How Bad Should We Want Goldman?

Is it safe to say we should not quit until we land Goldman? If we got a BB summer internship we should not relax until we get Goldman? Is Goldman fully worth us spending our summer internships and first couple months in senior year working on our interview skills for Goldman?

 

I doubt it. If so, why would he pepper his speech with exclamation marks and substitute "tell" for "say"? As it stands, it is a perfect (if not terribly PC) parody of a not-terribly-with-it immigrant who glorifies aspects of the culture without understanding them.

 

As elegant and spare as your conversation is, my friend, I'm afraid I don't get much data out of "...". Was that a typo, or perhaps some kind of trolling tactic I've never seen before?

 

Student22: ;-) in which bank are you?

Mis Ind: In bank I am which you do not know need to. Please to understand I Goldman offer turned down LAME because it was.

Student22: You are pathetic

 

However, as you can see, my good friend has clearly been taught to avoid ending sentences with "in", "on", or "of". His obsolete (for America) context was a result of that avoidance. Bravo, my friend. Flawless grammar this time.

 

I want you to be Goldman's troll when you're slaving away at 3AM on Friday/Saturday night and your buddies are out partying. Every BB is a good name and you'll have a great experience. No need to kiss GS's ass and put down everyone else.

 

I have great experience summer internship with Goldman. I very much enjoy being mishandled and treated like dirty cattle by disorganized bimbo HR women with bad attitude and degree not worth wiping ass with. Work schedule and lifestyle though was the same as any other investment bank, except maybe slightly more asshole and slightly less... how do you say... collegiallate atmosphere? Still, experience with HR women stood out most for me. They truly defined my summer experience! They are truly unlike any other!

 

I looked at Student22's other posts. I wouldn't be suprised if he stood outside of Goldman's office asking for autographs. You are a bit too infatuated with that firm young fella. Go play some X-Box and take it down 1000! SHEESH! You should be here learning, not campaigning for a firm that probably doesn't know you exist...

 
A_Bathing_Ape:
I wouldn't be suprised if he stood outside of Goldman's office asking for autographs.
Man, I just got a mental picture of that. Standing outside 85 Broad at lunchtime asking every analyst that passes by for an autograph. That's hilarious.

I think some analyst who just pulled an all-nighter would probably kick him in the balls.

 

It's funny. People I know at Goldman take a much more humble approach. Mainly because they know being #1 doesn't last forever, and all it takes is 1 bad trade or deal for everything to change in a sense.

 

I think the Goldman craze is hilarious. It's only among college students though. People in the industry know the real deal, and that Goldman is not for everyone.

 

i actually do not believe for a second that ms. ind turned down a goldman offer. 0 percent chance.

its funny how much people lie on this site - there's really no way to check the things people say, so i guess it's not suprising.

to the original poster: goldman is in a league of its own. that said, other banks out there are good as well - just try to get goldman, and if it doesnt work out, shoot for MS. after that, keep going down the league tables. heavy dealflow is the best way to learn.

 
Best Response

Oh, look... it's a brand new account, but the poster clearly has experience with the site. I wonder who this person is? Guesses?

I did turn down a Goldman offer. What makes that so unbelievable? Do you just not believe that Goldman offers ever get turned down? They do. Several posters here will back that up. Goldman is not the best in everything. Goldman is a very good firm in a bracket of very good firms, and dealflow/expertise varies from year to year within that bracket. For instance: in what I do, my firm tops Goldman consistently in many areas. Hell, in some products, Goldman doesn't even show up on the league tables.

Also, as far as I know, I'm the only person on this site who has taken steps to verify who I am and what I do. Check the old posts in "Monkeying Around"; I posted some excellent photographic evidence for some college folks who just couldn't get over their assumptions.

 
Mis Ind:
Oh, look... it's a brand new account, but the poster clearly has experience with the site. I wonder who this person is? Guesses?

