Recent League Tables?
Anyone have the top 10 global and top 10 U.S. league tables as of most recent quarter?
Thanks!
Trending Content - Investment Banking Forum
| +228 | Downfall of Qatalyst | 44 | 2h |
| +168 | UBS IB 26Q2 a Disaster! Advisory Revenue Down 23%, Capital MarketsDown 5% | 22 | 3d |
| +111 | UBS Americas IB: The Kids’ Table of Wall Street | 15 | 20h |
| +81 | Lincoln International Return Offers | 42 | 1d |
| +53 | so confused about 28 SA timeline | 27 | 6d |
| +52 | London IB BB is a challenge | 33 | 2h |
| +38 | momentum of Rx groups | 12 | 1m |
| +37 | Fired during interview | 6 | 1d |
| +36 | [WSO MODS] Please Delete This BS Host Books Spam! | 2 | 5d |
| +30 | VP Lifestyle at Top BB Coverage Groups | 16 | 38m |
Career Resources
Source: Thomson Reuters Deal Intelligence
Global Announced M&A - YTD as of 3Q 2010: 1. GS 2. MS 3. JPM 4. CS 5. BAML 6. Deutsche 7. BarCap 8. UBS 9. Lazard 10. Citi
Global Completed M&A - YTD as of 3Q 2010: 1. GS 2. MS 3. Citi 4. JPM 5. CS 6. BarCap 7. UBS 8. BAML 9. Deutsche 10. Lazard
The stark contrast in Announced vs. Completed so far this year can largely be accounted for by the few headline-busy mega-deals that are being contested and haven't completed yet, that is if they go through at all (i.e. BHP Billiton - Potash, Sanofi Aventis - Genzyme, etc).
Very surprised to see Citi so low in the Announced league table as it's been in the top 5 every year for the last 10 years. Also surprised to see how well CS is doing this year in M&A.
What is generally considered more relevant? Completed or Announced.
Subjectively, whichever one boosts your bank/MD's ego more lol. Objectively, you still do plenty of work for an announced deal that doesn't go through (been there, shitty feeling), but a merger that doesn't go through isn't really a merger, and you can't really be proud of it.
Quite surprised at Barcap. If they continue like this they might actually be taken seriously.
Thanks cn monkey: but announced is nothing compared to completed. Citi being top 3 completed is definitely a strong showing.
Thanks cn monkey: but announced is nothing compared to completed. Citi being top 3 completed is definitely a strong showing, beating out JPM (4th).
Just don't take league tables too seriously (for example, to make an offer selection decision), especially when there's a full quarter left to go in the year. One BB being a rank, or even 3, above another doesn't mean very much.
But I do agree to some extent about Completed vs. Announced. These tables are severely skewed due to BHP-Potash, which had a cumulative 9 financial advisors (4 BB's) for the two sides. 2 advisors on one side is inefficient enough, I can't even imagine the team dynamics and internal politics on that deal lol.
US Announced M&A - YTD as of 3Q 2010: 1. Goldman Sachs 2. Morgan Stanley 3. JP Morgan 4. Credit Suisse 5. Barclays Capital 6. BAML 7. Deutsche Bank 8. UBS 9. Citi 10. Lazard
US Completed M&A - YTD as of 3Q 2010: 1. Goldman Sachs 2. Barclays Capital 3. JP Morgan 4. Citi 5. Morgan Stanley 6. Deutsche Bank 7. BAML 8. Credit Suisse 9. UBS 10. Evercore Partners
LOL
Global Debt & Equity - YTD as of 3Q 2010: 1. JP Morgan 2. Barclays Capital 3. BAML 4. Deutsche Bank 5. Morgan Stanley 6. Citi 7. Credit Suisse 8. Goldman Sachs & Co 9. UBS 10. RBS
Lol @ Diamonds trying to praise Barclays everywhere
full disclosure: I am accepting Barcap fulltime
Good decision, but I am not trying to push BarCap or anything. I was just giving the OP what he was asking for - it seems as though the person who responded first just happened to leave out the US tables. I also thought everyone would of wanted to see global debt & equity considering it accounts for the rest of the investment banking business.
Don't blame me if the numbers look nice; these are just the standard tables.
I could have posted the Global Debt league tables
Barcap is 6th, its okay but not great.
surprising that gs is so low in debt and equity
How is Barcap beating BAML in capital markets????... wtf?
have. could have
OP: see if you can get it off Thomson yourself if i remember correctly, as long as you give an email address that is not a typical email (e.g. yahoo, gmail, hotmail) you should get it
this is esp if you're not interested in the US. i see that this is what the above posts are about
You can see the Thomson League Tables here:
http://markets.ft.com/investmentBanking/tablesAndTrends.asp
Dealogic Global M&A Rankings by Fees
1) GS 2) JPM 3) MS 4) DB 5) BAML 6) CS 7) UBS 8) Citi 9) Lazard 10) Rothschild
Dealogic US M&A Rankings by Fees
1) GS 2) JPM 3) MS 4) BAML 5) DB 6) Citi 7) BarCap 8) CS 9) Lazard 10) UBS
Top 10 Banks by Overall Fees 1) JPM 2) BAML 3) GS 4) MS 5) DB 6) CS 7) Citi 8) BarCap 9) UBS 10) RBS
FT also has a list of top banks for each industry if you click on the above link and then on the Banking Leader's tab.
JPM / BAML ... looks like the universal bank structure is the way to go. Their large capital markets capabilities really seem to be paying off...
Facilis aut consectetur eum perferendis. Fugit assumenda aut sed ipsa. Maiores odit qui explicabo quidem.
A est iusto sed officiis. Adipisci saepe rerum maxime vero consequatur quod.
Et delectus aut laudantium voluptate. Eos minus reprehenderit ut ducimus labore ab cumque. Saepe dolor esse id est et et provident vero. Eum sit ad quis quidem.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Deleniti quis consequuntur consequuntur voluptates. In voluptatem qui est autem. Ea id fugit a occaecati.