Superday Advice From a Tired Interviewer

Over the past two years I've interviewed over 30 candidates, both during formal super days and for candidates on an accelerated process due to exploding offers. I want to share some inside advice on how I and my fellow interview partners perceive interviewees (and common mistakes), how an established investment bank makes offer/no-offer decisions, and how you can improve your chances of getting an offer. Please take all my shitty tips to your next interview and unite them in a symphony of success and glory. Keep in mind, you don’t need to be number one. A close third will do nicely.


1. How are offer/no-offer decisions made?

This varies from bank to bank. For super days, a random subset of the candidate pool will be interviewed by an interview "team." This is a group of interviewers or interviewer pairs conducting separate interviews with separate questions, but all interview the same subset of the candidate pool. At the end of the day, they discuss as a group, decide if anyone simply doesn't cut it (feedback will be "no offer"), and then FORCE RANK the candidates who meet the minimum.

These discussions are full of all types of personalities: the people who don't really care who is hired, the people who feel an affinity for a certain candidate, the people who only care about how well a candidate did on technicals, the people who "didn't like the interviewee's body language." Being successful is about both appealing to the masses and ensuring you don't heavily irk any single interviewee (like fraternity rush, a blackball is hard to come back from). If someone is vocal about their dislike for you, unless others LOVED you, most will just go with the flow and let that disagreeable person drag you down the rankings (or into the "no offer") category. Remember, interviewers are not always that invested in getting the best candidates, they want to get finished with things and get back to work. 

HR receives these force ranked lists from each interview team and then grabs the top half or whatever threshold they are looking for and sends out offers. There is often a separate HR management system where each interviewer submits a formal review with numerical scores and commentary for each interview he or she conducted. I am not certain what this is used for, but it may come into play for the second round of offers (after people re-neg).

Notice how there is no point where I mentioned heavy reliance on statistics, note-keeping on the part of the interviewers, adjusting interviewer rankings against a control/normalizing rankings, etc. This is not an accurate process. Most interviewers write down a sentence or two and maybe a single numerical score. Don’t think that we are keeping track of some sort of grading system for each question we ask you - we aren’t. It is the sum total of your performance that matters and it will be distilled down to a sentence or two which will be reviewed by the interviewer in the force-rank discussion so they can recall their opinion of you.


2. How do interviewers perceive candidates?

Everything is sex. Someone told me that and I haven't been able to figure out if it is right or wrong, but at least it got your attention. Interviewers perceive candidates through a number of emotions which can help you: trust, respect, enjoyment, being impressed, sympathy, occasionally empathy. They also can view you through less helpful emotions: boredom, disappointment, ennui, anger, self-righteousness, feeling threatened. The point is that people are not fully rational and interpret your candidacy through their own feelings and experiences. There is not much you can do here - it is unlikely you will be able to fully read both your interviewers and cater to their wants, needs, and desires. More on how to prepare for interviews later, but your goal is to cater to the majority, while not offending anyone’s sensitivities or nudging against their pet peeves.

To assist you in this battle, below is a list of complaints I have heard in post interview discussions. Most of these just show how ridiculous interviewers can be.

  1. He looked up too much while he was thinking
  2. Her answers to behavioral questions were all about school/clubs and not about internships
  3. He smiled so much it looked fake
  4. She was too quiet
  5. He fidgeted
  6. She gesticulated too much while talking
  7. He spoke too loudly
  8. She seemed too confident
  9. He tried too hard on the technicals
  10. She memorized the answers to the technicals
  11. He wasn’t very engaging
  12. Her hobbies didn’t seem authentic
  13. He said what he thought we wanted to hear rather than what he felt
  14. She wasn’t confident enough
  15. He didn’t send me a thank you note
  16. She didn’t feel like a good fit
  17. He talked too much
  18. She seemed unsure of herself

The list goes on, but the point is not everything is within your control and not everyone doing interviews is rationally analyzing you. If it weren’t for luck, you’d win every time.


3. How to improve your chance of getting an offer.

Let’s get technicals right out of the way. I’m going to ignore the places that ask very difficult, numerical questions and focus on the household-name investment banks with standard questions. To perform in interviews with these types of banks:

Memorize all of the questions/answers in one of the large interview guides. Actually know them all, not most of them, but all of them. You want a job in IB? I’m telling you how to do it. There are no reliable shortcuts. Yes, this technique is an old bitch. She’s not much fun to ride, but she still gets you there.

