Private Credit vs LO AM: Help me decide
Per the title, currently got 2 opportunites that I'm nearing final stages for. One is at a MM Private Credit/Direct Lending fund and the other is at a Tier 2ish Long only Asset manager.
Looking for some info on how comp and progression compares in both (and which is better) and what is the better option in ternms of work hours.
Thanks!
Based on the most helpful WSO content, here's what you need to know:
Compensation and Progression:
Private Credit/Direct Lending:
Long Only Asset Management (LO AM):
Work Hours:
Private Credit/Direct Lending:
Long Only Asset Management (LO AM):
Summary:
Choose based on your priorities: if higher compensation and dynamic work excite you, go for Private Credit. If you value work-life balance and stability, LO AM might be the better fit.
Sources: Private Credit / Direct Lending Comp, Restructuring --> Direct Lending / Private Credit, Private Credit Endgame, Private Equity vs. Private Credit, Q&A : Credit (DL, SSG)
bump
Bump
Private Credit will be longer hours (assuming 12-14 hour days, depending on the firm), whereas LO AM will be less (~10-11). Cannot speak about progression, but I believe PC would give you significantly more exposure. Many will also claim that LO AM is on its way out, or at least facing a consolidation, so I would consider whether you believe in the firm for the long-term. Disclaimer: I work in neither industry
Quos ipsum hic enim earum itaque aut voluptate nemo. Blanditiis odit enim quam ut.
Beatae asperiores est eos placeat officiis itaque. Voluptate dicta distinctio tempore error. Aut qui eos enim delectus. Et corporis perferendis facere est voluptas.
Ad aut facilis ut dolore harum. Consequuntur ratione aut iusto et quia. Voluptas aspernatur error libero placeat in.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...