PWP LA vs Lazard LA

Hey all, sophomore (not from LA) interested in recruiting for LA down the line. There's been a lot of information on this forum about Moelis LA  as well as the more prominent LA BB groups (CS/MS/Barclays), but if someone can add some more insight into PWP and Lazard LA that'd be greatly appreciated!

97 Comments
 
Most Helpful

LA banker here, familiar with both groups, so I can provide some insight.

Lazard LA is around 35-40 people split across Aerospace & Defense and Interactive Media & Gaming. I believe analysts are staffed across both verticals. Both groups have been historically pretty strong, with A&D making a killing on MM sponsor-related deals and Media working on a lot of M&A, strategic advisory, and growth capital deals. The former office head (who was more involved on the interactive tech/media side) left for JPM in 2020, but the office reloaded by hiring a really strong senior, and deal flow in media and gaming has been really good (if you're interested in the media and gaming space the office is probably one of the best in terms of getting interesting deal experience). A&D lost one of their rainmakers to PWP just earlier this year, which has really affected their deal flow and momentum. They still have a solid senior bench, but the practice is definitely not as strong as it used to be. Culturally, I've heard the A&D side tends to be pretty fratty, while the media side tends to be a bit more buttoned-up. The seniors are great in both (media senior is a great guy, the A&D rainmaker who went to PWP was an amazing senior from what I've heard), and people are generally pretty nice, but both sides do sweat and get grinded. Historically, the office brings on 3 summer analysts each year, from what I've heard, and I think 2 are filled in the accelerated/diversity recruiting process. Exits have been solid historically with a handful MF and mostly top West-coast UMM and MMs.

PWP LA is pretty new office founded in 2017 by seniors from BofA, and has     ~25 people now. The office used to be purely industrials (focused on E&C, industrial services, environmental services, multi-industrials), but PWP's really been focused on growing out the office and hired 3 new partners in the past year (one focusing on A&D as mentioned earlier, one focused on P&U and energy transition who is apparently a huge baller in the space, and one focused on software/internet). From what I've heard, although the P&U senior will be collaborating with TPH, all deals out of the office will be staffed within the office and won't be outsourced, so analysts will a really diverse experience across very different verticals. Culture in the group is good, with really chill people. Where Lazard LA is a bit frattier, PWP LA definitely gives off a bit more of an intellectual "nerdy" vibe driven by both seniors and the deal flow. The seniors (especially the ones from BofA) are known to get their hands dirty in the modelling all the time. The office also tends to focus a bit more on mid- to large-cap deals often involving long-time public clients, so the modelling work tends to be more technical, although I'm sure the Lazard A&D partner will still be focusing on more MM-level deals. The office is really lean, so when things get busy things get sweaty. The SA class size is 4 I believe, but given the expansion in senior headcount, I can imagine the analyst class expanding to 5 or even 6 in the next recruiting cycle. Exits have also been solid historically, although slightly below Lazard LA given PWP LA is a newer and smaller office.

Overall, both offices are great. Lazard LA has historically been the more established office, but over the past 2 years they've faced a surprising amount of senior turnover given how stable they were pre-2020. PWP LA is newer and currently smaller, but they're a really fast growing office and I've heard rumors that future expansion in the works might bring their headcount up to 40-50 people (they're also moving into a much larger physical office from what I've heard). The offices are focused on different industries, with PWP's experience likely becoming a bit more of a "generalist" experience (across Industrials, Tech, and P&U) as the new seniors ramp up while Lazard LA doesn't really have any plans to expand industry coverage. Culture is great across both offices, but both groups are very hardworking so don't choose them for lifestyle over any other LA groups. In terms of exits, Lazard's traditionally been a bit better better given they're more established and had larger analyst classes, but you'll be getting the same looks from both groups. 

Both groups are pretty hard to recruit into though. Although PWP LA will likely be expanding their class size in the near future, PWP LA is very UCLA/USC/Wharton-heavy and look for people with LA roots, so make sure to network to have a chance at breaking in. Lazard LA is a bit more open to other schools and has more diverse undergraduate/geographic representation, but they've traditionally reserved 2/3 spots for their accelerated recruitment process, and I don't think they'll be expanding their SA class size in the future as the office as a whole isn't in growth-mode like PWP LA is. Obviously, if you're interested in LA banking, you should be networking with and recruiting for both groups. Hope this helps!

 

Lazard LA alum here, and can echo most of this. Laz LA has undergone some turnover at the top since I left (RIP to Lazard LA for losing Steve, man was awesome as a dealmaker and as a person to work with), but they'll survive. Haven't followed PWP LA's recent senior hires too closely, but sounds like it'll definitely be an interesting office from the junior perspective, getting staffed across industrials/tech/P&U. PWP will probably be the closest thing to a generalist junior experience in LA besides Moelis.

 

Doesn't appear true... per LinkedIn, only 1/3rd of their current/incoming analysts went to USC/UCLA and less than half even went to school in California.

 

A bit unrelated to Lazard & PWP, but thoughts on BofA LA? Especially in terms of exits?

 

The LA Airforce Base in El Segundo is home to the Space Systems Command which does all the R&D of US military space-related systems. Because of this, defense contractors like Boeing, Raytheon, and Northrup Grumman (among others) have a major presence in the South Bay, hence why SpaceX is based in Hawthorne. The historical relationship goes back to pre-WWII actually. In fact, I think as much as half the entire US aerospace industry was LA-based until the 70s. Hughes Aircraft (now Raytheon), Lockheed (Lockheed Martin), and Douglas Aircraft (of McDonnell Douglas, now Boeing) were all founded in the greater LA area. A lot of the early growth was because of the talent coming out of CalTech which was one of few schools in the US with an aeronautics program at that time.

