18 Comments
 

someone feel free to correct me if I'm wrong - but I've spent a bit of time in the activism defence space when I was recruiting (I talked to a few juniors in the space and an activist as well). From my understanding, it's very hard to rank the teams with the public information that is available to you. There is a Bloomberg league table specifically for the activism vertical which ranks teams by # of mandates/most influential mandates.

A lot of companies that keep an activism defense team on retainer tend not to publicly disclose it so you don't really know which teams work with which companies and ultimately how they stack up against the other. 

 
Most Helpful

Worth noting that a lot of activism defence goes unpaid and often tied into broader defence mandates. There's potential to get paid an ongoing activism fee once a situation goes live (e.g., an activist campaign goes public, a general meeting is requisitioned, etc.). However, the usual focus is on locking up any resulting M&A, such as a corporate sale, break-up, among others. I find most of this work is handled by the coverage / industry teams, and the actual activism team ends up being rather small. These are my observations, so I'm equally curious to hear others' perspectives to see if they are consistent. 

 

this is super helpful thanks. Sry if this is a a stupid question but what's the incentive then for activist teams to do so much work on anticipating an preventing campaigns? Wouldn't they want more proxy wars to generate more fees? 

 

plzgivemeajob

this is super helpful thanks. Sry if this is a a stupid question but what's the incentive then for activist teams to do so much work on anticipating an preventing campaigns? Wouldn't they want more proxy wars to generate more fees? 

Same logic as restructuring teams, i.e., wouldn't it be better if companies didn't find themselves insolvent or in that mess? Management / Boards have a tendency to find them in theseselves situations without having their own advisers trying to underhanded them. 

To address your question, I would say (i) defence advisers are generally engaged by the Chair / CEO (usually with support from the Board / CFO) and they wouldn't choose an adviser who wasn't providing good advice on activism, (ii) activism fees pale in comparison to M&A fees and so the priority is the latter, and (iii) if your client loses the activism battle, chances are that you're fired as the adviser when the new management / Board comes in (no bueno for you the banker).

 

Activism SUCKS and is the single worst black hole you could be in as a "banker", actually worse than being an ECM slide monkey because they aren't in pressure cooker situations with Trian trying to (justifiably) fire an incompetent management team you are trying to kick save. Sounds cool, isn't. 

Source: Worked at a generalist EB that did these mandates too and it was the worst possible staffing bar none.

---
Keep throwing your MS activism nerds, hopefully Trian drops a letter to your client with negative 5 year TSR this weekend 

 

Et quis sapiente et iste sed dolorum quia. Porro quasi et nihil deleniti soluta quisquam. Molestias est aspernatur ratione atque tempore explicabo. Delectus temporibus molestias iure autem eligendi assumenda. Excepturi beatae nobis excepturi nisi et.

Magnam modi dolorem soluta eveniet et dolor. Eum autem ut et. Aut quae quo ratione qui.

Architecto et voluptatem rem consequatur quod qui repudiandae aperiam. Nisi necessitatibus nam unde praesentium soluta voluptatum qui. Rerum delectus quos dolor ut ratione.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”