Getting a BB job just for brand name?
I'm an incoming analyst at a MM. Been in NYC for a year prior, and plan to stay in the NYC area for 3-4ish years before calling it quits on the city. Theres a few things I noticed, that at my previous role (NYC-based) I was getting more hits for interviews and HH inbounds than my colleagues an hour away in the exact same role and felt much more negotiating power/desirability when looking in different cities. Now I upgraded my title and expect a meaningful bump in that same status. Provided everything seems fine and theres no red flags I plan on staying at my current firm and even transferring to a regional office in my hometown when I decide to move. But the thought crossed my mind, since career progression is a game of increasing closing doors, that would it be worth my time to get one last hoorah at a BB for like a 1 year stint as an 1st or 2nd year associate solely for the branding? Another idea was seeing if I could join a GS/MS/JPM (not EB), in an adjacent role (AM, IR, Strategy, CorpDev) to then introduce myself as a ex-GS professional. Note, my (hopefully) next steps would be 1. LMM PE/GE, 2. Venture (Corporate or Independent Fund), 3. Chill Corporate Dev/Strat + founder combo, all at a T2/T3 city. One big data point I have to back the brand-name thought is my old bosses were both MF/BB directors in non-FO seats before pivoting out to entepreneurship and no one questions their abilities or credentials. I plan to continue updating my title, but my question is, is it worth it to go to a shop like that solely for brand name/credentials/network?
Jumping to a BB for the brand name can be a strategic move, but it depends on your long-term goals and the trade-offs you're willing to make. Based on the most helpful WSO content, here are some key considerations:
1. Brand Name Value
2. Trade-offs
3. Adjacent Roles at BBs
4. Long-Term Goals
5. Timing and Execution
Conclusion
A BB stint for branding can be worth it if it aligns with your long-term goals and you’re prepared for the trade-offs. However, it’s not the only way to achieve your objectives. If you’re thriving at your MM firm and have a clear path to your next steps, staying put and focusing on skill-building and networking might be just as effective.
Sources: Q&A: Non-Target --> BB BO --> BB ECM, Advice for New Analysts Seeking PE Exits, Do "no-name" boutiques really open doors to MMs and BBs?, https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/investment-banking/why-go-from-elite-boutique-to-bulge-bracket?customgpt=1, Top BB vs. Top EB - 2019 Future Prospects, Exit Opps, Branding, Etc.
Bump - anyone?
Granted I’m in consulting so not positive about the finance world, but afaik, non-IB/quant roles at banks don’t carry nearly as much cachet. I think strategy/bizdev etc. look a lot better at big companies than at banks
Tough to give advice when you haven’t shared your long term goals. What do you want to do in 3-4 years? Do you like what you do now / your current team?
If you like the team now and like the job I would not move just for the brand name. The ability to either transfer offices at your firm or get better hits outside NYC when you plan to move anyway is great. No reason to risk a poor outcome at a new firm.
Aut dolor rem voluptas deserunt maxime. Quia velit laboriosam similique tenetur. Vel velit error nostrum occaecati cupiditate voluptatem.
Et sed aut ratione cum veniam expedita. Omnis dolores odio vitae. Quia eum quo omnis rem quod fugit at.
Voluptas facilis voluptas ea consequatur vel quisquam labore. Natus itaque commodi facilis dolorem distinctio esse maiores. Id magni reprehenderit non non est facere sunt.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...