How did your MBA Summer Associate Recruiting go?

Now that a lot of offers are being extended (Jan 10 @ 5pm) - how did recruiting go for you? Happy with the results?

Edit: Per LakerBanker's suggestion - it would be helpful to list your tier of school (M7, T15, etc.).

 

What school do you go to/undergrad gpa/GMAT score? Also what was your pre MBA work experience, and what do you think are the main reasons for not receiving any offers yet? Lack of networking, rusty technicals, bad undergrad gpa?

 

dude. stop posting the same question over and over again. Here's my experience. during banking interviews, they really focused on my undergrad GPA, they wanted undergrad GPA by major, by class, and asked me for my grades coming out of pass/no pass classes too, and asked me to recalculated my GPA on the spot, without a calculator. it sucked. it was the hardest technical question ever.

 

First round interviews with 6 banks and made it to 3 Superdays. Haven't received an offer yet, though I did get "wait listed" at my top choice bank.

But I think I lucked out. I have a first round interview coming up (Corp Fin) with a company that I am incredibly excited about in a city that I know I can settle down in. At this point, I would probably be happier working for that company and having a nice life/solid comp/great benefits, than "chasing the dream" in IB. Maybe it's for the best?

 

Top 15, background in asset management, good grades/GMAT.

9 super day invites (6 BB, 3 MM) but due to overlap could only do 4, received 3 offers. Turned down BBs for a MM. Very fortunate.

While big portion of group was successful, others who seemed equally (or more) qualified struck out or are waiting. Hearing that offers are down overall. Majority received 2-3 super days and 1-2 offers. Hoping some friends still get calls as dominoes fall in the coming weeks.

 

A few seemed relatively random (which is scary) but for the majority who struggled it came down to personality.

Associate level on up they want to get somebody who is smart, but the greater emphasis will be on client interaction. The surprise to me was how little an advantage a top undergrad/work experience earned you vs. being able to demonstrate likability and networking well.

 

Not sure this is what they meant, but when I recruited I ranked in my head through a combo of:

Bucket 1) Resume-type credentials (work experience/GMAT/undergrad institution/GPA)

Bucket 2) Personality/networking (can this person hold a conversation easily, make light jokes, interact with peers and bankers)

Example of a bucket 1 peer I know who struck out: top 15 undergrad with honors, CFA, consulting background, 720 GMAT. He had all the resume credentials you could want, but found networking and interaction difficult.

Bucket 2 peer came from a non-target undergrad (with mediocre scores/grades) and had worked in tech sales, but could strike up a conversation easily. Extremely personable. She was wait listed at first (clearly they had concerns about the quant aspect of the gig) but eventually got an offer.

If you had only seen the resumes, bucket 1 peer would have been picked 10/10 times.

Personally, I was a combo, but much stronger in bucket 2 than bucket 1. I had unimpressive work experience and undergrad prestige--but good grades, a strong GMAT, and interacting with people comes fairly easily. I did much better than peers who had better bucket 1 credentials.

 

MBA business schools">M7 student here who struck out - as did about 30% of my class who seriously recruited until the very end. It was mostly international males (myself included) who ended up without offers. No correlation to talent/effort or language/accent/culture though.

Personally, I got 5 first-rounds and 4 superdays at top BBs and EBs mostly in SF. Got rejected everywhere.

Recruiting numbers are significantly down at my school and, anecdotally, at other schools as well. It’s a nightmare to be honest.

 
Business School in IB - Ind:
MBA business schools">M7 student here who struck out - as did about 30% of my class who seriously recruited until the very end. It was mostly international males (myself included) who ended up without offers. No correlation to talent/effort or language/accent/culture though.

Personally, I got 5 first-rounds and 4 superdays at top BBs and EBs mostly in SF. Got rejected everywhere.

Recruiting numbers are significantly down at my school and, anecdotally, at other schools as well. It’s a nightmare to be honest.

if youyre getting 4 superdays then being international isnt the reasib fir no offer

 

Thanks for coming here half a year later to shit on me while not even taking the time to put together a straight sentence. I never claimed I was perfect, but my basic premise still holds: all domestic students got offers (though not all necessarily at BB/EB) and those who struck out were exclusively international. This forum sometimes makes it seem like IB recruiting at the MBA level is a piece of cake and those who don’t get anything are internationals with thick accents, major cultural issues and/or body odor. My point is that this is not true and some people are just shit out of luck.

 

When I applied to school I knew what MBA business schools">M7 included, and what S16 schools were, but how do I reconcile T15 with S16? What's that one special school that's always considered THE #16? Anderson? Darden?

 
Most Helpful

I am a second year at a MBA business schools">M7 heading into a top NY BB. As part of the IB club I tracked IB recruiting data in detail for Class of 20 (intern, FT) and 21 (intern only) in my school. Here's a complete picture for you.

On a macro level, numbers are going down gradually each year, because 1) the industry in total just don't need as many people. That's just a general trend, but at the same time, 2) across all top schools, talent pipelines shrink simultaneously, because way more people now want to recruits for consulting (higher base salary than IB, work few hours, get your weekend, and MBB name carries more prestige than, say, ugh, Moelis/PJT/Evercore because who the f have ever heard of those names). Evidence: across your top finance schools, McKinsey or BCG (sorry Bain) are bound to be the top recruiting firm, pretty much no exception.

