Front office/Middle office/Back office

Hey guys,

So we all know about the front office and what roles are typically contained there, however can any one give me a list of roles split up by middle office and back office (it doesn't matter if the role is split between offices).

Thanks in advance for any good responses!!

53 Comments
 

I'm not sure why this got MS'd. If someone has a different perspective of be happy to hear it.

By 'product' I mean the physical good or service that is sold to a customer to generate income. Without the front office, the product doesn't get sold to the customer. In some businesses, the middle office is important in ensuring the correctness and sometimes the legality of the product/sale, especially in places like banks where the sale is, at often times, complex, involving many hoops from regulators, or special needs for individual clients. And the back office contributes by ensuring that resources are properly maintained or allocated to ensure smooth continuity.

 

From what you said, you're implying that corporate development and strategy are revenue generating businesses. That is not true at all. You try to make money on that stuff without salesmanship and see where it gets you. Those two are nothing until it gets implemented in the front office where the folks capture the value add. Strategy is the base cost; salesmanship is always the value, whether it's a bank negotiated deal or an Armani branded suit.

 
"iBankedUp"

From what you said, you're implying that corporate development and strategy are revenue generating businesses. That is not true at all. You try to make money on that stuff without salesmanship and see where it gets you. Those two are nothing until it gets implemented in the front office where the folks capture the value add. Strategy is the base cost; salesmanship is always the value, whether it's a bank negotiated deal or an Armani branded suit.

Lol

 

I definitely feel like OP had a legitimate (if very 'big') question basically about the internal organization of an investment bank.

I've seen a lot of org charts and I would say they tend to be helpful in understanding it to first order - I would google "investment bank structure/map" or similar and look at a few of them.

But on on a higher level, I'm sure someone has written up a detailed breakdown of the corporate structure of an investment bank, and perhaps details the individual roles and experiences that go into each. If not perhaps it would be a great idea for this forum to have a sheet of all the different major roles, descriptions of each, and where each fit into the bank.

It seems like something the site would have done long ago, especially because these terms are used so heavily on here and it's not always clear if people are referring to the same things or not.

 

Yes, I was trying to find out about the general organization of banking roles and departments. And thanks for the advice. I've looked up some previous org charts but it never specifies what the actual difference between FO and MO is. The difference b/w FO and BO is more obvious. It seems to me that any directly supporting role to FO such as risk managment would be considered "MO".

 

FO - revenue generating MO - risk, treasury, depending who you talk to can be other support roles BO - IT depending on the firm and team, some MO roles have more respect than others. many pple work in MO who are more than capable of working FO but choose to for the fewer hrs/less stress etc. I say this as someone who has worked in both FO and MO.

 

From the job description does the work you will be doing sound like it will be for clients to see, or will it be for employees to see. That should be a pretty good indication.

make it hard to spot the general by working like a soldier
 

The only front office jobs are, simply put, revenue generating positions where you have access to clients and/or money. Any positions used to support traders, investment advisors/analysts, or bankers, is considered middle to back-office. And there's almost no distinction between middle to back office, except for on paper, and probably only if you're the guy trying to sell someone the idea that you're in middle office so you're almost at the front.

 

I am a noob! I apologize Mr. SMARTEST person on earth who has never asked a dumb question. I should take advices from you and learn how to be a dick.

 

I work in research, and I highly doubt it would be considered anything other than FO, back then and now.

Talk to people who have been in the business for over 25+ years and ask them what they think...

Pretty sure S&T would have a tough time getting paid w/o research and vice versa...IB could equally have a hard time as well, arguably, since alot of times the decision to add a bank to a deal (unless you're a lead) is for access to their research (ie, becoming a company covered and increasing access to potential institutional clients).

Just my 2cents

 

The bigger the shop, the more this is true. Most smaller companies have a greater percentage of employees who work front office versus middle/back because they use many more vendors unlike the larger companies who have the resources to build in house systems.

Frank Sinatra - "Alcohol may be man's worst enemy, but the bible says love your enemy."
 

2% is a bullshit number, I don't know where you got that.