If your guide is shorter than 60 pages, it probably isn’t long enough. The Wallstreet Oasis Technical Interview Guide is very good, but I’m sure there are other fantastic options. Once you memorize the contents, learn one layer beyond the simple answer and understand the ‘why’ and the underlying concepts. Along the way, PRACTICE stating the answers out loud. PRACTICE walking through how the three financial statements change given a certain transaction or change to an account - make up different scenarios and walk through things. Too many people practice with flash cards or just by reading or watching videos. Remember, watching a porno doesn’t mean you got laid - in fact it usually means the opposite. You can’t just read about the act or watch a video on the act. You need to act yourself.

You will need to explain concepts under pressure. Practice will keep you cool, composed, and cogent. I’m tired of interviewing people who don’t know what the FFR is, who can’t convincingly explain exactly WHY bond prices fall in a rising rate environment, or who forget taxes when discussing the impact of increasing depreciation on the financial statements. There simply is no excuse - control what you can control. If you read above, you saw how much is outside your control.

If you get really grilled on technicals, don’t get flustered. As Gandhi said, “don’t let the cunts wind you up.” Winners don’t complain when the other side plays the game.


Special section for zoom interviews: DO CHEAT. Write down key market metrics and levels (FF, 10YT, DJIA) and other things you tend to forget. Stick them on the wall behind your camera so your gaze does not have to travel far. DON’T rely too much on this technique as you will not be confident. It is easy to tell when someone googles what a convertible bond is mid interview.

Make sure the lighting is good for video calls, I don’t want to feel like I’m about to watch a low-budget porno.


Behavioral questions make or break the “qualified” candidates (the candidates who do well enough on the technicals to not be remembered). The candidates who CRUSH the technicals and are remembered for doing so have more leeway here, but why risk it? Some of the notes below pertain to general didactic conversation (including the technical portion of an interview), but are mostly focused on helping you ace the behavioral questions:

  1. Generally, HOW YOU SPEAK is more important than WHAT YOU SPEAK. Interviewers remember your overall public speaking skills more than the content of your answer. If you come off as affable, confident, and normal, it doesn’t really matter how compelling your story is. I still have no idea how to asses the “time you faced adversity in school or in an internship” answer, but I do know how to assess whether you are syntactically capable, whether your sentences flow and you present thoughts in a logical order, and whether you captive my attention or let it lie down on the couch and pass out.
  2. Create a list of the 40-50 most common behavioral questions - this can come from a resource like the Wall Street Oasis Behavioral Interview Guide, or from googling “common interview questions” (banks ask basically the same questions as your girlfriend in marketing will be asked at her next 8 hour per week vacation of a job).
  3. Consolidate the list of questions into 5-10 question “frameworks.” This will be the general ideas contained and rephrased in the 40-50 question list. You will end up with anecdotes on, a time you failed, a time you succeeded, a time you worked in a team, why you want to work at xyz bank, why you want to be in investment banking/finance, how you navigated conflict, TELL ME ABOUT YOURSELF/walk me through your resume, etc.
  4. NO MATTER HOW THEY PHRASE A BEHAVIORAL QUESTION, YOU WILL ANSWER WITH ONE OF YOUR PRE-CANNED “FRAMEWORKS.” No one remembers if you tell a story that is only generally related. They do remember your delivery.
  5. Consider each of your 5-10 frameworks and write answers in 4-6 bullets (NOT in script form). Your answers should not be too generic and should be based on reality as much as possible (easier to tell the story and be “authentic”). The bullets should be main ideas only. Make sure these would never offend anyone, don’t make you look like a suck up, and are believable. Please don’t make your “teamwork” answer be about that group project with the kid who didn’t do his work so you had to step in and save the day - I’ve heard that WAY too many times.
  6. PRACTICE each framework answer in the mirror or record yourself. Few people do this, but the ones who do, do very well. If you record yourself, you will realize how dumb you sound - nails on chalkboard dumb. Then you will improve until you can barely stand yourself. Once you are at the point where you shrug with casual indifference upon hearing your answer, you have succeeded. Each answer is at most a few minutes long, so you can practice all your answers, and each a few times, without occupying too much time. The point here is not to memorize a script, but to solidly understand your KEY POINTS within an anecdote and have POLISHED TRANSITIONS between your key points.
  7. If all this practice seems like too much, just remember this process is a marathon and you can’t win a marathon without putting some god damn band aids on your nipples.
  8. DO NOT ASK ME POINTLESS QUESTIONS AT THE END OF THE INTERVIEW. However, if you do ask “time filler” questions, you probably won’t be dinged as EVERYONE does this. Don’t waste time asking “what makes a good analyst” or “what is your day to day like.” You may not necessarily get dinged, but it certainly won’t help you.
  9. USE THE Q&A AT THE END OF THE INTERVIEW TO YOUR ADVANTAGE. This means asking intelligent questions that both demonstrate your knowledge and that you have done your homework. Ask about a deal the bank has done, ask about market conditions, ask about recent economic events. Try not to sound like a nerd, but show them you are well-informed and perceptive. Don’t ask overly complex questions - ask questions about topics on which a banker could be reasonable informed. Do know one level of information beyond your question (in case they flip it back to you and so you can remain part of the conversation/ask follow-ups).
  10. Don’t filibuster. If you move through the interview with the pace of a dead turtle, the interviewers won’t be able to get through all the questions. This may help you if you are bad technically, but will also prohibit you from standing out.
  11. Don’t start sentences that don’t go anywhere. Everyone does this at some point or another. They try to recover by using filler words such as “um, like, yeah, you know.” Generally, we, um, like, don’t know, which is why we are interviewing you. Telling you not to do something is only slightly helpful. More helpful is telling you how to avoid it. See point 4 on PRACTICE.
  12. If an interviewer cracks a joke or laughs, you should laugh too. NOT the knee-slapping ‘I’m-clearly-sucking-up’ laugh, but the gentle actor laugh where you smile with your eyes and let out a couple chuckles and gently shrug your shoulders (like you might with a more powerful laugh) so they can SEE that you are laughing without fully HEARING it.
  13. Maintain a very light smile on your face at all times - people just respond better to it. Especially if you have resting bitch face.
  14. There is no need to say “that is a good question” every time we ask you a question. Trust me, it isn’t a good question. It is only ok to say “that is a good question” if someone asks you something technical about a class/project/internship that is on your resume or comes up in discussion. This will give them the feeling of being impressed and the feeling of enjoyment. They are not impressed with you, they are impressed with themselves for asking a “good question.”

