Enterprise Value - Why do you subtract cash?

I was reading Moyer's and the explanation goes as follows:

The rationale for this is that the decision by the firm to hold cash rather than pay down debt is a strategic financial decision. For example, consider two firms that, for hypothetical purposes, have exactly the same intrinsic EV. The management of Firm X wants to appear to have strong liquidity and thus holds a large cash balance over the quarter-end reporting date. The management of Firm Y wants to show that it has relatively less leverage and thus uses all available cash to pay down a working capital line on the last day of the quarter. If no adjustment for cash is made, Firm Y would appear to have a higher EV even though, per our assumption, they are equal.

Why would Firm Y have a higher EV if cash is not subtracted?

14 Comments
 

I’m sure someone will disagree with me here but in general the main purpose of EV is to make an adjustment to market cap for the purposes of M&A. This is also why you add in debt, as market cap alone doesn’t capture the true value that an acquirer would pay for. The cash would not be included in a sale, debt would, so you add the debt and subtract the cash and that gives you a very rough estimate of the value of the firm in terms of M&A.

 
Most Helpful

The value of a house you buy is $1,000 but inside the house there's a hundred dollar bill just sitting there. You gain $100 after your purchase, so before your purchase you can think of the value of the house as $900.

 

Laboriosam eum consequatur corporis mollitia minima rerum non. Tempore aperiam natus aut saepe beatae modi deserunt. Optio quos molestiae accusamus totam sequi rerum modi quam. Aliquid reprehenderit sit explicabo quis magni dolorem illum beatae.

Sed dolorum ratione voluptatibus quod. Veniam veritatis odio dolorem voluptas occaecati sit recusandae. Sapiente voluptates explicabo eaque cum.

Laudantium voluptatem et itaque minus ut nisi nulla ut. Culpa mollitia quo amet hic et inventore.

Career Advancement Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 04 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (17) $409
  • Associates (58) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (29) $183
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (77) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”