I did turn down a Goldman offer. What makes that so unbelievable? Do you just not believe that Goldman offers ever get turned down? They do. Several posters here will back that up. Goldman is not the best in everything. Goldman is a very good firm in a bracket of very good firms, and dealflow/expertise varies from year to year within that bracket. For instance: in what I do, my firm tops Goldman consistently in many areas. Hell, in some products, Goldman doesn't even show up on the league tables.

Also, as far as I know, I'm the only person on this site who has taken steps to verify who I am and what I do. Check the old posts in "Monkeying Around"; I posted some excellent photographic evidence for some college folks who just couldn't get over their assumptions.

Listen, unless you're in real estate, there's no reason to go anywhere but Goldman for investment banking. I would love to get more specific - why don't you tell us what you do? It's easy to say 'In what I do, my firm tops Goldman consistently in many areas.'

 

Are you even in banking yet? It doesn't look like it based on your narrow-minded comments. If you want to only M&A, GS doesn't have such a group. In that case, you'd be more inclined to go to MS or any other "2nd tier bank" like UBS/CS/JPM that has a dedicated group.

If you're interested in Lev. Fin, GS is defintely not the best at that.

 

Although I have no comments on Mis Ind's status and situation, I agree with what she says. Plenty of people turn down Goldman. To say that GS is in a league of its own is simply stupid, because they are good at some things and not so much / at all in others. There are lots of specific groups at other firms that I would prefer over the gs counterpart. Do your research, find something you're interested in doing, and aim for the firm that does that best. You want to do m&a, go ms, you want to do generalist, go UBS la, you want to do re, go DB, you want to do TMT, go gs. Without a guaranteed top group at goldman, you really aren't much better off than if you went to another firm.

 

I'm not stating the name of my bank or my group here. No banker does that, and for good reason.

While turning Goldman down for its deeply substandard performance on some league tables might have been valid for me, I actually turned Goldman down for a very different reason. As a summer analyst, I was mishandled by program coordinators. There was precious little mobility or flexibility, insufficient focus on the quality of our summer experience, and an unwillingness to help us seriously learn more (aside from "deep dive" lectures that stayed pretty shallow) about various options available to us. Moreover, the people in charge of the program were extremely strict about every aspect and detail of what was required of us, and yet they consistently screwed up their end of things due to disorganization or simple lack of focus. They also consistently, openly reminded us of their power over us and the fact that we wouldn't get an offer if for any reason they didn't like us. Moreover, and perhaps most importantly, the attitude was just awful. Not so much among the senior bankers I met, but among the rank-and-file analysts and (ironically) worst of all among the HR people and the recruiters. Why is it that the people who don't drive the revenues feel the right to be so haughty? It was as if they were saying, "Yeah, I may have a Jersey accent and a degree from a bad state school, and I may not know revenues from assets, but I work at Goldman, dammit, Goldman Sachs, and you're gonna kiss my ring for it."

At any rate, I did the requisite tomfoolery to get the offer, but the moment a comparable bank made an offer as well, I jumped at it and didn't look back. My choice of bank, also, was not a mistake. My choice of group... well... heh.

 

"Ms. Ind, what drawbacks could there be to telling us what bank your at? If it's a top bank, it's got thousands of employees. It's not like anyone will be able to figure out who you are. To be completely honest, I don't actually believe you work at an I-bank. You post so much on this site. I agree there is downtime at work, but not as much as you clearly have. Anyways, most legit banks block access to websites such as this one."

My friend, I gotta call you out. You have no idea what you're talking about.

First, any investment bank -- and the Wall Street IB scene in general -- functions a lot like a smallish town in terms of how fast word gets around. I'm an analyst, I'm engaged, I ride a Vespa, I'm loud and unusual. This makes me unique already. Many people already know who I am and where I am. No need to make it easier.

Second, access to this site has clearly not been blocked, as I am posting from work.

Third, check out my credentials in the "Monkeying Around" folder before you continue to suggest I'm not a banker. I've supplied ample photographic evidence for my bankerhood there. The only person on this site to do so as of yet, I believe.

All due respect, "Mr. Banker", as much as I'm sure you're enjoying your work there at Goldman Sachs where you assuredly hold a very high position, you haven't been on this board long enough to know what's what and who's who. Stick around. Learn a little. You're clearly not an unintelligent person, so stop respewing what you've read online.