Other musings:

The MD who monopolizes the interview to chat about your hobbies, ask you two softball technicals, and then bore you with details of his last vacation is NOT helping you. You will leave thinking you and he CONNECTED with each other. Little do you know, he will NOT ATTEND the force-rank discussion afterwards (he doesn’t feel like it) and his interview partner will not have enough information to score you highly in the force rank (good news is you probably won’t be shafted either since there was no time for you to make a mistake).

All of the candidates at our target-school super day came from schools like UPenn, Duke, UC Berkley, Dartmouth, have 3.7+ GPAs (4.0 was definitely the mode), speak quite well, and have one or two (or four) finance related internships. I have no idea how they get so many internships so early, but they do. This is a tough crowd in which to stand out - and yet, every single time, interviewers are nearly unanimous about the top two or three candidates in a group of 10-15. The best always stand out (and they aren’t always the ones with the highest GPA and most internships).

If you are really lost on a technical question, sometimes it is better to admit it and let them think you are an idiot, than to take a stab at it and prove them right.

In my experience, once you are being interviewed, your GPA/internships don’t matter much. I don’t recall any conversations where someone pointed out a GPA or internship as a reason for someone to be ranked higher or not be designated “no-offer.” I suspect this is simply because most interviewers don’t even have the resumes in front of them when doing the post-superday force-rank discussion (though some do take their notes on each printed resume).

Wear a suit and tie - why risk it? Nobody ever got dinged for wearing a suit and tie to an investment banking interview at a large firm.

Get a haircut too, bed-head suave is never going to score any points. I don’t like people whose hair looks wet and dry at the same time.

If you are a girl, don’t dress like Rachel Maddow’s mechanic. Don’t wear anything that is “sexual” either. Wear something plain and professional that a background character would wear on a show like Suits.

Send a thank you note because some interviewers only remember the people who didn’t send one. There is no need to say “I hope to hear from you soon.” We don’t control when you hear from us. We don’t even know who “us” is, but “they” will call you if you get an offer.

Don’t tell any jokes that are so funny HR wants to hear them.