Now, in general, as MBA business schools">M7 student, you have 80-85% success rate at landing a good IB offer. Here's the insight that I found by cutting the data multiple ways, if you have English-speaking developed economy work experience (this is a key, Ivy league undergrads are the exceptions, they can work in Kenya and still get a shit ton of offers, also women almost always get offers), YOU have 95% plus success rate at landing at one of your top three choices in the US. That special 5% is reserved for people who cannot crack the technicals, or are socially awkward, or assholes who sharpelbow other candidates during recruiting. On the other end of the spectrum, if you DON'T have English-speaking developed economy work experience, your rate is 70%-75%. A lot of people have confidence issue, cultural issue, language issue, dress code issue, body odor issue. Some people say visa is the issue, I disagree, because now all top MBAs offer STEM degrees. The key really comes down to, let me say it again, English-speaking developed economy work experience. One of the Indian candidate I worked with was a brilliant guy. Smart, polite, finance savvy, IIT graduate, but he was soft speaking. He did not get anywhere because he was soft speaking, but got Google and Facebook PM role. Super awesome guy. This is the reality of US IB Associate recruiting. It's more like a fraternity pledging process.

 

Excellent overview and largely in line with my experience as a first-year. I do agree with everything but one statement: “confidence issue, cultural issue, language issue, dress code issue, body odor issue” are real for some people, but those got hit with reality fast and in some cases did not even get first round interviews. However, at my school at least there were a bunch of folks who were just unlucky and didn’t receive offers despite being technically strong, having proper appearance and a near-native level command of English. It’s just substantially harder for international males, period. STEM or not, a bunch of banks do not consider internationals at all, so the list is smaller to begin with. Then there are banks who officially hire internationals and say so, but unofficially they don’t. Add all that together and there are some people who get unlucky despite not being smelly and quirky. Similarly, while all Americans at my school got offers, many did not get their top (three) choices. It’s a competitive process and I’ve seen HYPSM grads go to MM banks as well (and not by choice).

My point is just that — at least at my school (M7) — the notion on this forum that you just walk into the process and pick your offer is unrealistic. Most people will get an offer, most definitely all American who seriously follow the process will get an offer, but not necessarily at their top choice.

 

Appreciate the insight. Since you mentioned it, can you shed some light on which banks officially claim to hire internationals, but don't actually do so? Have heard that Canadian banks (RBC, BMO) and a couple boutiques (Greenhill and Guggenheim), don't take internationals, but genuinely curious to know which others. Thanks in advance

 

Speaking as a 2nd year going to a BB from a T20 school. Overall we got more offers than last year. Some new banks came on campus because of how well my class placed so that helped. However, I saw the same trend as people mentioned above, international students had 0 success at my school. It’s already a competitive process to begin with but even harder when cultural/social things along with visa/sponsorship issues get in the way during networking and recruiting. Congrats to everyone that got offers.

 

Dolorum debitis tempore vel similique iste officia. Velit vitae commodi qui voluptates. Qui quod voluptatem non necessitatibus ratione.

Array
 

Aut excepturi odio culpa harum est cum maiores. Nisi asperiores dolor architecto exercitationem pariatur qui. Delectus aspernatur quasi velit molestiae quaerat saepe.

Qui corporis enim molestiae sed pariatur. Pariatur quibusdam officiis saepe est enim. Distinctio expedita dolor et recusandae dolor non. Totam quisquam minima excepturi impedit.

Qui pariatur libero consequatur. Excepturi voluptas voluptatum repellendus doloribus soluta exercitationem. Ea nulla et similique consequatur odit voluptatem. Et enim maxime rerum in.

Mollitia tempore sunt sunt harum quia. Et officiis provident in ut eos ullam. Tenetur dolorem modi velit nemo natus vel. Impedit consequatur ipsam itaque omnis maxime delectus.

 

Nihil earum eum quis. Laboriosam dolorem sapiente iure porro qui qui. Exercitationem autem atque est. Quia eaque iure adipisci. Id sed necessitatibus similique magnam rerum. Sed nostrum ut aliquid eveniet.

Non sint laboriosam qui quo voluptatem nesciunt dignissimos. Cupiditate non est maxime. Est molestias dolores fugiat excepturi ut delectus.

Tempore laborum qui ea corrupti aspernatur odio. Eaque occaecati esse officia ut tempore temporibus fugit esse.

Neque aut omnis consequuntur nesciunt praesentium quidem. Nesciunt voluptatibus autem id quod optio. Dolores modi consectetur consectetur dolorem est similique. Asperiores qui similique numquam nemo unde in. Eaque minima dolor voluptatem dolor rerum sed atque. Exercitationem deserunt corporis ut quisquam.

 

Aut est molestias natus et veniam autem omnis. Voluptas officiis quo mollitia aut et. Omnis provident rerum vero commodi hic delectus harum.

Consequatur voluptas exercitationem doloremque dolorem. Beatae consequatur voluptatem esse quis. Et est qui porro minus velit minima aut.

Dolorem voluptatibus exercitationem a optio aut ut beatae. Nostrum non quisquam repellat sit quasi. Perspiciatis ducimus quia odit dicta earum optio totam.

Veniam iure sed quia quam omnis possimus ut. Nihil officia vero repellat sed necessitatibus. Ipsum quia ea molestias id consequatur in et. Itaque facilis assumenda tenetur quasi. Ipsum autem aliquam enim minus aut velit. Provident laboriosam dignissimos voluptate nisi. Molestiae illo velit iste aut expedita.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”