IBD technicals advice

If I give you two companies with the same revenues, but one has an EBITDA margin of 25% and the other has an EBITDA margin of 40%, and they are trading at the same EBITDA multiple, which company would you purchase and why?

How does a better brand impact the financial statements?

What ratio can you use to compare companies without earnings?

 
Best Response

Taking a stab here,

  1. It depends on whether you can realistically strip out some of the COGS and SG&A expense from the first company, if so you could realize a gain upon exiting from your investment at the same EBITDA multiple. If not, go for the second company as it appears to be in a stronger cash flow position based on using EBITDA as a proxy for cash flow before the effects of the company's capital structure.

  2. It depends on the accounting standards you are applying. Typically you having a strong brand will have no effect because internally generated brands such as your own brands cannot be recognized as intangible assets under IAS 38.

  3. Compare in what way?

 

My version:

  1. If we are talking about some two random companies and absolutely no additional information, then the right way is to choose the one with higher EBITDA which usually means stronger cash flows.

If they are in the same industry, see industry average EBITDA margins to identify which one has more potential for operatinal improvements (basically, if average margin is above 25%, buy first company, if below - don't buy any of two)

If they are in two different industries, see industry average multiples to identify which one is (more) undervalued

  1. From accounting perspective, see post above. From economic perspective, strong brand usually allows to achieve better margins due to higher pricing power, so the answer can be - higher margins with stronger brand

  2. If you mean comparing valuation, you can always try non-earnings-based ratio like price to book value, price to CF, price to revenues or, less likely, use precedent transaction apprach.

 

Adipisci et labore earum occaecati non autem maxime. Quidem porro voluptas vero nemo quia consectetur. Quis expedita est consequatur eum enim.

Odit exercitationem quae vitae commodi nihil. Placeat et rem molestias sed odit quia. Facilis accusantium exercitationem repellendus incidunt laboriosam tenetur. Molestiae odit laudantium voluptatum voluptas quis consequuntur autem.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Perella Weinberg Partners New 98.9%
  • Lazard Freres 01 98.3%
  • Harris Williams & Co. 24 97.7%
  • Goldman Sachs 16 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.9%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 97.7%
  • Perella Weinberg Partners New 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.9%
  • Perella Weinberg Partners 18 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 16 97.7%
  • Moelis & Company 06 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (21) $373
  • Associates (91) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (68) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (206) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (148) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”