Global Announced M&A - YTD as of 3Q 2010:
1. GS
2. MS
3. JPM
4. CS
5. BAML
6. Deutsche
7. BarCap
8. UBS
9. Lazard
10. Citi
Global Completed M&A - YTD as of 3Q 2010:
1. GS
2. MS
3. Citi
4. JPM
5. CS
6. BarCap
7. UBS
8. BAML
9. Deutsche
10. Lazard
The stark contrast in Announced vs. Completed so far this year can largely be accounted for by the few headline-busy mega-deals that are being contested and haven't completed yet, that is if they go through at all (i.e. BHP Billiton - Potash, Sanofi Aventis - Genzyme, etc).
Very surprised to see Citi so low in the Announced league table as it's been in the top 5 every year for the last 10 years. Also surprised to see how well CS is doing this year in M&A.
Subjectively, whichever one boosts your bank/MD's ego more lol. Objectively, you still do plenty of work for an announced deal that doesn't go through (been there, shitty feeling), but a merger that doesn't go through isn't really a merger, and you can't really be proud of it.
Just don't take league tables too seriously (for example, to make an offer selection decision), especially when there's a full quarter left to go in the year. One BB being a rank, or even 3, above another doesn't mean very much.
But I do agree to some extent about Completed vs. Announced. These tables are severely skewed due to BHP-Potash, which had a cumulative 9 financial advisors (4 BB's) for the two sides. 2 advisors on one side is inefficient enough, I can't even imagine the team dynamics and internal politics on that deal lol.
ShawnFireLol @ Diamonds trying to praise Barclays everywhere
full disclosure: I am accepting Barcap fulltime
Good decision, but I am not trying to push BarCap or anything. I was just giving the OP what he was asking for - it seems as though the person who responded first just happened to leave out the US tables. I also thought everyone would of wanted to see global debt & equity considering it accounts for the rest of the investment banking business.
Don't blame me if the numbers look nice; these are just the standard tables.
ShawnFireLol @ Diamonds trying to praise Barclays everywhere
full disclosure: I am accepting Barcap fulltime
Good decision, but I am not trying to push BarCap or anything. I was just giving the OP what he was asking for - it seems as though the person who responded first just happened to leave out the US tables. I also thought everyone would of wanted to see global debt & equity considering it accounts for the rest of the investment banking business.
Don't blame me if the numbers look nice; these are just the standard tables.
OP: see if you can get it off Thomson yourself
if i remember correctly, as long as you give an email address that is not a typical email (e.g. yahoo, gmail, hotmail) you should get it
this is esp if you're not interested in the US. i see that this is what the above posts are about
In deserunt quam eos rem ut. Voluptatem deserunt eum labore quas autem delectus ut. Ut ducimus et laboriosam placeat facere. Nulla est doloribus voluptatem labore.
Asperiores commodi corrupti commodi omnis. Repudiandae cupiditate inventore tenetur sunt ullam et. Ut qui consequatur et. Ipsam qui et eos est.
Ut non quos similique iure sint velit. Ipsum nulla nobis saepe vitae dolor accusamus. Dolore nesciunt dolorem omnis ut inventore qui.
Quia vel deleniti adipisci minima fugit inventore et. Est rerum iusto iure numquam fuga. Molestias cumque corporis aut ut aperiam dolor est. Facere voluptas consequatur consequatur ut beatae. Nostrum facere ut voluptate id qui.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
Nostrum velit omnis et rerum quos vitae. Itaque cumque eum velit. Aliquid sint quidem deleniti debitis. Maiores non quam vitae culpa ea sit veniam. Et ipsa quia sit. Dolor hic et rerum exercitationem soluta. Excepturi voluptas rerum debitis dolorem molestiae qui exercitationem.
Ut aut ex sit saepe. Unde voluptatem in ducimus eligendi dolor.
Sorry, you need to login or sign up in order to vote. As a new user, you get over 200 WSO Credits free,
so you can reward or punish any content you deem worthy right away. See you on the other side!
Source: Thomson Reuters Deal Intelligence
Global Announced M&A - YTD as of 3Q 2010: 1. GS 2. MS 3. JPM 4. CS 5. BAML 6. Deutsche 7. BarCap 8. UBS 9. Lazard 10. Citi
Global Completed M&A - YTD as of 3Q 2010: 1. GS 2. MS 3. Citi 4. JPM 5. CS 6. BarCap 7. UBS 8. BAML 9. Deutsche 10. Lazard
The stark contrast in Announced vs. Completed so far this year can largely be accounted for by the few headline-busy mega-deals that are being contested and haven't completed yet, that is if they go through at all (i.e. BHP Billiton - Potash, Sanofi Aventis - Genzyme, etc).
Very surprised to see Citi so low in the Announced league table as it's been in the top 5 every year for the last 10 years. Also surprised to see how well CS is doing this year in M&A.
