How does the employment background check/verification process work?

For background, I recently superday'd with a firm I'd like to work for... thought I killed it... but got rejected and no interviewer responded when I asked for feedback.

My biggest concern is that I was laid off while interviewing, but didn't tell the people I was interviewing with and I think it might have come up in the background check. I was laid off due to company downsizing, not performance, and each MD had offered to write me a letter of recommendation upon request.

This might not have been the reason I was rejected, but I've never been so confident walking out of an interview so it makes the most sense to me.

With that said, a few additional questions regarding background checks and employment verifications:

  • At what point in the process does the employment verification take place? I assume post-interview?

  • What does the employment verification entail?

  • Any horror stories / general thoughts?

Thanks

 
Best Response

In my experience, the BG check process is little more than some 3rd party (which may not even be based in the US) calling the numbers you provide for former employers and confirming you worked there during the dates you claimed, if you are "eligible for rehire" (i.e. were you fired?), and possibly salary. They also check for any criminal offenses, both felonies and misdemeanors. Possibly credit score to the extent you will have access to client funds.

In general, I seriously doubt that's what kept you from an offer. It's not nearly as rigorous as most people seem to think. Unless you're outright lying on your resume (making up jobs, grossly exaggerating salary, etc.) you should be fine.

 

Seems like you're asking about a more informal check where one of your interviewers calls someone at your (formerly) present employer to ask about you. That's totally possible and could very well be a reason you are/were dinged. And if that is what happened, it also makes sense for them to go radio silent afterward. Banks are irrationally afraid of legal liability arising from the interview process, so I assume they'd extra careful about any further correspondence with you if they in fact did an unauthorized check.

That's the risk you took by deciding not to address the layoff in your interviews.

 

Agreed with the last line, though I really don't really think they'd press too much? But I guess if they just asked and found that you just left recently when under OP's application, it was probably listed as "Start Date - Present" and suddenly they found out you left....they might press a little?

But I sorta doubt that would be why OP was dinged.

 

Background checks are usually done after a verbal offer has been extended and accepted. If they don't know if they're gonna hire you or not, it makes no sense to do a complete third party background check which isn't free.

 

Employment verification is part of background check so this too would be done AFTER offer is extended and accepted. In my case, I actually signed my new-hire paper and offer letter. THEN background check started. Took about 5 days including weekends would have been done sooner but I asked HR and they were waiting for courts to respond to the 3rd party service.

 

If the layoff truly wasn't performance related, focus on making that crystal clear. No matter what you do or say, people are still going to think your layoff was at least a little performance related - good analysts are invaluable and don't cost that much. Your job is to minimize this concern by showing (a) extra evidence that you're in factcapable and smart (e.g. acing technicals, smart deal discussions, strong grades) and (b) provide a credible story for why you were canned, with as much evidence as possible.

Of course, if your old team knows you've been dishonest about your employment status with other firms, they'll probably be less enthusiastic about providing a reference.

 

Hi Mikey4591,

A1. Employment verification comes into picture only after finalization of the candidate. Once company has decided to offer a candidate, his/her past employment check is done. Few companies also do this activity after on-boarding the candidate. So, it upto the decision maker or the company policies of that organization.

A2. Employment verification includes reference check, past employment details like tenure, organization name, joining & leaving date, reason of leaving, salary package, designation, existance of the organization, etc.

A3. yeah, there's a story of it. once a person came for interview, get selected but at the time of joining, another person came, who was her twin sister, having all the documents like education certificates, past employment details. She hides everything and tried to inpersonate her sister's identity & her sister was dead that time.

 

Should be fine. They may not be able to verify it, but the it sounds like they would not be told incorrectly that you didn't work there. If they can't get any info from the company, a secondhand source should be fine.

 
zerojb34:
I'm under the assumption that a background check only checks dates of employment right? Two jobs ago I had a job that I listed on my resume that was just a basic sales job at a retail store. I left abruptly to go back to school and I doubt the manager was too pleased with that. That won't affect my background check, right? They just check that I actually worked there?

