How are deals originated & banks chosen?

How're banks chosen to lead deals? Maybe boutiques charge less? Why wouldn't companies go to BB and EBs only since they have the most contacts? I'm assuming boutique MDs have contacts and they can lead/co-lead because of that? Is it all relationship based? Appreciate any insight

Edit: all types of deals IPOs, M&A, etc

4 Comments
 
Most Helpful

It is a combination of expertise, which mouth needs to be fed, and ensuring the company has multiple banks lined up if it needs to (ie, relationship management). After 2008 lots off companies realized that they can't always rely on a single bank to supply credit in a downturn. This means they need multiple banks to form a bank group so they have multiple relationship banks (big full service banks with large balance sheets) to bank them simultaneously. Banks make very little money off of balance sheet lending, so they demand that clients give them capital markets takes (issuing debt, equity, financing their acquisitions, and providing M&A advice). This is why so many shitty banks have ECM and DCM teams these days. They are able to because they force their clients to use their services. 

Now you're probably wondering, ok, what about the boutiques which have basically no balance sheet? This is more of the advisory stuff where expertise comes into play. Expertise includes having connections to find a buyer when one is needed or a seller when one is needed. Additionally, sometimes the big banks are conflicted and can't assist (maybe they already bank one of the parties, or maybe in a restructuring, they are a lender to the BK company etc). Now why doesn't KKR just choose one elite boutique and call it a day? For one, no one EB is the best at any everything. Sponsors also have to interact with their target's advisor when they are trying to acquire. Their target's advisor may occasionally be their advisor. When multiple sponsors make offers to a target, with different terms and such, they want to have a good relationship with that sell-side advisor so their bid "gets to the top of the pile," so to speak. Obviously, if one bid is way at the top, that firm is going to get it. But, what I the bids are pretty much the same, but have different terms and conditions. If that sell-side advisor can count on you for future buy-side mandates, maybe they'll nudge their client in your direction. All these things play a role in different banks getting deals completed. Sponsors like lots of competent M&A advisors hanging around. This creates competition and compresses fees.

 

Ipsam autem sed dolores quo laudantium ducimus odio. Est inventore nulla totam enim quis est fugiat. Natus reiciendis quidem corporis. Asperiores voluptates beatae ut dicta. Officia rerum optio rerum necessitatibus itaque ratione.

Career Advancement Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 04 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (17) $409
  • Associates (58) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (29) $183
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (77) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”