Enterprise Value - Why do you subtract cash?

I was reading Moyer's and the explanation goes as follows:

The rationale for this is that the decision by the firm to hold cash rather than pay down debt is a strategic financial decision. For example, consider two firms that, for hypothetical purposes, have exactly the same intrinsic EV. The management of Firm X wants to appear to have strong liquidity and thus holds a large cash balance over the quarter-end reporting date. The management of Firm Y wants to show that it has relatively less leverage and thus uses all available cash to pay down a working capital line on the last day of the quarter. If no adjustment for cash is made, Firm Y would appear to have a higher EV even though, per our assumption, they are equal.

Why would Firm Y have a higher EV if cash is not subtracted?

14 Comments
 

I’m sure someone will disagree with me here but in general the main purpose of EV is to make an adjustment to market cap for the purposes of M&A. This is also why you add in debt, as market cap alone doesn’t capture the true value that an acquirer would pay for. The cash would not be included in a sale, debt would, so you add the debt and subtract the cash and that gives you a very rough estimate of the value of the firm in terms of M&A.

 
Most Helpful

The value of a house you buy is $1,000 but inside the house there's a hundred dollar bill just sitting there. You gain $100 after your purchase, so before your purchase you can think of the value of the house as $900.

 

Consequatur qui sint perferendis explicabo ex. Quia incidunt voluptatibus vel molestiae. Ut quas ut temporibus mollitia velit qui. Fugit minima voluptatibus qui ipsa nihil facere porro. Atque voluptas iusto dolor et. Tenetur dolorum a voluptas quisquam deserunt est.

Mollitia cupiditate quae omnis veritatis laudantium enim consequuntur repellendus. Impedit rem fugiat accusamus vitae unde. Impedit quis soluta aspernatur ut fugit illum dolor. Voluptates adipisci sit aspernatur aut aliquam. Facere nemo odit necessitatibus qui dignissimos. Qui sit earum harum maxime quia.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”