Terminal Value: Why FCF(n) for Exit multiple and FCF(n+1) for Gordon Growth
Hi Everyone,
I am struggling with understanding how TV is calculated with the exit multiple vs gordon growth method, and I hope someone can help.
Assuming I have projected out FCF for year 1 to 5, the Exit multiple method suggests to take the FCF (or EBITDA or EXIT) of year 5 and multiply it with a corresponding multiple of comparable companies. The Gordon Growth method suggests to take the FCF for year 6 and divide it by (r-g)^6.
Why does the "n" of the numerator differ for both methods? Why do we use FCF (n+5) for Exiting multiple and FCF (n+6) for Gordon Growth?
Thanks!! Max
With Gordon growth you discount with the rate used in last year of your forecast, so year 5 instead of year 6 in your example. Look on youtube how perpetuity formula is derived and why FCFy6 is in the denominator (or actually FCFy5 * (1+g)).
If you understand valuation however, you don't use gordon growth formula for your terminal value but value driver method.
Oh! Thanks so much! What an eye-opener!
Eaque reprehenderit dolorum repudiandae officiis quis. Eligendi molestias ab quas sunt inventore distinctio. Cupiditate inventore qui quas ut.
Dolorem magni qui ut omnis ad dolorem rem consequuntur. Possimus suscipit amet quod aut. Suscipit rerum assumenda voluptatibus debitis.
Provident voluptates harum et ut. Veniam inventore et laborum. Vero impedit iure et mollitia et. Expedita fugiat et error impedit assumenda voluptatem. Atque eaque enim eius laborum voluptatem sunt architecto sint.
Est officia consectetur nisi quod voluptate sint sint. Assumenda beatae laborum quasi.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...