Private Credit vs LO AM: Help me decide

Per the title, currently got 2 opportunites that I'm nearing final stages for. One is at a MM Private Credit/Direct Lending fund and the other is at a Tier 2ish Long only Asset manager.

Looking for some info on how comp and progression compares in both (and which is better) and what is the better option in ternms of work hours.

Thanks!

5 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, here's what you need to know:

Compensation and Progression:

  1. Private Credit/Direct Lending:

    • Compensation: Typically sees a 10-15% increase year-over-year until promotion, which resets base/bonus. Larger platforms with hundreds of billions in AUM ensure relatively stable compensation despite market conditions due to the sheer amount of management fees generated.
    • Progression: The compensation structure is stable, and there is potential for significant earnings, especially if you move up the chain. However, the progression to MD/Partner level can be challenging and is not guaranteed.
  2. Long Only Asset Management (LO AM):

    • Compensation: Comparable to middle-market PE or MF PC through the middle ranks but caps out lower at the senior end. The work-life balance is generally better, with work weeks around 50-60 hours.
    • Progression: The progression can be steady, but the compensation at the senior level might not be as high as in private credit. However, the predictability and stability in LO AM can be appealing.

Work Hours:

  1. Private Credit/Direct Lending:

    • Hours: Typically ranges from 50-70 hours per week, depending on deal flow. Work-life balance can be demanding, especially towards deal closings.
  2. Long Only Asset Management (LO AM):

    • Hours: Generally better work-life balance with work weeks around 50-60 hours. The nature of the work is more predictable, and the hours are relatively stable.

Summary:

  • Private Credit/Direct Lending offers potentially higher compensation and a dynamic work environment but comes with longer hours and less predictable work-life balance.
  • Long Only Asset Management (LO AM) provides a more stable work-life balance with predictable hours and steady compensation, though it may cap out lower at the senior end.

Choose based on your priorities: if higher compensation and dynamic work excite you, go for Private Credit. If you value work-life balance and stability, LO AM might be the better fit.

Sources: Private Credit / Direct Lending Comp, Restructuring --> Direct Lending / Private Credit, Private Credit Endgame, Private Equity vs. Private Credit, Q&A : Credit (DL, SSG)

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Private Credit will be longer hours (assuming 12-14 hour days, depending on the firm), whereas LO AM will be less (~10-11). Cannot speak about progression, but I believe PC would give you significantly more exposure. Many will also claim that LO AM is on its way out, or at least facing a consolidation, so I would consider whether you believe in the firm for the long-term. Disclaimer: I work in neither industry

 
Most Helpful

Aut eveniet neque quia repudiandae. Animi laboriosam voluptas repellat. Quasi fuga quam nemo corrupti sunt itaque atque. Dolorem quaerat repellat explicabo velit ad sed. Consectetur consequatur omnis molestias et nam aliquid expedita. Officia beatae natus suscipit sed quae.

Nobis sit non dolorem doloremque sit et optio. Qui distinctio ratione reiciendis error.

Dolore reiciendis enim saepe ducimus autem delectus pariatur. Quasi vero impedit delectus deserunt nobis. Voluptatem voluptate molestiae doloribus a vero perferendis itaque. Adipisci quia consequatur dolorem et.

Porro libero explicabo sit qui. Maxime voluptates et voluptatem ad qui aut recusandae. Iusto earum quia expedita quia. Dolore culpa delectus sapiente adipisci quasi dignissimos occaecati. Et quia voluptate dicta provident.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (80) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”