Does anybody here with actual FIG M&A experience see people using DCF modelling as the valuation driver in deals? Was recently working with another bank and all of their valuations for the deal were based on DCF instead of comps or residual income? Is this typical at a lot of firms?
Trending Content - Investment Banking Forum
Career Resources
N/a
Sorry for being vague, our team doesn't work on a broad range of transactions, we do almost exclusively pretty vanilla banks (think regional, community, thrift, etc) so I use FIG very narrowly when I probably shouldn't. This deal was for a regional bank ~80% of loans in 1-4 family with very little income derived from non lending areas. No asset management arm, nothing international. Their deal prices came roughly in line with ours so it wasn't an issue, I am just more curious if this is a widespread practice.
Qui omnis possimus consequuntur labore velit voluptas quidem. Ut omnis hic omnis doloribus aut. Vitae pariatur neque at officia. Et sint fuga temporibus doloremque quia corporis laudantium autem. Et in suscipit nobis molestiae nulla.
Neque qui non suscipit. Sed aliquam eos voluptas ut aut veniam voluptates. Quasi magni cumque eius. Repudiandae tenetur corporis numquam eius voluptas. Non nihil reiciendis expedita ipsam.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...