<p> Think of a place like <abbr title="JP Morgan">JP</abbr> Morgan. It has something like 150,000 employees. There is a zero percent chance that only 3,000 are 'front office'. Keep in mind that this is a commercial bank and most of the employees are tellers or other low-level employees. 2% is still not true there. I don't even know if you would consider a teller a front office position....they deal with clients, but get paid somewhere near minimum wage. It certainly wouldn't be a sought after position whether you call it front office or back office. Even with all of that, I guarantee you they have more bankers, traders, and sales people in highly sought after positions (traditionally referred to as front office) than 3,000.</p> <p> A true investment bank would have a much higher proportion of the 'good' positions compared to a commercial bank. So, the questions are: who gave you this bogus figure and what made you believe them?</p>
 

For the sake of this thread, let's keep it focused on investment banks. I doubt a single person on this forum is here to join a retail bank, whether it's to be a teller or not.

To answer your question, the guy giving me this statistic is an associate at JP Morgan that I went to school with. He has a middle office job, but yeah 2% sounded low.

______ Corporate financial/business analyst looking for career/MBA/CFA advice.
 

@fcv200v

You aren't very good with numbers, I take it?

The point was, even at a place like JP Morgan, where tellers and what not are the majority of employees, you still will end up with greater than 2% of employees that people here would consider front office positions. It's a stupid number and you need to discard it from your brain.

 

Front Office = your team is client facing and the work you do can/will be seen by clients, ie business comes through you "Middle Office" (if there is such a thing) = support to direct support of the front office Back Office = nothing to do with the clients, data entry, and "clean up" back end type work (aka filing)

OR

FO -> Starters/rotational guys/mission critical backups/Coaches MO -> Bench warmers/athletic trainers/equipment managers BO -> Towel boy

Ace all your PE interview questions with the WSO Private Equity Prep Pack: http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/guide/private-equity-interview-prep-questions
 

MO, though not a bad role as the skills used to develop internal valuation models are pretty transferable to FO positions. Wouldn't be my first choice if I had other options though.

“I'm tired of this back-slapping "Isn't humanity neat?" bullshit. We're a virus with shoes, okay? That's all we are.” - Hicks
 

If you have to ask...

Wall Street leaders now understand that they made a mistake, one born of their innocent and trusting nature. They trusted ordinary Americans to behave more responsibly than they themselves ever would, and these ordinary Americans betrayed their trust.
 

The definitions for FO/MO/BO aren't consistent.

Research isn't revenue generating, but it's an important role clients want filled by top notch people so it gets called FO (even though tellers who are also "client facing" aren't FO, though the sales people in the branch are).

Traders on CVA desks aren't client facing, nor are they (typically) revenue generating, but they have to maintain complex positions and get paid well as a result. I don't think they care what office people say they work in.

Internal treasury desks are often referred to on this board as MO, even though many banks have traders working in these divisions who are comped based on revenue.

IT is also BO, unless IT is incredibly good in which case it becomes FO.

 

Read the new Leveraged Sell-out book, it has a hilarious section on this. Awesome book in general, I bought it yesterday and read it in a couple hours, one of the best books I've read in a while.

 

Repellendus quidem vitae pariatur ducimus itaque non non. Explicabo quaerat quia quos omnis saepe ratione ab. Et repellendus quia earum laboriosam sit consequuntur ad.

Quos libero exercitationem provident tempore enim in enim cumque. Aut pariatur aspernatur ea quas dolorum. Dolor aut et nobis optio aut est. Necessitatibus eaque fuga totam corporis quis delectus cum.

Error expedita quisquam quia amet. Beatae enim fuga non sit sed ea. Excepturi modi omnis enim blanditiis est. Ullam non qui aliquid qui et quae eaque. Est sed dolorem sint consectetur. Ipsam harum assumenda aliquid quos.

Et quia quo aut. Tenetur ad qui perferendis voluptatibus sunt. Nemo non doloremque sint tempora natus laborum.

 

A quasi quis ullam qui. Exercitationem debitis est eos deleniti illo est aspernatur. Voluptas velit aliquam aut est debitis unde magnam.

Quisquam corrupti optio quasi quia neque aut. Doloremque rerum soluta quia. Et libero corporis rerum ex ipsam est est. Et quisquam eveniet quam ea amet maxime rerum. Aperiam voluptas aliquam minus temporibus dolorum natus alias. Voluptas facilis in occaecati quo aliquid.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (67) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”