Major GPA vs Cumulative GPA Question

Why is it that people think its a good idea to put their major gpa on their resume when the majority of the time it is higher than the cumulative. If you major in finance or economics and your major gpa is 3.8, but your cumulative gpa is 3.65, doesn't it make you look even worse because it probably means you didn't do as well in classes that don't relate to your major. It's like saying hey, in my hard classes i do well, but when i take my general education classes like history or geology, I don't do so hot. And if you are taking harder classes than what your major requires, then that also proves my point. Can anyone explain so I can understand?

13 Comments
 
Best Response

>it probably means you didn't do as well in classes that don't relate to your major.

Why would a company ever neg you for that? I mean, IB is far from a "general case" but in general, companies want to see that you're proficient in the material that is actually relevant to the work that they do. Showing a greater proficiency in major specific classes shows that you understand the important material that they actually need you to understand. This also makes sense, as most people probably put more effort into their major specific classes (otherwise why would they even be in that major?)

>hey, in my hard classes i do well, but when i take my general education classes like history or geology, I don't do so hot.

Major classes only include program specific classes. For example, I am in Petroleum Engineering so any non-Petroleum Engineering classes are non major classes. Statics (C- class average), Thermodynamics, all the Chemistry courses I needed to take (my worst subject), my absurdly difficult Differential Equations class, along with others are all outside of my major. Now I've done relatively alright so far and I don't personally list a major GPA, but non-major classes are not necessarily "easy." They're only easy if you take a major with an easy flowchart and take easy electives, and I don't know why you think that would look better to employers.

>And if you are taking harder classes than what your major requires, then that also proves my point.

See the last point

 

For most people on this site who do that it's because they take other "harder" courses (I put the quotes around harder because it depends on the person). For me it's the same. Much of my first 2 semesters were composed of engineering lower divs which really brought my GPA down. Now why would it make sense for a bank to ding me on my knowledge of C++ when they should instead evaluate my proficiency in financial accounting or econ. It doesn't so instead I list my major GPA and my overall GPA.

Most people who want to major in STEM while also majoring in finance or business don't want their STEM GPA to be their downfall so listing the major GPA really makes it easier to tell the difference.

In my case 3.6 overall and 4.0 major...pretty significant difference.

 

Hey Levered 6x, I think you deserve a response...heck, everyone does. We're listening, sorry about the delay ...my best guess at places on WSO that could help:

More suggestions...

Hope that helps.

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

No harm in it really is there?

-------------------------------------------------------- "I do not think there is any other quality so essential to success of any kind as the quality of perseverance. It overcom
 

I would put it as "Business GPA."

"Greed, in all of its forms; greed for life, for money, for love, for knowledge has marked the upward surge of mankind. And greed, you mark my words, will not only save Teldar Paper, but that other malfunctioning corporation called the USA."
 

Eveniet recusandae rerum quisquam vero. Consequatur quis minima est et quaerat repellat. Eos dicta praesentium labore.

Est ducimus quibusdam distinctio voluptatum dolore ullam. Iste autem deserunt eum consequatur corrupti consectetur. Laboriosam tenetur in nostrum nostrum dolorum. Dolorem non hic et quae.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (67) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”