Has anyone been staffed on a deal they had moral objections to?
Curious how people handled being staffed on a project with companies they didn’t morally agree with. For example, a gaming/lodging merger for those that disapprove of gambling.
Did you request to move off the project? Stay on and ignore your morals?
No judgment here, just interested in learning how people handle these situations.
Damn dude...the guy brought up a valid point that a moral and good human being should strive to have and you just outed yourself as a pos lmao
least out-of-touch with humanity WSO user
I work in a fairly niche sub-vertical that occasionally requires me to work directly with law enforcement facing/cop loving companies. A lot of ex police presence at some of these firms. Say whatever you want, I do not care and am prepared for the shit, but I got big into anarchistic economics as an undergrad and the police state we live in just isn’t something I ethically jive with. I personally, morally and ethically, am completely against the current law enforcement system from top to bottom and believe there are a million better ways to do it.
That being said, I get paid to do a job, not espouse my personal beliefs to senior bankers and upper level management who know a fuck ton more than I do. As such, and truly in my opinion the only correct answer, is to keep your mouth shut. If it’s something that goes against your religion, I’d argue differently as religious freedom is entirely important but there are few, if any, cases where that would come up (A sell-side of Porn Hub if you took a vow a celibacy, a cap raise for Only Fans if you’re a conservative Muslim, a buy-side involving Kanye West if you’re Jewish, etc. all imaginary but plausible and grounds for concern). 99% of the time what you do in that case, is your job; as an analyst, your job is to serve the client and turn powerpoint slides not raise the ethics of companies enabling and profiting off of alcohol/gambling addictions. There is an argument to be made at the Director/MD level about not pitching/accepting the mandate, but I don’t think that’s the question here.
There is an actual ethical dilemma in high finance in general to be raised about the actual economic value creation of our work, but that ties back to a lot of fundamentally communist belief that very few, if anyone, in finance subscribes to. This definitely is a thought provoking question and does raise a bit of a pandoras box about compromising your personal beliefs for a check, but in general it would be entirely rare for most of us.
Let me guess. You went to Brown?
We had a staffer once who didn't want to work on a deal based on their ethnic identity/religion. It was a defense deal (not even a big one) and the relevant colleagues' family was living in the affected region that would be "impacted" by the funding/weapons/other.
Our management moved him to a different group and that was it.
And those kind of deals weren't even that common to begin with.
I play three games (four, but mainly three) in my head that are below:
1. how my friends afford their lifestyle
2. how a business stays solvent
3. where you/someone "draws the line".
Where you draw the line is a fun game because you can play it for other people or for yourself; meaning, say someone says they won't spend $100 on healthy food because its "too expensive" but easily blow past that at the bar; I see where you draw the line.
Point I'm relating back to is, at OP, with work like this, it becomes a game of where you draw the line. As people said above, its about the business not about the morals. For most businesses you can point to an ugly side to it. For example, gambling, I'd assume someone would object because someone can become addicted to it and most people who gamble can't afford to lose that money in the first place. What about say an apparel company, such as Lululemon, yes, you can't get addicted (maybe shopping addiction), but Lulu knows they are most likely selling some leggings to people who probably should be buying clothes at cheaper places; which in a way is the same as gambling, you run business where you know you shouldn't be taking some people's money but you do anyway. Probably same with say Starbucks; overpriced and probably contribute to obesity. Maybe you object to all things above, maybe some, maybe none. My point is, if you go up or down the chain enough you'll find something you're against. Im not saying dont have morals, definitely stand up for what you believe in, don't do anything illegal, but realize the world will keep turning.
*pulled out