What is generally considered more relevant? Completed or Announced.
Subjectively, whichever one boosts your bank/MD's ego more lol. Objectively, you still do plenty of work for an announced deal that doesn't go through (been there, shitty feeling), but a merger that doesn't go through isn't really a merger, and you can't really be proud of it.
Quite surprised at Barcap. If they continue like this they might actually be taken seriously.
Thanks cn monkey: but announced is nothing compared to completed. Citi being top 3 completed is definitely a strong showing.
Thanks cn monkey: but announced is nothing compared to completed. Citi being top 3 completed is definitely a strong showing, beating out JPM (4th).
Just don't take league tables too seriously (for example, to make an offer selection decision), especially when there's a full quarter left to go in the year. One BB being a rank, or even 3, above another doesn't mean very much.
But I do agree to some extent about Completed vs. Announced. These tables are severely skewed due to BHP-Potash, which had a cumulative 9 financial advisors (4 BB's) for the two sides. 2 advisors on one side is inefficient enough, I can't even imagine the team dynamics and internal politics on that deal lol.
US Announced M&A - YTD as of 3Q 2010: 1. Goldman Sachs 2. Morgan Stanley 3. JP Morgan 4. Credit Suisse 5. Barclays Capital 6. BAML 7. Deutsche Bank 8. UBS 9. Citi 10. Lazard
US Completed M&A - YTD as of 3Q 2010: 1. Goldman Sachs 2. Barclays Capital 3. JP Morgan 4. Citi 5. Morgan Stanley 6. Deutsche Bank 7. BAML 8. Credit Suisse 9. UBS 10. Evercore Partners
LOL
Global Debt & Equity - YTD as of 3Q 2010: 1. JP Morgan 2. Barclays Capital 3. BAML 4. Deutsche Bank 5. Morgan Stanley 6. Citi 7. Credit Suisse 8. Goldman Sachs & Co 9. UBS 10. RBS
Lol @ Diamonds trying to praise Barclays everywhere
full disclosure: I am accepting Barcap fulltime
Good decision, but I am not trying to push BarCap or anything. I was just giving the OP what he was asking for - it seems as though the person who responded first just happened to leave out the US tables. I also thought everyone would of wanted to see global debt & equity considering it accounts for the rest of the investment banking business.
Don't blame me if the numbers look nice; these are just the standard tables.
I could have posted the Global Debt league tables
Barcap is 6th, its okay but not great.
surprising that gs is so low in debt and equity
How is Barcap beating BAML in capital markets????... wtf?
have. could have
OP: see if you can get it off Thomson yourself if i remember correctly, as long as you give an email address that is not a typical email (e.g. yahoo, gmail, hotmail) you should get it
this is esp if you're not interested in the US. i see that this is what the above posts are about
You can see the Thomson League Tables here:
http://markets.ft.com/investmentBanking/tablesAndTrends.asp
Dealogic Global M&A Rankings by Fees
1) GS 2) JPM 3) MS 4) DB 5) BAML 6) CS 7) UBS 8) Citi 9) Lazard 10) Rothschild
Dealogic US M&A Rankings by Fees
1) GS 2) JPM 3) MS 4) BAML 5) DB 6) Citi 7) BarCap 8) CS 9) Lazard 10) UBS
Top 10 Banks by Overall Fees 1) JPM 2) BAML 3) GS 4) MS 5) DB 6) CS 7) Citi 8) BarCap 9) UBS 10) RBS
FT also has a list of top banks for each industry if you click on the above link and then on the Banking Leader's tab.
JPM / BAML ... looks like the universal bank structure is the way to go. Their large capital markets capabilities really seem to be paying off...
In deserunt quam eos rem ut. Voluptatem deserunt eum labore quas autem delectus ut. Ut ducimus et laboriosam placeat facere. Nulla est doloribus voluptatem labore.
Asperiores commodi corrupti commodi omnis. Repudiandae cupiditate inventore tenetur sunt ullam et. Ut qui consequatur et. Ipsam qui et eos est.
Ut non quos similique iure sint velit. Ipsum nulla nobis saepe vitae dolor accusamus. Dolore nesciunt dolorem omnis ut inventore qui.
Quia vel deleniti adipisci minima fugit inventore et. Est rerum iusto iure numquam fuga. Molestias cumque corporis aut ut aperiam dolor est. Facere voluptas consequatur consequatur ut beatae. Nostrum facere ut voluptate id qui.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Nostrum velit omnis et rerum quos vitae. Itaque cumque eum velit. Aliquid sint quidem deleniti debitis. Maiores non quam vitae culpa ea sit veniam. Et ipsa quia sit. Dolor hic et rerum exercitationem soluta. Excepturi voluptas rerum debitis dolorem molestiae qui exercitationem.
Ut aut ex sit saepe. Unde voluptatem in ducimus eligendi dolor.