 

Great deal experience from both places. Lazard LA's a lot of MM-oriented deals on the A&D side, and MM-mid-cap M&A, capital raises, and "strategic advisory" (eg. helping studios form partnerships with other studios) on the interactive media side. PWP LA has traditionally been whale-hunters (focused on large-cap and mid-cap M&A) as well as "strategic advisory" for long-time blue-chip clients. That being said, PWP's new partners will likely change things up. The ex-JPM P&U partner will probably add large-cap advisory (for P&U clients) in-line with the office's current deal flow, but the A&D partner will likely churn out a lot of MM-oriented A&D deals like he did at Lazard while the new tech partner will probably also bring a lot more growth-oriented cap raises in addition to M&A.

 

Take my advice - Do not recruit for LA, especially if you're not from the area. Go for NY, so much more opportunity unless you're at Moelis. 

 

Going to have to disagree with this. Breaking into LA IB if you’re not from LA is significantly harder, but if you want to be in LA over NY LA is not bad at all. NY naturally has more finance opportunities than almost every other city by nature, but most LA bankers I know in good groups had no trouble placing all along WC, Chicago, and NY PE. While most people end up in WC PE, that’s more of a function of most people in LA IB preferring WC, and those who wanted to make the move to other geographies were able to do so.

 

Agreed - there's a lot of self-selection bias when it comes to LA. Most people who recruit for LA IB have strong roots or a strong geographical preference for LA / WC, and tend to primarily recruit for WC PE when the time comes. Most of those who wanted to move to other geographies were able to do so during PE recruiting of the people I know. 

 

SF and Chicago are both very industry-focused. A prospect can emphasize "Why Tech/HC" for SF, "Why Energy" for Houston, and "Why Industrials" for Chicago, even if they don't have a strong preference/story for the geography. LA tends to be a lot more diverse in terms of industry and really doesn't have a "central" industry like SF or Chicago (LA has a  large C&R, Media & Telecom, and REGL presence, but also has a pretty strong industrials, technology, sponsors, HC, and even FIG presence), so the "why LA" story is a lot more important than the why this story industry.

Same thing for other banking centers that aren't centered around certain industries, like Charlotte.

 

Can't speak for hou or sf but chi is more diverse than you might think

has industrials, fig, c&r, regl teams

 

Friend interned at PWP LA, and heard good things about the culture there. Apparently there's no face time culture and the team is pretty tight-knit at all levels. Work is pretty technical, and the head of the office often gets into the weeds of the modelling with the juniors. Definitely sounds like an exciting place to be given their new senior hires.

 

Although I wouldn't completely agree that Lazard LA has a more diversified recruitment pool of undergrads, it seems to be quite accurate. They continue to draw a lion's share of its SA class from USC and UCLA.

Both offices have a large surfing culture as well.

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Both offices are great in terms of deal experience and culture, and arguing about exits is honestly splitting hairs between the offices. Lazard LA has been around for much longer than PWP LA has and is larger, but PWP LA appears to be in extreme growth mode while Lazard LA isn't, so PWP LA may end up being larger than Lazard LA in the next few years. In the end, choosing between the offices (if you end up fortunate enough to be in that position) should come down to industry preference and fit.

Interestingly, in a city run by alumni from DLJ as well as DLJ's successors (CS/UBS LA), neither office has DLJ roots. Maybe that's the reason behind the relatively better cultures at Lazard LA and PWP LA compared to the offices with significant DLJ DNA (Moelis, CS, Barclays, UBS, MS).

 

Et molestiae repudiandae dicta officiis quae minus. Qui est tempora labore est aspernatur. Blanditiis saepe velit recusandae vel.

Sed et alias quo et consequatur odio. Aut voluptas sit enim nihil aut et suscipit. Beatae voluptas rem tenetur sint qui nostrum cumque. Soluta ut omnis in nobis. Sit et veritatis ut nemo qui.

Dolorum cum commodi nemo sed hic perferendis temporibus. Nam tempora et omnis perspiciatis debitis qui numquam. Voluptatum eos illo asperiores molestiae vel dolorum consequatur.

 

Aut cumque harum reprehenderit ut rerum omnis. Quia aut ipsum perspiciatis enim et illo reiciendis. Autem inventore dolor atque ipsam ab in porro.

Placeat velit aut tenetur ut. Quisquam excepturi suscipit ratione deserunt cum sed eum maiores. Vero occaecati quaerat nobis perspiciatis quas.

Ullam eos ratione sint voluptas delectus distinctio. Accusamus earum qui consequuntur earum dicta ut nemo. Qui voluptatum consequatur eaque ab aut at. Beatae dolorem optio itaque voluptatem atque.

Quas perferendis temporibus voluptas impedit. Culpa est ipsa nisi sunt velit. Ullam rerum ab similique beatae aut voluptatibus. Placeat ex eaque molestiae debitis dolore et. Aut dolor animi voluptas. Minima repellat doloremque placeat ut ut optio. Commodi placeat ea repellat commodi maiores.

 

Delectus reprehenderit consequuntur nulla ut consequuntur facere sed. Ut consequuntur dolorem omnis dolorem enim. Sed veritatis id doloribus hic.

Accusamus nihil aliquam minima omnis. Labore sunt libero dignissimos ut ut provident. Nesciunt illo provident recusandae aspernatur eum non sint.

Est ratione pariatur non aut eum. Adipisci accusantium rerum dolore unde. Non rem explicabo molestiae illo repellendus maxime. Voluptas sit consequatur aut et iusto et et.

Aliquid harum et impedit rem. Architecto quos totam enim harum enim.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.7%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”