 

i took a look at the monkeying around forum and still question whether or not you are being honest. i don't think a photo of a trophy with the statue of liberty in the background proves anything. if you really are a banker and those things are yours, then im sorry you decide to spend your small amounts of free time taking strange photos of assorted goods to post online.

my only point is that people should take what you say with a grain of salt because there is as yet not any evidence that you are being honest. when you bash goldman, which in my honest opinion should be everyones first choice bank, youre leading people who don't know much astray. what if someone ends up turning down goldman because they read your post? goldman still opens more doors than any other bank and it would be a mistake to turn it down. please be considerate of other people - youre giving them advice and there's a chance they may actually take it

 
mr.banker:
i took a look at the monkeying around forum and still question whether or not you are being honest. i don't think a photo of a trophy with the statue of liberty in the background proves anything. if you really are a banker and those things are yours, then im sorry you decide to spend your small amounts of free time taking strange photos of assorted goods to post online.
Do you realize how screwed up and circular your logic is?

First, you accuse someone of being a fraud and question whether or not they are who they say they are. That person then proves it to you, and you accuse them of not having better things to do with their time.

This is an online forum.. No one has to prove themselves to you. But if you're really up for it, let's see your employee ID and driver's license with the SSN clearly visible.

 
mr.banker:
i took a look at the monkeying around forum and still question whether or not you are being honest. i don't think a photo of a trophy with the statue of liberty in the background proves anything. if you really are a banker and those things are yours, then im sorry you decide to spend your small amounts of free time taking strange photos of assorted goods to post online.

Man, who the f*ck are you to ask anyone to identify themselves or judge anyone ?

Why the f*ck should anyone on this anon message board offer you any evidence as to who they are ?

If you doubt someone's credibility, then don't read their posts and move the fck on instead of harassing them and accusing them of being fake. For all we know you could be a fckin janitor at Goldman.

 

Sorry but by the way you describe it, it almost sounds like you are bitter towards the company and it really is hard to believe the internship was that horrendous as you describe it so I have trouble believing you were an intern.

 

I agree with Seanc. Stop questioning Mis Ind. She's one of a handful of bankers who have not left the board yet. She's been more helpful than most people who claim to work in the industry.

 
alstmdrll:
I agree with Seanc. Stop questioning Mis Ind. She's one of a handful of bankers who have not left the board yet. She's been more helpful than most people who claim to work in the industry.

I couldn't agree with this more. This board has really deteriorated with threads like "Why do non-targets even try?" and "How bad should we want Goldman"

 

Goldman will give you an incredible step up for recruiting. E.g. headhunters have been compiling lists of 1st year analysts for PE/hedge fund exit opportunities - they will go through and meet with pretty much everybody from goldman (+ few other select top groups/boutiques such as MS M&A, Greenhill, Gleacher, Lazard, CS sponsors, UBS/CS LA) before moving on to the 2nd tier banks/groups. Having said this it is very possible to get to the same place without the Goldman name - it's just more difficult.

you should also realize that without certain names on your resume, certain places may not even meet with you (or the odds are slim enough to be close to zero). E.g. LGP and CS/UBS LA, or H&F and GS/MS

 

Mr. Banker, if your argument is that people do not know what industry in ibd they want to concentrate in right after college, then logically the place to go would not be goldman but UBS/cs la.

 

People really need to chill with the personal attacks on this site. I've only known about it for about a month now, and it's really disheartening to see people who actually know what they're talking about getting insulted. This forum is only as good as the people giving out advice, so lay off people. People go through the time and effort to post here, they could easily be doing other things with their time. It's an internet forum. Take a chill pill.

 

I come here once in a while and can't believe how ridiculous some people on this forum are. I thought everyone at a target knows that plenty of people turn down Goldman. They don't have anywhere near perfect yield. There are so many reasons to turn them down--fit, location, personalities, etc.

 

Meebs, thanks, I agree.

