43 Comments
 

Have seen first hand those who don't make it and those who do.

Aside from the obvious check in the list like not stupid, detail oriented, hard working, the BIGGEST factor i've seen actually is more office politics than anything else.

Did you align yourself with current VP's that are set for ED's promotes. Is there an MD you have been working very closely with that'll vouch for your ability as a VP? Two equally good associates will face vastly different promote outcomes based, albeit unfairly, solely on their ability to have intertwined themselves with upper parts of their group

 
Most Helpful

Bankerconsu

Have seen first hand those who don't make it and those who do.

Aside from the obvious check in the list like not stupid, detail oriented, hard working, the BIGGEST factor i've seen actually is more office politics than anything else.

Did you align yourself with current VP's that are set for ED's promotes. Is there an MD you have been working very closely with that'll vouch for your ability as a VP? Two equally good associates will face vastly different promote outcomes based, albeit unfairly, solely on their ability to have intertwined themselves with upper parts of their group

What exactly happens if you DON’T make VP? I’ve heard about people getting “pushed out”. Does that literally entail a performance review whereby your boss says sorry bucko but you’re gone in a month or is it more like they just keep you at Associate 3 and promote your peers so the writing is in the wall you should probably find a new gig?

 

It's not exactly how you're phrasing it. The associate is more than likely going to read the writing on the wall and recruit either for a dif group / bank or exit to industry. Literally no associate pumping 80 + hours a week in hopes of making it to VP is going to want to stay after being told no.

 

DatAnalyst

What exactly happens if you DON'T make VP? I've heard about people getting "pushed out". Does that literally entail a performance review whereby your boss says sorry bucko but you're gone in a month or is it more like they just keep you at Associate 3 and promote your peers so the writing is in the wall you should probably find a new gig?

Two things:

  1. If I ever hear my MD use a word like "bucko", he wont have to fire me, I'll quit on the spot. LOL
  2. Your first clue will be the $0 bonus. That's the standard way to "motivate" people to send their resumes out. 
 

The only one that isn't really politics is analyst to associate.

If you're staying on as VP it likley means you have intention of somewhat being a career banker or at least are entertaining the idea for the time being. 

 

The only one that isn't really politics is analyst to associate.

I beg to differ. PE firms really be getting cheap these days. "I would like to zero out your prior experience because I want someone who can hit the ground running and continue running for the whole year, has the work ethic of a banker and is okay pulling all-nighters for lower pay than banking. But new graduates? Eww!! Give me a 2nd or 3rd year from a BB who is willing to not be paid like one"

Obviously wouldn't have taken the gig if I had another choice - I didn't due to circumstances not in my control.

 

I thought politics didn't matter nearly as much until VP, where most people get stuck. I thought promotion to VP would still largely be execution performance.

I think there's a lot to being promoted to VP and beyond. It's not always politics or even execution. Some people don't want the responsibility of management, others have a home situation that doesn't allow for more hours. In other cases I've heard that people don't want to move up because company stock becomes too much a part of the compensation so the numbers don't pencil out for them. For example, if you're a Director and decline MD because of the stock plans, well a Director still makes a salary that more than adequate for most people out there, no shame in staying at Director. 

So there's just too many variables out there to say that people are "stuck" or the cause is "office politics" - there's a lot to it. 

 

VP promotion depends on many factors. (1) You have to be a good ASO in the first place. If you suck as an ASO you won’t get promoted. If you don’t get promoted you may be out, though I know cases of people that stayed for a 4th ASO year and then got promoted (and incidentally, their career went REALLY well, made MD, got to group head, etc.). (2) Office politics matter, but to me it feels like not that much. For any firm it’s a no brainer to promote a capable ASO into a VP role, even if that means going a little bit over headcount. There’s not much difference in base salary, and you can always adjust bonus. (3) It helps on your ASO3 year to ask not being staffed with a VP above you.

 

Worked at a EB previously. The VP promo was relatively easy and was the weakest layer in my team. MDs were strong as were the gunner analysts. A2A assocs were decent but in my group, they were the ones that didn't "exit". They're all doing off cycle to exit and don't want to stay around. Depends on a lot of factors (politics, competency, etc.) but the bar was low, at least in my experience

 

VP2 at a BB NYC Industrials group. Made VP last year. I think it all boils down to "Are you ready to be put in a more client-facing role, while managing associates/analysts?" The second part obviously includes have you done a good enough job as an associate/analyst. Having that said, I haven't seen a single person from my associate class (who haven't left the firm voluntarily) that haven't made VP - though some of them got their promotions this year. From what I've seen over the years, Asso-VP promotion is pretty much a given in IBD if you've done a decent enough job. (unlike S&T where I've seen a lot of folks get fired during their AS3/VP1 year) So, no. For me it wasn't hard at all.

VP-D promotion however seems to be slightly more tricky. There's a great WSO interview that covers this topic (from associate to VP to D) so check it out. 

 

Was recently promoted after 2 years, skipping Senior Associate title. In Growth, but there's some parallels

I would proactively take on everything I possibly could, unless doing so would step on somebody's toes or I had 100% no clue what was going on. I ended up negotiating an LOI for a platform deal with minimal outside input and sourcing / signing an add-on that doubled the size of another portfolio company.

I knew I would screw some things up with this approach... but my mindset was that the things I would do correctly would outweigh that (and my firm has enough internal controls that it wasn't possible / likely to irreparably ruin something). It was a bit of a risk, but in the end everybody above me appreciated that I was taking things off their plates, anticipating what they would do, and showing that I could handle higher-level work.  

 

What about between the VP and Director level? If a VP pretty clearly isn’t on the promotion track what would they do? Is it likely that they lateral over to another bank?

 

Eaque ducimus veniam dolor vitae aliquid quo nam. Iusto odit consequatur placeat. Est rerum ut tenetur nihil mollitia recusandae. Velit consequatur magni pariatur ut deserunt animi. Dolorem totam illum aliquam suscipit officiis quia ut ea.

Nulla omnis et animi quam. Cum tempore mollitia ut iste. Impedit ratione pariatur voluptatem. Est sint fugiat ipsa ipsum ipsa quaerat qui deserunt.

 

Laboriosam aut sed voluptatibus. Impedit est voluptatum sapiente consequatur non esse mollitia. Non aut facilis commodi magni. Beatae accusamus eum ipsa iure. Suscipit in impedit omnis commodi. Culpa aliquid quis facilis.

Molestias enim in sit voluptates incidunt facere consequatur. Et eaque suscipit non nulla natus. Adipisci voluptas fugit voluptas ex mollitia. Magni nulla veniam magnam ut est corporis ea sed.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (67) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”