Ad Astra Per Aspera

 

Don't tell any jokes that are so funny HR wants to hear them.

Bro clearly hasn't heard my joke about when a Pollock, Arab, and Vietnamese guy walk into a bar.

But fr tho this must've taken forever to write + SB

 

maestro_

Over the past two years I've interviewed over 30 candidates, both during formal super days and for candidates on an accelerated process due to exploding offers. I want to share some inside advice on how I and my fellow interview partners perceive interviewees (and common mistakes), how an established investment bank makes offer/no-offer decisions, and how you can improve your chances of getting an offer. Please take all my shitty tips to your next interview and unite them in a symphony of success and glory. Keep in mind, you don't need to be number one. A close third will do nicely.

1. How are offer/no-offer decisions made?

This varies from bank to bank. For super days, a random subset of the candidate pool will be interviewed by an interview "team." This is a group of interviewers or interviewer pairs conducting separate interviews with separate questions, but all interview the same subset of the candidate pool. At the end of the day, they discuss as a group, decide if anyone simply doesn't cut it (feedback will be "no offer"), and then FORCE RANK the candidates who meet the minimum.

These discussions are full of all types of personalities: the people who don't really care who is hired, the people who feel an affinity for a certain candidate, the people who only care about how well a candidate did on technicals, the people who "didn't like the interviewee's body language." Being successful is about both appealing to the masses and ensuring you don't heavily irk any single interviewee (like fraternity rush, a blackball is hard to come back from). If someone is vocal about their dislike for you, unless others LOVED you, most will just go with the flow and let that disagreeable person drag you down the rankings (or into the "no offer") category. Remember, interviewers are not always that invested in getting the best candidates, they want to get finished with things and get back to work. 

HR receives these force ranked lists from each interview team and then grabs the top half or whatever threshold they are looking for and sends out offers. There is often a separate HR management system where each interviewer submits a formal review with numerical scores and commentary for each interview he or she conducted. I am not certain what this is used for, but it may come into play for the second round of offers (after people re-neg).

Notice how there is no point where I mentioned heavy reliance on statistics, note-keeping on the part of the interviewers, adjusting interviewer rankings against a control/normalizing rankings, etc. This is not an accurate process. Most interviewers write down a sentence or two and maybe a single numerical score. Don't think that we are keeping track of some sort of grading system for each question we ask you - we aren't. It is the sum total of your performance that matters and it will be distilled down to a sentence or two which will be reviewed by the interviewer in the force-rank discussion so they can recall their opinion of you.

2. How do interviewers perceive candidates?

Everything is sex. Someone told me that and I haven't been able to figure out if it is right or wrong, but at least it got your attention. Interviewers perceive candidates through a number of emotions which can help you: trust, respect, enjoyment, being impressed, sympathy, occasionally empathy. They also can view you through less helpful emotions: boredom, disappointment, ennui, anger, self-righteousness, feeling threatened. The point is that people are not fully rational and interpret your candidacy through their own feelings and experiences. There is not much you can do here - it is unlikely you will be able to fully read both your interviewers and cater to their wants, needs, and desires. More on how to prepare for interviews later, but your goal is to cater to the majority, while not offending anyone's sensitivities or nudging against their pet peeves.

To assist you in this battle, below is a list of complaints I have heard in post interview discussions. Most of these just show how ridiculous interviewers can be.

  1. He looked up too much while he was thinking
  2. Her answers to behavioral questions were all about school/clubs and not about internships
  3. He smiled so much it looked fake
  4. She was too quiet
  5. He fidgeted
  6. She gesticulated too much while talking
  7. He spoke too loudly
  8. She seemed too confident
  9. He tried too hard on the technicals
  10. She memorized the answers to the technicals
  11. He wasn't very engaging
  12. Her hobbies didn't seem authentic
  13. He said what he thought we wanted to hear rather than what he felt
  14. She wasn't confident enough
  15. He didn't send me a thank you note
  16. She didn't feel like a good fit
  17. He talked too much
  18. She seemed unsure of herself

The list goes on, but the point is not everything is within your control and not everyone doing interviews is rationally analyzing you. If it weren't for luck, you'd win every time.