Guys, let's keep the responses on topic if possible. If you don't believe someone or doubt their credibility, just ignore thier advice or state a counter argument.

i think we're all old enough to realize everything in these forums should be taken with a grain of salt...at least until someone proves to be a worthy source of information.

there have been many finance professionals giving out great advice on these forums for almost a year now. i've had to increase the # of moderators recently because I couldn't handle all the crap that starting coming into the forums. I plan on giving my more mature users modertor privileges to keep the forums useful.

I don't want to stifle a lively debate, but personal attacks and off topic tirades are not going to be tolerated. (and if you cross the line twice, your username will be blocked...just ask Dan Bush or RogueBanker)

Thanks.

 

i figured it out. i've been trying to figure out how ms. ind is able to post so much on this website while still working at an I-bank. finally, it hit me - she's in HR. it's settled. i will tolerate no more discussion on this topic. do not speak of it. ms. ind is in HR.

 

I'm a newbie here and already my first impression is that people are quite abrasive...fun stuff. Anyway I know someone whose son wants to go to Goldman and tried applying numerous times, year after year. They rejected his application and he still wants to get employed there. I've worked for one of the tier 1 i-bks, not saying you can't get in via the normal route but you get a chance to interview if you know somebody - mind you they still grill you in the interview process. The poor kid just doesn't get it. Wonder how many of you got in via a friend?

 

Having contacts makes it easier to get the interview and get the job, banking is networking.

Off course that guy applies year after year. He is determined to succeed and get in GS. Even if he gets into MS/ML etc he probably will still try to change to GS at a certain time.

Do you know why GS is the global recognized market leader, because all people at GS are extremely proud and extremely motivated and GS really recruits the best of the best, which you cannot find at any other firm on this planet.

BTW, that moron waiting for a MS lover, you won't find it. If you are in competition do you want to be the champion or the 1st runner-up? I think everybody wants to be the champion and therefore chooses GS. Every single ambitious person who worked his/ her ass off at nontarget/target uni wants GS, this holds for US/EU/Asia! Therefore GS gets the best of the best and you can really have the best experiences at GS from the best people.

 

Student22, what is it with you? I just don't get it? I'm new to this board and I come here to get information. Student22, why do 100% of your posts refer to Goldman and you love to say "The Culture of Success" which is the title of a book written Lisa Endlich about Goldman (Which obviously you read or heard about) and "They're the market leader" which overall as a firm is probably true, but as has been posted on this message board thousands of times is not universal across every group and industry within the firm. I just don't get how you benefit or enjoy plugging Goldman every chance you get. Fill me in. Do you get paid or something everytime you plug the firm? What is the point? If you know "Goldman is the best at everything, even their janitors clean the toilets better than MS's janitors" then there is no reason for you to be here. You know everything you need to know! Go apply at GS and tell every firm to go to hell. And if that is the case then please stop posting cuz if I see "They're the market leader...Culture if success" one more time I'm gonna throw my computer out the window! ENOUGH ALREADY!!!

 

Thanks, guys. You've saved me the effort of refuting these kids (circularity, Goldman's flawlessness or lack thereof, etc.). I actually have stuff to do this morning (quelle horreur!) as well.

 

I still think this Student22 guy has got to be pulling a colossal joke on us. I mean, how could he be serious? There's no point to any of his statements -- they're just absurd arguments that seem to exist solely to be laughed at by everyone on this board. It's as if he's distilled all of the worst attitudes and beliefs on this board, subtracted fifty IQ points, and added some sort of stereotypical immigrant accent. This is clearly satire. Particularly since he hasn't clued in to how he's being received here.

As to his constant PMing of me... well, maybe he thinks that I, being a satirist myself, will enjoy private performances of his real gems. I don't really enjoy it, but I'm hoping he'll understand that shortly.

