Is Leverage Recapitalization (two ways: taking on debt and buying back shares or taking on debt and giving out as dividend) Accretive or dilutive?
| +134 | Restructuring: Anti-climactic Experience | 36 | 4h |
| +109 | IB Net Worth / Savings Check | 51 | 4h |
| +99 | Woman who emptied Knicks trashcan on street then stole it was DEI exec, worked at JPMorgan Chase | 25 | 1h |
| +82 | Stop sleeping on UBS - it’s pretty good | 29 | 41m |
| +56 | 2026 VAULT PRESTIGE RANKINGS | 30 | 1h |
| +55 | Hot take: I’d rather be at Desjardins than UBS for investment banking in 2026 | 10 | 3m |
| +39 | AI + Financial Modelling | 12 | 1d |
| +32 | Hardest interview experiences? | 17 | 21m |
| +28 | Summer before college | 17 | 19h |
| +26 | Current State of UBS in North America | 8 | 2d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Maybe someone else can chime in, but I would take a look at the cost vs the yield of the shares.
Cost of financing = after-tax kD Yield of Shares (assuming it is a private company) = Assign a valuation on a per share basis (say, estimate Equity value and divide by # of insider shares).
If after-tax kD > than the EPS / Estimated Price per share, then it is dilutive. Other way = Accretive.
For dividend purposes, it would be dilutive. EPS are lower due to the fact that you have additional interest expense, while # of shares stay constant. Dilutive on the I/S doesn't mean it's not beneficial for the stockholders, though, as they are getting their cash earlier and such act is probably pushing their IRR up.
For taking on new debt to buy back shares, this is what I said during my interview: because additional debt leads to interest expense, which decreases NI; on the other hand, the number of shares also decreases. In this way, both the numerator (NI) and denominator (# of shares) decrease in EPS equation, and really depends on which one has more effect than the other. Is my logic correct?
But then my interviewer asked me that if I had to choose one between Accretive and dilutive, what would buying back shares usually be and I just guessed Accretive and totally bs my reasoning. Interested in knowing the right answer.
Lev recap are typically used to increase EPS
I believe Accretive because leveraged recaps force higher operating performance and efficiency to meet debt service payments, in theory. Naturally, a decrease in the number of shares would only add to this if shares are being bought back with debt raised.
https://www.jpmorgan.com/jpmpdf/1320670225793.pdf
where can i get all of those >_ ?
Alias repellat debitis repellendus dolorum iusto sequi sunt. Accusantium eos inventore nihil modi ut illo delectus.
Esse modi aut illum aspernatur dolor ipsum autem. Corporis inventore nihil sit vel consequatur magni. Cupiditate dolor nesciunt nobis asperiores qui rerum quod. Eaque amet consequuntur omnis et.
Placeat error omnis hic voluptatem. Voluptas quia autem explicabo delectus ab. Voluptates assumenda aspernatur deserunt et. Dignissimos cumque est enim eum. Voluptatibus quia quidem quasi a aut nemo. Nulla ipsum est necessitatibus voluptas quis sit dolor.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...