OpenAI Hiring Ex-Bankers

Anyone see the news out about OpenAI hiring ex investment bankers to help train their models to do analyst grunt work? Curious what u guys think this means for the industry, especially with younger talent looking at these jobs

30 Comments
 

Prospect in IB - Gen

I would be very very surprised if they automate a structured finance model because I've tried using chatGPT during my internship and holy fucking shit was it BAAAAAD and I mean that: bad. 

Typically it'll be M&A models maybe TMT or Healthcare but maybe a renewables or a challenging sector would be the real metric to base their automation efforts on. 

Where was the tech 1 year ago?

Where will be in 1 year?

Where will it be in 3 years?

Where will it be in 5 years?

IMO, a lot of entry level work is very toast, including finance.

 

Its not going to leave entry level roles as a whole "toast." It will be a tool used for more efficiency. Demand for financial services specifically from humans will remain, and such humans will still "enter" the industry through some degree of an entry role. How it will impact working hours, comp, etc i dont know, but the idea the whole bullpen will be outsourced to ai is restarted

 

gpt 5 can barely spit out a coherent line of code it's going to be years before a viable product replacement rolls around 

Keep throwing monkey shit at me Sam Altman 

 

I’d be very interested to see if this will cut hours for analysts as that would be nice, but I’d assume that would come with a pay cut and people would be upset over that

 

they are going after banking for marketing purposes bc they are failing to close their funding round. why dont they build a gpt for accounting which is a way bigger industry?

zzz
 

I had a similar thought. Kind of odd to be targeting this market specifically, who exactly is it supposed be helping, the investment banks?  Where is the AI that is supposed to make peoples lives easier and more efficient… what does “no more IB analysts” achieve for broader economy?

 

Im sorry, but I am at the point where this whole topic is just pissing me off. Everyone with the exception of AI CEOs and some newly created AI bros actually believes these LLMs will do any challenging work. They are only inflating revenues with their "AI deals" and talk dreams.

 
Most Helpful

Timeline is difficult to comprehend, but once trust and accuracy is fine-tuned, I think this will especially reek havoc on the boutique and middle market firms in the next 5-10+ years.

Employment: The hierarchy may become leaner "Associate-VP-Director" teams with advanced degrees and/or have industry specialists (e.g. ex-SW engineers for Tech, Ex-lab techs for bio/life sciences) as a way for firms to differentiate. Simultaneously, firms may also have to charge lower fees and retainers, and the profession may become lower paid. I could also see law firms simply spinning up "financial advisory" offerings to clients given that lawyers build a lot of early relationships with companies on IP and other needs.

Deal Activity: Small companies hire banks largely due to not having strong internal corp dev teams to run a process. With this technology, why would a company hire a banker if they can build out a Teaser, CIM, Valuation, and buyer research with proposed terms and waterfall distributions in minutes? We may see still an execution of larger, more sophisticated deals with select firms, but a complete disintegration of middle market banking. Deal timelines will also likely go from months to weeks.

The argument that this will "free up more time" to work on other things is a pleasant facade management teams like to give. If this was true, the invention of the internet would still have mailroom workers at companies "having more free time" to work on other things.

 

We are sorta fucked. Chat cannot do anything in excel well enough, but if you ask for a bottom-up framework to analyze a company for revenue towers or like the more "thinking" parts of the modeling, it does fairly well.

But who knows, the role of a banker/investor is not just modeling anymore.

 

I still don’t get how AI will help with the workstreams - yes it will build the financial model, public comps table, precedent transactions with PPT output. But we already have pre-formatted 3 statement models to use and full table with CapIQ formulas to pull the data.


And yet when I was in IB we will literally handspread comps one-by-one to be “bespoke” for their clients’ discussion materials, or go line by line on FDD VDR report to see if there are any adjustment to QoE.


CapIQ already does all this so unless OpenAI can offer full flexibility with zero halluciation and 100% accuracy (or your MD will scream at you), not sure how this will help. Either way BB/EBs have their own proprietary AIs but last time I checked they were pretty bad. Yes, AI will get better with time, but IB is already semi-automated with all the tools we have.


Oh and don’t forget the cost of each tokens running AI - hopefully we can build data centers and energy grid quick enough to cover all the demand in an cost efficient manner

 

Voluptatem maxime tempora exercitationem pariatur. Expedita voluptatem illum voluptatum cupiditate corporis minima qui. Odit molestiae voluptatem quae adipisci totam. Tempore mollitia saepe tenetur illo beatae ipsum aut. Labore rerum id libero sunt ducimus dolorum labore sunt.

Voluptate dolorem autem cupiditate tempora dolorum itaque. Vel eius delectus enim voluptas eveniet et aut. Commodi excepturi autem voluptatem odio aut.

Iste molestiae ut perspiciatis rerum. Cupiditate enim aut ipsum. Quam nihil est fugiat molestias vero eum.

Odio necessitatibus aspernatur modi aut animi quod. Libero magni dolorum nulla. Rerum maiores id distinctio ratione omnis ea. Amet error autem iure eligendi facilis. Optio nemo velit necessitatibus eos omnis illum ullam.

 

Saepe facilis molestiae nobis. Et mollitia odit corrupti facilis. Quia eum tempora veritatis aspernatur nihil blanditiis id. Quo quas sit perspiciatis et cumque ipsa. Dolores quas et repellat similique iusto. Aliquam autem repellat corporis eaque.

Perferendis aut voluptatem rerum ratione. Fuga vitae unde officiis vitae quia voluptas quis sint. Quaerat fugit sunt non ab at. Sint sit magnam ex natus perspiciatis.

Eligendi aliquid perferendis molestiae vel. Voluptatem cupiditate nostrum excepturi voluptas animi non quas. Dignissimos non voluptatem dicta provident.

When in doubt, use more peanut butter

Career Advancement Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”