Hello everyone,
I understand that asset-heavy companies are typically valued using an EBIT multiple. However, I've noticed many publicly traded companies announce their acquisitions as a multiple of EBITDA.
When I divide the Enterprise Value by EBIT for these acquisitions, the resulting EBIT multiple seems quite high (over 30x).
Am I wrong in thinking that EBIT multiples are more appropriate for asset-heavy industries?
Thanks in advance for your thoughts.
| +270 | Earliest you can get fired | 58 | 15h |
| +251 | UBS’s M&A BANKERS ARE DOING TERRIBLY. $200M EXTRA IS BEING CUT | 47 | 19h |
| +238 | Investment Banking is Divine | 40 | 11h |
| +223 | Career Crossroads | 31 | 1d |
| +213 | US 2027 SA IB worried about background check | 53 | 8h |
| +207 | Another $115bn Mega deal for these banks. Congrats! | 45 | 12h |
| +206 | Analyst: Why is UBS IB doing worse than peers?, UBS CFO: No Comment | 41 | 1d |
| +122 | Is UBS really that bad? | 38 | 10h |
| +39 | Is Houston SA 28 recruiting already over? | 33 | 13h |
| +26 | 2026-27 IB Energy Top Banks | 8 | 14h |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Ut ad voluptatem impedit dolores in. Sed et a est excepturi dolorem. Tempore qui aspernatur doloribus deleniti. In illum excepturi maiores illo aspernatur molestiae.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...