Private Credit vs LO AM: Help me decide

Per the title, currently got 2 opportunites that I'm nearing final stages for. One is at a MM Private Credit/Direct Lending fund and the other is at a Tier 2ish Long only Asset manager.

Looking for some info on how comp and progression compares in both (and which is better) and what is the better option in ternms of work hours.

Thanks!

5 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, here's what you need to know:

Compensation and Progression:

  1. Private Credit/Direct Lending:

    • Compensation: Typically sees a 10-15% increase year-over-year until promotion, which resets base/bonus. Larger platforms with hundreds of billions in AUM ensure relatively stable compensation despite market conditions due to the sheer amount of management fees generated.
    • Progression: The compensation structure is stable, and there is potential for significant earnings, especially if you move up the chain. However, the progression to MD/Partner level can be challenging and is not guaranteed.
  2. Long Only Asset Management (LO AM):

    • Compensation: Comparable to middle-market PE or MF PC through the middle ranks but caps out lower at the senior end. The work-life balance is generally better, with work weeks around 50-60 hours.
    • Progression: The progression can be steady, but the compensation at the senior level might not be as high as in private credit. However, the predictability and stability in LO AM can be appealing.

Work Hours:

  1. Private Credit/Direct Lending:

    • Hours: Typically ranges from 50-70 hours per week, depending on deal flow. Work-life balance can be demanding, especially towards deal closings.
  2. Long Only Asset Management (LO AM):

    • Hours: Generally better work-life balance with work weeks around 50-60 hours. The nature of the work is more predictable, and the hours are relatively stable.

Summary:

  • Private Credit/Direct Lending offers potentially higher compensation and a dynamic work environment but comes with longer hours and less predictable work-life balance.
  • Long Only Asset Management (LO AM) provides a more stable work-life balance with predictable hours and steady compensation, though it may cap out lower at the senior end.

Choose based on your priorities: if higher compensation and dynamic work excite you, go for Private Credit. If you value work-life balance and stability, LO AM might be the better fit.

Sources: Private Credit / Direct Lending Comp, Restructuring --> Direct Lending / Private Credit, Private Credit Endgame, Private Equity vs. Private Credit, Q&A : Credit (DL, SSG)

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Private Credit will be longer hours (assuming 12-14 hour days, depending on the firm), whereas LO AM will be less (~10-11). Cannot speak about progression, but I believe PC would give you significantly more exposure. Many will also claim that LO AM is on its way out, or at least facing a consolidation, so I would consider whether you believe in the firm for the long-term. Disclaimer: I work in neither industry

 
Most Helpful

Optio eum eaque debitis quas. At temporibus non et aut omnis. Officiis blanditiis et ut pariatur. Ab dolorem nesciunt natus qui quidem saepe.

Debitis minima itaque autem aut sit numquam cum. Qui veritatis natus officiis voluptatem laborum nobis sit. Qui voluptatem quae quasi rerum repellat facere. Dolor laborum molestias consectetur omnis nulla. Consectetur iure a vero in id omnis ut et. Rem vel ut distinctio molestias incidunt.

Beatae voluptatem est atque. Voluptatem voluptas et ut repellat. Aut vel reiciendis quibusdam velit qui aut eos corrupti. Facilis ipsa nobis perferendis accusamus.

Occaecati qui itaque hic excepturi hic doloribus. Dolores modi fugit unde fugiat sint. Molestiae architecto et consequatur aliquid qui rerum accusantium consequatur. Nihil perferendis est labore rerum suscipit harum. Iusto quaerat enim deserunt amet error.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”