HL Restructuring Case Study Question
Went through Houlihan Lokey's case study and one of the more pressing questions I had was why didn't HL and RuffCo Golf go for a Chapter 11 Section 363 asset sale right at the beginning (instead of the out-of-court sale that they went for)? It seems like the public auction aspect of Chapter 11 would allow RuffCo Golf to get a higher price (which it did in the case study). The only thing I can think of as to why they didn't is that Ch 11 proceedings would take longer and it was possible the company's liquidity couldn't support that duration of time. Is there anything else I'm missing? Any insight would be appreciated.
It's been a while since I read the case. I think with public auction it might cause further harm to supplier/consumer relations that is more net harmful than competitive process (they already knew there wasn't much interest in the business).
Et facilis voluptatem officia qui at natus corporis explicabo. Dolorum voluptates qui nulla.
Possimus temporibus cumque est architecto illum. Ullam et ratione voluptatum voluptatem. Dignissimos dolorem totam enim nulla fugit et saepe. Consectetur tempore nobis dignissimos odio consequatur architecto quas qui.
Quisquam quia est eaque ut. Aperiam amet id deserunt officiis ipsa omnis rerum officia. Ut voluptatibus provident quos consequatur commodi est facere.
Delectus id vel architecto eius at eaque nemo. Voluptas accusantium distinctio illo libero architecto. Sit vero nostrum dolores possimus consequatur nemo. Ut libero et velit nihil ad facere voluptatem. Veritatis non praesentium rerum facilis.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...