Can someone help me out? How can the expected return from the commercial real estate be "0". At the very least the property must be worth something so they can sell it right? Why did they for example give an entire portfolio of properties to Barclays / RBS for 1 euro?
Original Article: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303…
| +259 | Why UBS Is the Worst Place to Start Your IB Career | 40 | 1d |
| +215 | UBS 2nd Year Analyst Q&A (2026) | 41 | 38m |
| +92 | What's your craziest "hardo" story? | 16 | 9h |
| +62 | Indiana University Fraternity Pipelines | 36 | 2d |
| +52 | Rogo AI | 22 | 3h |
| +49 | Elite Boutique interview questions | 17 | 1d |
| +48 | Suspended for a Year | 19 | 2d |
| +45 | Wolf of Wall Street vs. Reality: Anyone else feel scammed by the movies? | 18 | 2h |
| +30 | Rate my non-target resume | 15 | 4h |
| +24 | RX Firm Lateral Advice | 15 | 7h |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
First, their fund was $8.8b so it's not a total loss on their capital. Second, do you understand the concept of capital structure at all? If I'm sitting in the equity or mezz, a 20% decrease in value could make my position completely worthless.
As for why they would just hand it over for an euro, I would imagine because they don't see any scenario in which paying future upkeep costs/renovation/etc. would make it profitable and it's simpler and easier to just get rid of the position.
Holding onto real estate without paying tenants is pretty costly. Taxes and maintenance must still be paid. If you look at value as whatever the market is willing to pay I suppose you could value properties at zero. With such a saturation, reduction in credit and the current economy having large office space unused is a huge liability.
One side note, sort of alluded to above, is the specific nature of commercial RE. A lot of places are funded with the assumption that they will re apply for a loan to take out the previous construction loan at a certain point. I don't know enough to really go deep into it, but RE financing is specific with a bunch of nuances.
i'd assume they took out debt against the properties and now the assets liabilities -> negative equity
that's probably what happened. i had to underwrite a couple of investments that were debt financed by msref, both SIGNIFICANTLY upside down. so i am assuming that that is the situation that most of their investments are in.
msref is in UNUSUALLY bad shape, relative to every other cre player. if losing money was an olympic sport, then msref would get a gold medal. their bonuses should be clawed back.
Got it. I was going through their specific projects, Pegasus which was a $540m investment and Fujisawa which was around the same both have projected returns of 0 which raised an eyebrow... rough times
x
HAH! You beat me to it. I was putting something together about this for tomorrow. Big, big hit. It's looking like the other shoe in commercial real estate is getting ready to fall.
why is morgan up over 2% despite this news..
Maybe because everyone already knew their RE holdings were shit, probably.
Because they are not losing $5.4Bn...they are losing 20% (? I think the article said 20%) or whatever MS's firm committed amount is. And they are telling their investors this now (their fund investors, or LPs, not stockholders), which means they took the write-down already. Duh.
on a side note, this may be a harbinger for financial armageddon. losses like this could translate to the commercial banking sector (which btw still refuses to realize tangible losses in cre), then that could feasibly trigger another major financial shit storm. i posted something about this a while back.
correct me if im wrong.
exactly. pretend and extend! kick the can down the road! we'll see how CMBS defaults go over the course of the year
response to my own post:
http://www.zerohedge.com/article/richard-koo-says-if-banks-marked-comme…
MS exited their position in china real estate market, lost a ton in last couple yrs. how hard is that? losing money in the bubble time.
I don't know, whenever I hear about massive write downs I always think about the next year when they will have a huge gain from these overly pessimistic assumptions.
Msref VII Global!!!!
i saw a marketing memo of a manager trying to raise money for a distress/opportunity fund last year, it was funny because they were using previous LPs as track record to raise the next LP. For one of the previous, the initial projected IRR was18%- 20%, but the actual current IRR was ~0%, with ~3 more years of lock up, and a few of the projects wont ever see profit. But somehow they still raised money for the next LP.
Similar to MSREF, Goldman's Whitehall isn't doing so great either, but I think the losses on these funds have mostly been accounted for; it's pretty clear cut when all the investments are worth 0. The problem is with the commercial lenders that have portfolios of loans that will never be repaid, but still not written down from the balance sheet, and they wont as long as they are not forced to mark to market.
LP's trying to recoup losses by investing in distressed cre. sounds counter-intuitive, but it is what it is.
personally i dont have any faith in cre appreciation for the near-term. demand was driven by the debt mkts, and that shit storm still hasnt passed.
The worst thing is that the fund is still having capital calls. Think about all the investors who have to continue putting good money toward bad shit. I am under the impression that a bunch of MS MD's have invested in MSREF vehicles and are therefore hurting.
Ex dolorem voluptatem ut eligendi possimus cupiditate quas sed. Neque iusto quisquam quibusdam est voluptatem quia molestiae. Magni laborum est unde non ex ut in cupiditate. Quam dignissimos repellendus dolorem. Voluptas dolorem quaerat voluptatem. Dolor enim temporibus quia dolore. Rerum distinctio reprehenderit et voluptatem quia assumenda expedita nulla.
Eveniet at asperiores quos fuga. Quis ratione et qui quia. Vitae et non est velit fugit delectus. Incidunt nihil inventore accusamus perspiciatis rerum.
Velit id inventore aliquid laboriosam nostrum hic inventore vitae. Reprehenderit itaque ut suscipit eligendi nostrum. Aut corrupti soluta quaerat iure.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Eum eveniet delectus placeat maxime consequatur aperiam. Perferendis optio tempore facilis non aliquid sed ut. Repudiandae est quis vero illum ut in quasi minima. Natus sunt saepe voluptatem occaecati. Et ut aut rerum recusandae explicabo molestias cum earum. Esse molestias sed alias consequatur praesentium sequi nihil. Mollitia facere ut aut error autem.
Aut qui quaerat error. Voluptas nisi beatae maxime corrupti hic quia consequatur ut. Laboriosam occaecati sint facilis id ducimus. Consectetur alias nisi dignissimos similique soluta. Ex mollitia error qui fugit. Quia autem et aut aut. Autem excepturi nihil quisquam et ipsam sed quaerat.
Numquam omnis illum aut earum ea voluptatem. Ad voluptatem repellendus odit consequuntur. Hic repellendus qui dolor sed recusandae. Sit ipsam ut voluptates incidunt. Eos maiores natus at sunt perspiciatis aut qui.
Quia saepe repudiandae voluptas tenetur minus quia. Et cumque unde aut ut debitis aliquid. A voluptas enim corrupti deserunt doloribus. Ullam aut voluptatem aut ipsa dolores. Omnis nisi qui quia assumenda placeat laborum dolor in.