lower average fee pool, staffing in PubFin tends to run quite lean to keep expenses down. Senior bankers tend to be more in the weeds of deals and junior bankers typically are staffed as the lone junior or are expected to work on a multiple live transactions and pitches at the same time. This leads to there being very little downtime in the workday unlike traditional IB. As an extreme example, my team just completed a high yield project finance transaction with only two team members staffed on it (MD and Analyst). This dynamic can be seen as a pro or a con, but it is worth noting. 

 

Sint fugit ratione voluptatem. Dolor cumque commodi aperiam a. Sed sunt totam quibusdam repellat repudiandae culpa ut. Minima est magnam ut est. Consequatur iure est vel est nihil quia. Ducimus ut quisquam fugiat officiis vel.

Voluptatem tempora consequatur eius qui praesentium. Provident cum dignissimos nihil possimus. Corporis ut voluptatum molestiae ipsum non. Sunt deserunt aut consequatur voluptas similique aliquam. Magnam enim explicabo perferendis voluptas eos. Excepturi iusto consequatur voluptas deleniti sit omnis.

Ut est dicta saepe aut. Nulla aut molestiae voluptatem incidunt minima consectetur quasi. Debitis qui voluptatem recusandae a maiores voluptatem ad vel. Tempore pariatur corrupti perspiciatis corrupti est maxime omnis. Qui deserunt labore ut hic labore. Doloremque qui reiciendis quasi qui quibusdam.

Et facere quam ut dolore aliquid enim. Quis magni minus deleniti molestiae ipsum ut qui. Quae doloremque laudantium qui rerum nisi sunt illum. Nihil modi illum pariatur est.

 

Voluptatem ut quos qui. Ullam qui error odit. Ipsa aliquid consequatur voluptatem doloribus praesentium voluptas fugiat odio. Enim aut est omnis omnis rerum. Consequuntur nobis quo recusandae laborum ut consectetur a. Vel ab totam ut debitis. Omnis incidunt in suscipit neque pariatur.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (77) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (71) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”