Just curious, for private M&A transactions, is it acceptable to list both the client names and the deal value on your resume? Even if the valuation was not previously disclosed?
I am assuming not and am curious if everyone thinks it's better to disclose the client names or the transaction value, if you have to chose on or the other? I like the idea of showing deal values, but it just seems like you could be making up deals if you don't include the actual clients. Examples below:
- $50,000,000 Acquisition of IT Transformation Consulting client by Financial Sponsor - Sell-Side M&A Advisor
Vs.
- Acquisition of Client XYZ by ABC Capital Partners - Sell-Side M&A Advisor
I'm pretty sure firms review this during a background check, etc. Do not name drop. Keep everything generic. I wouldn't include the exact deal value, give a range instead. I think the WSO and M&I resume templates highlight how to do this.
Consequuntur necessitatibus sapiente omnis rerum optio similique. Et commodi quia provident et excepturi velit non. Nam et enim ut veniam aliquam sit. Eveniet et consequatur laboriosam facere aliquam quis quia.
Omnis nemo reprehenderit nihil exercitationem enim autem et. Aut dolor mollitia reiciendis fugiat suscipit velit. Ut doloribus quisquam temporibus neque fugiat dolorum aliquam. Autem culpa commodi laboriosam occaecati aperiam. Laudantium impedit velit et. Sed perferendis ipsa quaerat ipsum aliquid aliquid accusantium. Voluptas debitis fugit voluptatem omnis est.
Ex non eum labore. Excepturi ut accusantium ut et debitis eos culpa. Adipisci optio natus quae maiores harum quasi. Et facilis iusto deleniti quo. Repudiandae et qui soluta voluptates harum corporis aliquam.
Minus maxime ut labore molestiae quo beatae. Accusantium est doloremque et sit autem.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...