LIFO (w/LIFO Reserve) vs. FIFO

This question may be blatantly obvious and simple to some people. However, I'm curious to know what the difference between LIFO (w/ LIFO reserve essentially standardizing it to FIFO) and FIFO would be?

Given the use of LIFO reserves, why would firms still choose to use LIFO? It seems to me like they would be the same...

Any comments would be appreciated..thanks in advance!

8 Comments
 

I'm assuming you're asking why firms would still choose to use FIFO? There are no GAAP restrictions on the use of FIFO to report inventory. IFRS, however, prohibits the use of LIFO. Because of this, U.S.-based companies that use LIFO have to report a footnote that essentially "converts" the statements to FIFO thanks to the LIFO reserve.

The case for using LIFO is that it would require a corporation to pay less taxes. Because of inflation, one can assume that inventory prices are constantly rising in the long-term. LIFO would lead to a higher COGS figure, lower net income, and, effectively, lower taxes. You can see why this would raise a ton of regulatory concern.

 

Right, I get what you're saying. But my question is: why would firms even use LIFO in the first place when you have to essentially "convert" it back to FIFO? Why not just use FIFO to begin with?

Also, when you adjust for LIFO reserve, you also have to make appropriate changes in COGS and taxes, which makes the use of LIFO pointless isn't it?

 
Best Response

I think you are confused. Firms usually use LIFO for reporting/tax purposes only (their fundamental business process is usually FIFO). They use LIFO because as described above, it will reduce taxes.

Here is how LIFO reserve is used. First, firms don't use LIFO reserve to convert LIFO inventory amount to FIFO amount. Rather, the firm's accounting system will report FIFO balance (asset so debit account) and LIFO reserve (contra asset so credit account), and the net of the two will be reported on the financial statements and tax reports as LIFO.

Same thing happens with COGS. Firms internal accounting will report COGS on a FIFO basis and then will add to the COGS the change in LIFO reserve to get to the LIFO COGS, which will be reported on the financial statements/tax reports.

So to answer your questions, yes, companies actually use FIFO for internal purposes (because it reflects the business process). But by using LIFO and adding to the COGS (for reporting and tax purposes), you end up inflating costs and thus reducing taxes. The LIFO reserve accounts and the adjustments to FIFO COGS is just basically a hassle to get that extra tax deduction and a regulatory requirement such that investors, if they want, convert back to FIFO to align financial information with the underlying business process.

 

Thank you so much for the response.

I get all that. I'm still confused as to why there would be a benefit though? Because on paper, the "LIFO" is basically FIFO with the LIFO Reserve and its associated affects (i.e. COGS and tax adjustments etc.) The only tax benefit I can think of is deferred tax assets (taxes payable > tax expense). Then it wouldn't be a true tax benefit. Is this what you were referring too?

 

Quasi nostrum voluptatem doloremque aliquid aut sapiente quo. Vitae et est ut.

Maiores aut nam provident quidem accusamus non. Deserunt et labore dolores accusantium at. Praesentium dolor qui temporibus non rerum odit corporis. Ut recusandae a iusto alias libero vero.

Molestiae nihil explicabo corrupti quasi. Sed ducimus quia fuga eius ipsa delectus iste. Dignissimos libero soluta eaque ut nulla temporibus. Deleniti cumque similique est.

Aut asperiores minus numquam voluptatum omnis rerum. Accusamus tempora distinctio sequi id sunt et.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (67) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”