Technical question - IPO pricing, please help

Hello, I was reviewing a guide and am confused by this question / answer:

Walk me through an IPO valuation for a company that’s about to go public.

  1. Unlike normal valuations, for an IPO valuation we only care about public company comparables.
  2. After picking the public company comparables we decide on the most relevant multiple to use and then estimate our company’s Enterprise Value based on that.
  3. Once we have the Enterprise Value, we work backward to get to equity value and also subtract the IPO proceeds because this is “new” cash.
  4. Then we divide by the total number of shares (old and newly created) to get its per-share price. When people say “An IPO priced at…” this is what they’re referring to.

I don't really understand this at all. First, for step 3, why would you deduct the proceeds? Shouldn't the pro forma share price = (status quo implied equity value + new proceeds) / (existing shares + new shares)?

Second, for step 4, isn't this circular? You need the price to get newly created shares and vice versa. I can't seem to get excel to solve something like this.

Most importantly, why is this not simply: (existing implied equity value) / (existing shares) = IPO price?

Would really appreciate some help!

9 Comments
 
Best Response

I believe for step 3, your guide meant that you will add the net cash proceeds from the offering to the current cash balance, which will then be subtracted from debt in the calculation of Pro Forma Net Debt. The net effect is that it will be added to Enterprise Value on the way to equity value, as you suggested. The guide is poorly worded. Your formula for pro forma share price is thus essentially correct. You should create a sources & uses table, as well, which should account for the allocation of proceeds (which are often used to pay down debt, repurchase existing shares, or close on a pre-negotiated acquisition).

As for circularity, your input should be "gross IPO size," so you are neither telling your model how many shares to offer, nor the price. Don't forget to lop off about 6-8% of the gross proceeds as underwriting spread and fees, then allocate the next amount to your pro forma equity calculation. There will be circularity between your share price and share count, but Excel can handle this easily via iteration.

 

The guide also says: If you were using P / E or any other “Equity Value-based multiple” for the multiple in step #2 here, then you would get to Equity Value instead and then subtract the IPO proceeds from there.

While Re-ib-ny's rational makes logical sense to me, it sounds like the guide in fact suggests to deduct IPO proceeds (=new cash) in the process of getting to Equity Value. Does anyone know why this, or if this is even correct?

Sorry for pushing such an old thread but I haven't found anything more recent on this subject.

Thanks and Happy New Year!

 

You subtract IPO proceeds to get the "Pre money"-equity value, i.e. the value of the company before the company is actually offered to the public. On a per-share basis, the value before/after the IPO will naturally be the same, but the total equity value will be higher after the IPO(but divided by a higher number of shares).

 

Rerum a excepturi ea optio sunt atque quia earum. Provident suscipit ratione rerum. Aperiam laborum dolor veniam sunt.

Corporis aut reiciendis corporis cum. Maxime quae consequatur facere. Non aut iure aperiam nemo dolorum qui ea. Cupiditate cumque in est architecto error. Quos aliquid dicta qui sed dolor eius maxime. Eveniet odio recusandae libero ut libero.

Quod dolor eos non commodi dignissimos. Et aperiam facere illum nemo repellat. Sapiente omnis voluptatem cumque itaque soluta sit possimus. Ut omnis esse fuga quia. Atque natus est beatae nemo asperiores et.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (66) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”