 

Do a search of his posts, I think he's 100% serious. Every post I have seen has said "Goldman... Market Leader... Culture of Success". I really think he doesn't know anything about Banking but he saw Goldman on top of some ranking so he tries to act as if he's informed on the industry. There is no evidnece of any other conclusion. He's never even made a comment about why he thinks other banks aren't as good, it's always "Goldman is the best, nobody else compares" because he doesn't know enough to make a legit case about why it's better than any other bank. At least Mr Banker made some informed opinions. When somebody said "Goldman doesn't even have an M&A group" he countered with "What undergrad is sure what they actually want to do", and "There's no guarantee you'll get into M&A at MS" and he mentioned a good alternative to GS not having an M&A group. He sounds like he knows what he's talking about. All Student22 says is "they're the best!!" but never can say why. If it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then...

 

That's really depressing, dude. You're damaging my faith in humanity here.

I think I'm going to keep believing that he's a brilliant satirist who just doesn't know when to quit. I can handle a lot of dumbassitude, but I can't handle believing that this guy is for real AND that he's a H. Sapiens.

 

What I find really funny is that this kid Student22, is really scared that he won't be given a FT offer by Goldman after his summer internship, it's quite hilarious actually.

Student22, If I were you I wouldn't run my mouth too much on this board, you never know who might be reading....

 

I'm going to agree with Mis Ind here. However, the fact that student22 doesn't know when to quit certainly detracts from his brilliance...

The kid is actually working for GS this summer? Hilarious. I hope he keeps us updated on his daily experiences with the The Culture of Success.

 

Could this kid be working for GS this summer? I'm not so sure. However, if he is, if he's got the same summer program people that I had... oh, that's delicious.

I was very happy to see that, at my bank, the analyst program people and recruiters are young, bright, funny people who don't take themselves too seriously and who understand that their job is to support the revenue-producing functions of the bank. I've actually spent time with them of my own accord because they're just fun to hang around. It's a nice difference from the harridans I met at GS.

 

Guys, on this topic, check "Monkeying Around" for a verbatim transcription of a journal entry I found in Ulysses a few days ago. Same guy? You be the judge.

 

Velit odit qui sed consequatur dolores modi rerum. Eligendi nesciunt ut qui aut velit.

Pariatur voluptatem alias est maxime neque id nihil eligendi. Aut qui inventore deserunt officiis et ad quasi. Quidem aut molestias aut expedita. Delectus ut at sed qui voluptatum ut. Et ut a eveniet non et et velit. Dicta optio temporibus vel sint qui.

Illo at dolores optio ad. Et quia voluptatem natus in ipsa. Odio laudantium corrupti ducimus cum consequatur error dolorum.

 

Est dolore corrupti rem at. Voluptatem qui commodi quaerat vel ut laboriosam commodi. Qui est voluptatum voluptas voluptatem consequatur vel natus.

Modi aut rerum quas reprehenderit vitae. Et enim quos molestiae velit. Est aperiam et ipsam illo modi.

Ipsum tempora aperiam et quibusdam illo suscipit. Soluta consequatur hic fuga quas eius sunt. Eaque minus exercitationem pariatur velit enim quia quis unde.

 

Sit velit praesentium explicabo ducimus. Iusto ea adipisci quam. Tempora ut ea et in culpa.

Reprehenderit corporis autem eius laborum et excepturi veritatis. Soluta illo et accusantium tenetur praesentium. Ipsum assumenda enim molestias perferendis doloribus nam ut.

Nobis cupiditate ea vitae assumenda. Non id beatae quo corrupti qui molestiae quis voluptas.

Itaque labore atque voluptatum consectetur et temporibus. Amet eius doloribus praesentium eum.

 

Velit praesentium vel rerum ipsam. Sint et ipsum et vel. Fugiat delectus omnis ut reiciendis et fuga. Iusto veniam eligendi fugiat qui excepturi et itaque.

Beatae illum autem aliquid ut sint nihil nulla. Quam sint sit nesciunt quasi quia. Labore qui ipsa maxime ullam laboriosam quod aut.

Voluptatum at rem harum optio nemo. Sunt veritatis et sunt similique non omnis dolor. Et doloribus aut sit quo molestiae voluptatum.

A consequuntur vel pariatur aut quaerat aut. Sequi et consequuntur aut sunt tenetur eveniet omnis.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 04 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (20) $385
  • Associates (88) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (67) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”