JPM vs HSBC?

Based on the most helpful WSO content, JPM is generally regarded as a stronger platform for long-term career growth, especially if you're focused on staying in the U.S. HSBC's strategy of doubling down on Hong Kong and scaling back in the U.S. could limit your future opportunities domestically. JPM, on the other hand, offers a robust network, brand recognition, and a wide range of exit options across industries and geographies.

If the HSBC role is significantly better in terms of responsibilities and immediate career growth, it might be worth considering. However, if you're confident in your ability to lateral within JPM to a similar role at HSBC, sticking with JPM could provide better long-term stability and opportunities in the U.S. Additionally, JPM's culture and training programs are often highlighted as strong advantages for career development.

Sources: https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/investment-banking/jpm-ma-vs-top-eb-cvpevrpjt?customgpt=1, JP Morgan IB RIsk Exposed Part 2, JPM London: Horror Stories on Junior Staff Cuts, HF vs Career Banker @ CVP/PJT?, How do you get offers and not know which one to take?