Thought about just posting the current advisor rankings, since 2015 , for anyone curious what the split looks like across a long time period. Note that this combines the investment bankers and consultants because sometimes consultants do RX IB work for smaller deals as well, so this is probably more accurate than segregating the two, since the lines aren't clearly delineated.
| +285 | Return Rates For Interns Are Falling? | 118 | 1h |
| +126 | Article: Why UBS's Asian M&A bankers are thriving and UBS's American M&A bankers are not | 13 | 7h |
| +114 | I am a drunk MD AMA | 39 | 1d |
| +79 | UBS Offer Day | 27 | 6h |
| +64 | VP Lifestyle at Top BB Coverage Groups | 40 | 2d |
| +57 | An Outsider’s View of RX Banking Out of College | 6 | 5d |
| +51 | No return so what are the options left | 32 | 2h |
| +51 | Evercore > Goldman and I don’t think it’s particularly close anymore | 28 | 1h |
| +41 | WF Return offers | 28 | 2h |
| +41 | I hate Wells Fargo | 9 | 1h |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
How tf did HL end up with almost triple the dealflow as PJT...when talking about total liabilities??
it might be PJT ex. blackstone, not sure how far back this ranking goes
Sorry, should've clarified that in the post, this is since 2015
HL is massive compared to PJT, on a per head basis they’re probably ahead of
Yeah but 1.7 trillion is wild, that's more than basically every other bank on here combined...wonder if HL gets the majority of restructurings each year
Anyone in the RX world will know how they do it: ay deal they lose to PJT/EVR/MOE on Co/1L, they represent the shitty Out of the Money group on huge deals so they can say that they worked on $xxxbn deal. Huge volume, but significantly fewer meaningful creditor/debtor mandates than above peers; nothing wrong with it just playing a diff game
However in the "client" section, it says that the majority of their clients are debtor mandates, followed by creditor mandates, and a very limited out of the money groups, so maybe they just get a majority of MM deals?
Curious about Dundon, have not really heard of them so was wondering if anyone is familiar with the firm?
Provident quia pariatur odio. Illum quia assumenda deleniti quis rerum. Qui iusto sed velit cupiditate et minima. Non debitis deserunt veritatis aut voluptates excepturi ab.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...