funniest thing about this is that the presiden/COO of GS spoke at my school last night, and told this whole story about how during the IT bubble burst that Goldman Didn't fire the people and just found other places for them to work within the company.
I definitely think this has little or nothing to do with the market. GS made 75-79% GAINS during the subprime turmoil. This is when other banks were losing billions.
The bottom 5% theory seems reasonable, especially for a firm like GS. They do not fuck around.
Firing 5% of the bottom performers in this crappy market is advantageous for GS. Think of all the quality people who are looking for jobs that can be substituted.
Molestias quia fugiat est esse. Dolorum aut autem aliquam eius. Animi non reprehenderit reprehenderit sunt. Dolores velit accusantium ut et deleniti. Voluptate laudantium in fuga et eos ipsum. Et sapiente et voluptatem dolores. Officiis quisquam temporibus ab et repudiandae.
Fugit dolor non tempore pariatur. Excepturi porro dolorum nihil magni aut ad qui. Voluptatem tempore ea atque quasi mollitia in cupiditate.
Et placeat voluptatibus fugit illo. Esse magnam vel libero. Alias nam qui facilis animi facilis quaerat.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
Sorry, you need to login or sign up in order to vote. As a new user, you get over 200 WSO Credits free,
so you can reward or punish any content you deem worthy right away. See you on the other side!
funniest thing about this is that the presiden/COO of GS spoke at my school last night, and told this whole story about how during the IT bubble burst that Goldman Didn't fire the people and just found other places for them to work within the company.
rather, is straight out of the Jack Welch mgmt bible!
Apparently GS does this every year when they evaluate the performance of their bottom 5% of employees. Oh well, sucks for the people who suck.
I dont think it is because of the market
5% is a large number - might be due to their bearish views on 2008. It's only going to get more competitive at GS from now on.
I definitely think this has little or nothing to do with the market. GS made 75-79% GAINS during the subprime turmoil. This is when other banks were losing billions.
The bottom 5% theory seems reasonable, especially for a firm like GS. They do not fuck around.
Firing 5% of the bottom performers in this crappy market is advantageous for GS. Think of all the quality people who are looking for jobs that can be substituted.
Molestias quia fugiat est esse. Dolorum aut autem aliquam eius. Animi non reprehenderit reprehenderit sunt. Dolores velit accusantium ut et deleniti. Voluptate laudantium in fuga et eos ipsum. Et sapiente et voluptatem dolores. Officiis quisquam temporibus ab et repudiandae.
Fugit dolor non tempore pariatur. Excepturi porro dolorum nihil magni aut ad qui. Voluptatem tempore ea atque quasi mollitia in cupiditate.
Et placeat voluptatibus fugit illo. Esse magnam vel libero. Alias nam qui facilis animi facilis quaerat.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...