3. How to improve your chance of getting an offer.

Let's get technicals right out of the way. I'm going to ignore the places that ask very difficult, numerical questions and focus on the household-name investment banks with standard questions. To perform in interviews with these types of banks:

Memorize all of the questions/answers in one of the large interview guides. Actually know them all, not most of them, but all of them. You want a job in IB? I'm telling you how to do it. There are no reliable shortcuts. Yes, this technique is an old bitch. She's not much fun to ride, but she still gets you there.

If your guide is shorter than 60 pages, it probably isn't long enough. The Wallstreet Oasis Technical Interview Guide is very good, but I'm sure there are other fantastic options. Once you memorize the contents, learn one layer beyond the simple answer and understand the 'why' and the underlying concepts. Along the way, PRACTICE stating the answers out loud. PRACTICE walking through how the three financial statements change given a certain transaction or change to an account - make up different scenarios and walk through things. Too many people practice with flash cards or just by reading or watching videos. Remember, watching a porno doesn't mean you got laid - in fact it usually means the opposite. You can't just read about the act or watch a video on the act. You need to act yourself.

You will need to explain concepts under pressure. Practice will keep you cool, composed, and cogent. I'm tired of interviewing people who don't know what the FFR is, who can't convincingly explain exactly WHY bond prices fall in a rising rate environment, or who forget taxes when discussing the impact of increasing depreciation on the financial statements. There simply is no excuse - control what you can control. If you read above, you saw how much is outside your control.

If you get really grilled on technicals, don't get flustered. As Gandhi said, "don't let the cunts wind you up." Winners don't complain when the other side plays the game.

Special section for zoom interviews: DO CHEAT. Write down key market metrics and levels (FF, 10YT, DJIA) and other things you tend to forget. Stick them on the wall behind your camera so your gaze does not have to travel far. DON'T rely too much on this technique as you will not be confident. It is easy to tell when someone googles what a convertible bond is mid interview.

Make sure the lighting is good for video calls, I don't want to feel like I'm about to watch a low-budget porno.

Behavioral questions make or break the "qualified" candidates (the candidates who do well enough on the technicals to not be remembered). The candidates who CRUSH the technicals and are remembered for doing so have more leeway here, but why risk it? Some of the notes below pertain to general didactic conversation (including the technical portion of an interview), but are mostly focused on helping you ace the behavioral questions:

