Pay Freeze for Junior Bankers - Bloomberg

Interesting article on the future of investment banking pay on Bloomberg today.

Sounds imminent to me, what are peoples thoughts? Will banks still be able to attract the talent they seek?

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-01-09/wall-str…

19 Comments
 

This is hilarious:

Younger bankers, who typically comprise about 75 percent of the investment-banking workforce of the biggest Wall Street firms, often start with a $200,000 annual salary and can expect $240,000 or $250,000 in the second year, said two senior bankers.

Of course, they're talking about associates. Analysts don't even count, lol.

 
Edmundo BravermanThis is hilarious:
Younger bankers, who typically comprise about 75 percent of the investment-banking workforce of the biggest Wall Street firms, often start with a $200,000 annual salary and can expect $240,000 or $250,000 in the second year, said two senior bankers.

Of course, they're talking about associates. Analysts don't even count, lol.

Analysts are more indentured servants than employees.

 
SpacemanSpiff
Edmundo BravermanThis is hilarious:
Younger bankers, who typically comprise about 75 percent of the investment-banking workforce of the biggest Wall Street firms, often start with a $200,000 annual salary and can expect $240,000 or $250,000 in the second year, said two senior bankers.

Of course, they're talking about associates. Analysts don't even count, lol.

Analysts are more indentured servants than employees.

Yea, kind of like what paralegals are to lawyers

"One should recognize reality even when one doesn't like it, indeed, especially when one doesn't like it." - Charlie Munger
 

"Will banks still be able to attract the talent they seek?"

In this economy can they offer positions that pay 250k/year and still get the talent they seek? Did you actually just write that?

 

PetEng, you've completely misunderstood the whole article and my point. If you use your "analytical" skills you'll be able to see that banks are thinking about stopping their high salaries. Hence, bankers won't be able to get to 250k/year unless they've been in the industry for 6 years minimum.

With the likes of the BBs cutting pay, what's to stop top bankers shifting to say Evercore, Lazard, Rothschild etc. who would be more than willing to compete on pay in order to increase their dealflow etc.

Who knows, might be the start of a power shift...

 
BSD22PetEng, you've completely misunderstood the whole article and my point. If you use your "analytical" skills you'll be able to see that banks are thinking about stopping their high salaries. Hence, bankers won't be able to get to 250k/year unless they've been in the industry for 6 years minimum.

With the likes of the BBs cutting pay, what's to stop top bankers shifting to say Evercore, Lazard, Rothschild etc. who would be more than willing to compete on pay in order to increase their dealflow etc.

Who knows, might be the start of a power shift...

if you use your analytical skills youll realize paying junior bankers to increase your dealflow is a fucking retarded idea.

almost any1 can do m&a at the junior level, i always lol when people talk about attracting top talent.

 
leveredarb if you use your analytical skills youll realize paying junior bankers to increase your dealflow is a fucking retarded idea.

almost any1 can do m&a at the junior level, i always lol when people talk about attracting top talent.

You're literally the only person that has that kind of insightful knowledge...thanks for sharing it with the rest of the world...
 

So your argument is that the factors which are affecting the BB compensation don't affect the smaller firms - fair enough. But that doesn't change regardless. The smaller firms can overpay to increase dealflow right now.

My point is that the same macro forces influencing BB comp is affecting a multitude of financial service professionals. An entire industry is being remade before our eyes.

 
Best Response
PetEngSo your argument is that the factors which are affecting the BB compensation don't affect the smaller firms - fair enough. But that doesn't change regardless. The smaller firms can overpay to increase dealflow right now.

My point is that the same macro forces influencing BB comp is affecting a multitude of financial service professionals. An entire industry is being remade before our eyes.

No, the difference is that right now the smaller firms would have to increase pay substantially to increase dealflow, whereas if the BBs reduce pay the smaller firms can maintain their current pay structure and increase deal flow by attracting talent at the same cost of doing business they are used to. I agree that we may see a change, but it won't be an entire industry changing before our eyes. It will be a more even spread of business between BBs and smaller firms, which will eventually lead to a more leveled playing field and isn't all that revolutionary part of the cycle of an industry.

 

You are much more optimistic than myself. The profitability of an entire industry is declining. I won't be surprised if salaries are lowered and stay at a reduced level for awhile.

 

It's going to be interesting regardless. I can't see junior bankers being incentivised into working crazy hours if they're only going to be getting £50-60k for their first three years etc. No one in their right mind is going to thrash out 85hour weeks for that salary without seeing a bonus or a sharp increase in pay as they proceed year on year, it's just not worth it, even though there are hundreds of young graduates who dream of this job, they just don't know what they're in stall for.

Would be interesting to see which firm makes the first move though, sounds like Credit Suisse according to the article... might be M&A suicide on their part, would be funny to see GS/MS/JP grab up some of their top bankers to boost themselves even more in Europe.

 

Interesting read, hope this isn't going to be the case to be honest. I've been slaying my fucking balls off recently and I need to see that green to make it all worth it!

You've got a point BSD with the incentives, but like you said, there are hundreds of people lining up for the job we do, so they shouldn't have a problem filling junior roles, more so they should be worried about freezing pay to the VP's and above who actually bring something more to the firm rather than excel crunching.

 
eulaI'm interested to know where 1st year Analyst starts on a salary of 200k so I can move there...

junior bankers = associates

"For I am a sinner in the hands of an angry God. Bloody Mary full of vodka, blessed are you among cocktails. Pray for me now and at the hour of my death, which I hope is soon. Amen."
 

I don't think analyst comp is a big enough portion of total comp to make it worth their time messing with. That being said, you really can't mess with associate salary without adjusting analyst salary, otherwise you'll have 3rd year analysts extremely close to 1st year associate comp. The amount of associates is so little that you would have to make huge changes to their pay in order to make it worthwhile to the firm, and when you have 3rd year analysts making $160-170k on average it makes that pretty difficult. Associates really are the least producing portion of the IB structure because they have very little client facetime (if any) and don't know much more than a decent 2nd year analyst. It makes sense that they would be the ones targeted for an adjustment, but I think the more the banks look at this they'll realize that there isn't much they can do.

 

Sound's like the banks will have to make up their minds pretty soon on what they are going to be doing regarding salary structure since many are expecting their bonus soon. The article was indicating that CS have already made their mind up and will be the first one to try and test the waters and the rest are going to follow based on how they fare.

 

Qui eius nihil suscipit cupiditate modi doloremque. Debitis non corporis voluptatem quaerat rerum impedit non. Assumenda architecto pariatur odio voluptas molestiae fugiat dolores. Est sed est amet illo cupiditate aspernatur nihil et. Delectus nihil consequatur modi voluptatibus. Consequatur est odit corporis sunt omnis. Laudantium atque qui dolores dolorem eius qui.

Vero et minus eligendi qui. Nisi optio temporibus explicabo sequi vero et consectetur.

Atque necessitatibus voluptas voluptatibus aut et quaerat sint placeat. Eos quod enim quidem culpa id ut. Ea ut sed reprehenderit neque culpa.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (67) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”