Nope. You're definitely fired. Sorry. Banks do not tolerate people who were not top performers as 16 year-old employees American Eagle.

(in the future, use the search function)

http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/blog/ib-background-checks-faq

"For all the tribulations in our lives, for all the troubles that remain in the world, the decline of violence is an accomplishment we can savor, and an impetus to cherish the forces of civilization and enlightenment that made it possible."
 
zerojb34:
Haha thanks man. I know it's an illogical worry, just the apprehension that comes with getting a really desired job.

A bit of advice: stop thinking about it. Your job is in the bag for the summer (assuming no outright falsification of employment / education). Enjoy the rest of your school year and check your anxiety at the door when you walk into your new job. It won't help you.

"For all the tribulations in our lives, for all the troubles that remain in the world, the decline of violence is an accomplishment we can savor, and an impetus to cherish the forces of civilization and enlightenment that made it possible."
 

My friend did this. He was very worried about a manager from sophomore year internship who apparently didn't like this lad. Now, my friend's dad is in a C level position at a software firm, and so he got his dad to run a background check on him to make sure that MD wasn't badmouthing him. Nothing happened; the MD maintained his professionalism and confirmed that my friend worked there ... no more, no less.

 

I have called my previous employers. But never pretended to be HR.

The background check is usually conducted by a Private PI hired by the company.

They will for sure, from my experience, call your previous employers.

If you have a bad track record, whether it is false or not, you're screwed.

It's better to call your previous employers, make amends, and ask for their cooperation if the PI called them regarding your background.

 

Hope this thread is still active.

I recently received an offer and I currently am going through the background, reference check etc. The position is an entry level role ( fresh out of undergrad) thus I only have internships available. However, one of my internships was in China (unpaid) and I'm concerned if they will ding me if the third party cannot verify that employment. I have a reference available through WeChat (basically a Chinese messenger) however he is unresponsive / busy.

Any advice or things that could happen to me?

 

I think it is better to leave a gap than to put something when you don't have the reference. I had the same problem with one of my previous home addresses: no proof because I was living at a friend's home abroad for a few months and not paying any bills. Background check was quite annoying and if I had to do it again I would not put this address/experience at all.

 

Quick question. I worked for a boutique a long time ago (only 6 months). I found a better job the same year and started working there. Is it better (for interview and background check purposes) to leave this "shitty"/ boutique experience and put the exact months on my CV or to put only the good brand names, remove the boutique experience and write only the years (ie 2016-2017)?

Second question: if I put the month details during the background check for the third party, do you think HR/the person I interviewed with will look at the detailed background check output (ie they thought I worked more than a year for the good firm but discover it was only 9 months)? Thank you

 

Nemo est incidunt ratione qui id nisi et. Omnis doloremque sed eveniet nemo in. Fuga rerum nostrum fugit tenetur. Laboriosam fugiat quibusdam rerum sed totam id.

Aliquid quidem dolorum sed voluptas. Maxime doloribus sed et quasi sequi recusandae. Magni voluptates optio soluta adipisci.

Vel delectus perferendis unde natus accusantium dolorem. Sequi qui id sint dolore et. Voluptatem placeat eveniet eaque aut voluptatum. Eos sed voluptates rerum nesciunt iste quis et. Consequatur cum debitis est quasi est. Tempore et quis asperiores magnam consequuntur. Necessitatibus illum id qui aliquam.

Sequi praesentium odit voluptates minima. Qui repudiandae hic officiis labore expedita. Doloribus consequuntur molestias repellendus corporis. Delectus officiis beatae est quis.

 

Doloremque iste sapiente nobis vel nihil sint numquam. Molestiae dolor pariatur sit quidem rem. Consequatur excepturi non sequi qui quia cumque. Provident voluptas pariatur enim sapiente velit repellendus. Voluptas molestias voluptas enim explicabo animi sunt.

Eum aut qui a similique quia laboriosam. Eaque quae qui ex consequuntur sit.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”