  1. Generally, HOW YOU SPEAK is more important than WHAT YOU SPEAK. Interviewers remember your overall public speaking skills more than the content of your answer. If you come off as affable, confident, and normal, it doesn't really matter how compelling your story is. I still have no idea how to asses the "time you faced adversity in school or in an internship" answer, but I do know how to assess whether you are syntactically capable, whether your sentences flow and you present thoughts in a logical order, and whether you captive my attention or let it lie down on the couch and pass out.
  2. Create a list of the 40-50 most common behavioral questions - this can come from a resource like the Wall Street Oasis Behavioral Interview Guide, or from googling "common interview questions" (banks ask basically the same questions as your girlfriend in marketing will be asked at her next 8 hour per week vacation of a job).
  3. Consolidate the list of questions into 5-10 question "frameworks." This will be the general ideas contained and rephrased in the 40-50 question list. You will end up with anecdotes on, a time you failed, a time you succeeded, a time you worked in a team, why you want to work at xyz bank, why you want to be in investment banking/finance, how you navigated conflict, TELL ME ABOUT YOURSELF/walk me through your resume, etc.
  4. NO MATTER HOW THEY PHRASE A BEHAVIORAL QUESTION, YOU WILL ANSWER WITH ONE OF YOUR PRE-CANNED "FRAMEWORKS." No one remembers if you tell a story that is only generally related. They do remember your delivery.
  5. Consider each of your 5-10 frameworks and write answers in 4-6 bullets (NOT in script form). Your answers should not be too generic and should be based on reality as much as possible (easier to tell the story and be "authentic"). The bullets should be main ideas only. Make sure these would never offend anyone, don't make you look like a suck up, and are believable. Please don't make your "teamwork" answer be about that group project with the kid who didn't do his work so you had to step in and save the day - I've heard that WAY too many times.
  6. PRACTICE each framework answer in the mirror or record yourself. Few people do this, but the ones who do, do very well. If you record yourself, you will realize how dumb you sound - nails on chalkboard dumb. Then you will improve until you can barely stand yourself. Once you are at the point where you shrug with casual indifference upon hearing your answer, you have succeeded. Each answer is at most a few minutes long, so you can practice all your answers, and each a few times, without occupying too much time. The point here is not to memorize a script, but to solidly understand your KEY POINTS within an anecdote and have POLISHED TRANSITIONS between your key points.
  7. If all this practice seems like too much, just remember this process is a marathon and you can't win a marathon without putting some god damn band aids on your nipples.
  8. DO NOT ASK ME POINTLESS QUESTIONS AT THE END OF THE INTERVIEW. However, if you do ask "time filler" questions, you probably won't be dinged as EVERYONE does this. Don't waste time asking "what makes a good analyst" or "what is your day to day like." You may not necessarily get dinged, but it certainly won't help you.
  9. USE THE Q&A AT THE END OF THE INTERVIEW TO YOUR ADVANTAGE. This means asking intelligent questions that both demonstrate your knowledge and that you have done your homework. Ask about a deal the bank has done, ask about market conditions, ask about recent economic events. Try not to sound like a nerd, but show them you are well-informed and perceptive. Don't ask overly complex questions - ask questions about topics on which a banker could be reasonable informed. Do know one level of information beyond your question (in case they flip it back to you and so you can remain part of the conversation/ask follow-ups).
  10. Don't filibuster. If you move through the interview with the pace of a dead turtle, the interviewers won't be able to get through all the questions. This may help you if you are bad technically, but will also prohibit you from standing out.
  11. Don't start sentences that don't go anywhere. Everyone does this at some point or another. They try to recover by using filler words such as "um, like, yeah, you know." Generally, we, um, like, don't know, which is why we are interviewing you. Telling you not to do something is only slightly helpful. More helpful is telling you how to avoid it. See point 4 on PRACTICE.
  12. If an interviewer cracks a joke or laughs, you should laugh too. NOT the knee-slapping 'I'm-clearly-sucking-up' laugh, but the gentle actor laugh where you smile with your eyes and let out a couple chuckles and gently shrug your shoulders (like you might with a more powerful laugh) so they can SEE that you are laughing without fully HEARING it.
  13. Maintain a very light smile on your face at all times - people just respond better to it. Especially if you have resting bitch face.
  14. There is no need to say "that is a good question" every time we ask you a question. Trust me, it isn't a good question. It is only ok to say "that is a good question" if someone asks you something technical about a class/project/internship that is on your resume or comes up in discussion. This will give them the feeling of being impressed and the feeling of enjoyment. They are not impressed with you, they are impressed with themselves for asking a "good question."

Other musings:

The MD who monopolizes the interview to chat about your hobbies, ask you two softball technicals, and then bore you with details of his last vacation is NOT helping you. You will leave thinking you and he CONNECTED with each other. Little do you know, he will NOT ATTEND the force-rank discussion afterwards (he doesn't feel like it) and his interview partner will not have enough information to score you highly in the force rank (good news is you probably won't be shafted either since there was no time for you to make a mistake).

All of the candidates at our target-school super day came from schools like UPenn, Duke, UC Berkley, Dartmouth, have 3.7+ GPAs (4.0 was definitely the mode), speak quite well, and have one or two (or four) finance related internships. I have no idea how they get so many internships so early, but they do. This is a tough crowd in which to stand out - and yet, every single time, interviewers are nearly unanimous about the top two or three candidates in a group of 10-15. The best always stand out (and they aren't always the ones with the highest GPA and most internships).

If you are really lost on a technical question, sometimes it is better to admit it and let them think you are an idiot, than to take a stab at it and prove them right.

In my experience, once you are being interviewed, your GPA/internships don't matter much. I don't recall any conversations where someone pointed out a GPA or internship as a reason for someone to be ranked higher or not be designated "no-offer." I suspect this is simply because most interviewers don't even have the resumes in front of them when doing the post-superday force-rank discussion (though some do take their notes on each printed resume).

Wear a suit and tie - why risk it? Nobody ever got dinged for wearing a suit and tie to an investment banking interview at a large firm.

Get a haircut too, bed-head suave is never going to score any points. I don't like people whose hair looks wet and dry at the same time.

If you are a girl, don't dress like Rachel Maddow's mechanic. Don't wear anything that is "sexual" either. Wear something plain and professional that a background character would wear on a show like Suits.

Send a thank you note because some interviewers only remember the people who didn't send one. There is no need to say "I hope to hear from you soon." We don't control when you hear from us. We don't even know who "us" is, but "they" will call you if you get an offer.

Don't tell any jokes that are so funny HR wants to hear them.

