How to approach SJT

Hi everyone, first of all I am sorry if this is not the appropriate place to ask this question but I wouldn't know where else. 

I am approaching SA recruitment for London, and many firms have SJT tests. Now, I have a clear picture of what are the values that should transpire are, but I'm having trouble understanding how certain tests work. In particular the one offering 2 options (let's say A and B) and a likert scale (slightly agree A, agree A, strongly agree A, same for B, no neutral option). 

Certain question will propose an A and B options that are both valid, but maybe you can recognize that A is slightly better than the B (Note that B is still a perfectly fine option). In these cases, how does the test reason? If I am to pick slightly agree A, does the test interpret that i exclude B, and within the A option I just "slightly agree"? Or the test see my answer as "ok, he chose A because he recognize it as the better option, but he knows B is good as well"?

This is kinda confusing because if the test evaluate only what I say of A or B in situations like this it would be better to put strongly agree, but on the other hand, if it looks at the larger context, strongly agree would show that i disagree completely with B.

Any insights? Thanks.

2 Comments
 

When tackling Situational Judgement Tests (SJTs) with a Likert scale format, like the one you described, it's essential to understand how these tests are designed to evaluate your decision-making and alignment with the firm's values. Based on the most helpful WSO content, here’s how you can approach them:

  1. Understand the Test's Objective: SJTs aim to assess your judgment in workplace scenarios, focusing on traits like collaboration, adaptability, and decision-making under pressure. The test evaluates not just your choice but also the degree of confidence in your decision.

  2. Interpreting the Likert Scale:

    • If both options (A and B) are valid but one is slightly better, selecting "slightly agree A" signals that you recognize A as the better choice while still acknowledging the validity of B.
    • The test does not interpret "slightly agree A" as a complete exclusion of B. Instead, it reflects a nuanced understanding of the scenario, which is often valued in these assessments.
  3. When to Use Strongly Agree:

    • Reserve "strongly agree" for situations where one option clearly aligns with the firm's values or the scenario's demands, and the other option is less appropriate.
    • Avoid overusing "strongly agree" unless you are confident that the option is unequivocally the best choice. Overuse might suggest a lack of critical thinking or an inability to recognize nuance.
  4. Key Strategy:

    • Focus on the firm's core values and the competencies they prioritize (e.g., teamwork, adaptability, leadership).
    • In scenarios where both options are valid, lean towards the one that better reflects these values, even if only slightly.
    • Demonstrate balanced judgment by using the scale to reflect your confidence in the choice without completely dismissing the alternative.
  5. Practice and Preparation:

    • Familiarize yourself with common workplace scenarios and practice identifying the most effective responses.
    • Use resources like SHL/Kenexa practice tests, as mentioned in WSO threads, to get comfortable with the format and reasoning behind these tests.

By approaching the test with a clear understanding of its purpose and aligning your responses with the firm's values, you'll maximize your chances of success. Good luck with your SA recruitment!

Sources: Bank of America Online Assessment Test and Application Process, Barclays Internship Recruitment Process - Business Insight Assessment - Video Interview, How to approach Morgan Stanley’s SJT?, Superday Advice From a Tired Interviewer, Fit/Behavioral Interviews - A Crash Course

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Distinctio consequuntur laudantium sint repellendus cupiditate qui dolore. Adipisci in rerum sed commodi nulla molestiae. Velit illo alias nulla. Ut error aspernatur commodi molestiae. Dolorem assumenda soluta quis quia rerum quia.

Career Advancement Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”