Ad Astra Per Aspera

Thanks so much OP, do these tips also apply for lateral/experienced hires?

 
Funniest

Jesus Christ man you don't have to requote the entire post in your reply. I was literally scrolling for an entire minute just to get to the other comments

 

Everything is sex. 

this technique is an old bitch. She's not much fun to ride, but she still gets you there.

As Gandhi said, "don't let the cunts wind you up." Winners don't complain when the other side plays the game.

Make sure the lighting is good for video calls, I don't want to feel like I'm about to watch a low-budget porno.

If all this practice seems like too much, just remember this process is a marathon and you can't win a marathon without putting some god damn band aids on your nipples.

Great metaphors - HR definitely wants to hear these

 
Most Helpful

Great advice. A few tips for supers I can think of:

1. Bring printed copies of your resume (can be in a professional looking notebook or in a slim computer case)

2. The way you prep is based on the expectation that you will get asked a question, answer it in 1-2mins, then they will ask u another question. Especially for behaviourals, it’s often more chaotic than that. Your interviewer might point out an internship on your resume and ask you to talk about it. Then while you’re explaining it, they might interrupt you to ask a specific question about something you just said. My point is, chances are you will have to go off script, so don’t panic and try your best to be conversational when this happens.

3. Toward the end of the superday, you will start getting tired. It’s important to be conscious of this because naturally you might stop smiling and might start leaning back in your chair more. Try to realize this and take corrective measures.

 

How often do technical questions from the advanced section of the 400 Q guide come up? I have all the basic sections down but haven't spent too much time on the advanced sections

 

I just finished up recruiting for SA2024 and I had ~4 supers and only one of them was vaguely technical.

The way I went about learning technicals was significantly different from how 1) I thought I was going to go about it, and 2) how other sophomores at my school went about it. I had done a lot of modeling last semester for a club we have on campus, so I had a decent understanding of how things flowed together, how you got from x to y to z, and how certain valuation methodologies worked. I then just did my best to understand all of the basic 400Q guide questions, which wasn’t all that helpful for me. The most important thing for technicals for me at this point was the specific BIWS technical guides (LBO Guide, M&A Guide, DCF/Valuation Guides we’re all super helpful).

After learning all of this, I did my best to practice actually answering the questions either by myself in my room, or by doing mock interviews with other sophomores or upperclassmen who had interviewed at these places earlier.

The level of technicals that you will be asked in a typical BB interview is very basic. For example, the majority of my technical questions were things like, tell me about the 3-4 main valuation methodologies, 10$ depreciation thru the three statements, what is WACC, debt or equity, which is cheaper and why.

If you understand the fundamentals of each concept, you will be completely fine for all banks other than EBs like Evercore, Moelis, PWP, Lazard, and Centerview.

Good luck!

 

Great tips OP. Something I've done myself and noticed on the other side is the visible fatigue candidates have as the day goes on.

Whilst we all know repeating your 'story' or a certain competency you've said 3x today feels repetitive, it's very important to show each interviewer the same energy level since they'll be judging you on what they see/hear.

 
maestro_

2. How do interviewers perceive candidates?

Everything is sex.

Pizz

"If you always put limits on everything you do, physical or anything else, it will spread into your work and into your life. There are no limits. There are only plateaus, and you must not stay there, you must go beyond them." - Bruce Lee
 

Adipisci eaque necessitatibus repellendus unde atque ad omnis voluptatem. Non eligendi voluptatem quisquam quia soluta a. Est ut quia quisquam itaque. Excepturi ipsa quis dolore. Dolor consequuntur laboriosam nemo quia.

 

Veniam ut sed ipsam sit enim voluptas tenetur. Officiis reprehenderit dolores earum qui soluta. Odio recusandae est asperiores qui ex blanditiis et ea.

Nisi consequatur dolorum nulla ut at quia ullam. Cum ut laudantium numquam. Incidunt labore porro ad similique voluptates officiis ipsa.

Voluptas quam velit exercitationem ratione qui est. Ullam officia enim et totam non. Perferendis impedit architecto doloribus cupiditate id. Sit architecto dolores facere ex assumenda omnis esse. Sit eum nemo voluptatem.

Ut explicabo dolorem vel at consequatur. Vel eveniet non vero inventore. Illo at laborum qui repellat omnis harum et. Qui beatae sit enim aut est.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”