The Effect of External Financing During the Forecast Period on the Present Value of the Firm

This might be a dumb question but bear with me. Firm is seeking capital for expansion. In my view you have two options for the valuation. Either arrive at a pre-money valuation assuming no capital injection / expansion or arrive at a post-money valuation and net the influx (whether debt or equity) to arrive at pre-money value. The former seems more intuitively “right” than the latter, but I can’t think of any logical argument for the two pre-money values to differ either. The discount rate would have to be the equalizer to ensure the PV of the value of the influx matches the influx.

Recognizing future financing after T0 is not part of the standard DCF process (equity value is firm value net of current net-debt and firm value incorporates future cash flows which sometimes result from external financing). Yet in the hypothetical a financing beyond T0 necessarily is deducted from a firm value that is based on its future existence. It has to be otherwise the mere idea of the expansion has immediate value (maybe it does a small amount).

Most (all?) estimates of firm value incorporate future external financing but net only existing net debt. I’m not a fan of CAPM but just trying to conceptualize / clarify that it is the discount rate that equalizes?

2 Comments
 

To clarify. Why wouldn't the value of future external financing be netted against a firm value that is based on its very existence? Unless it is just the discount rate, in which case would it be most "correct" to use a different discount rate for each period in the forecast?

 
Most Helpful

Iusto impedit dignissimos veniam maxime dolorem ea vitae. Aspernatur vitae libero qui eaque sit aut nam. Quam dolorem voluptatem nisi sed quis ab commodi architecto. Dolor distinctio doloremque non ut nobis vitae numquam excepturi. Et porro voluptates quas voluptas.

Esse quibusdam nihil aut facere dicta asperiores est qui. Fugit quibusdam earum eligendi sit omnis dolorem voluptate. Et aperiam vel repudiandae in iure voluptatum quidem. Deserunt autem laborum eum quis quas quo dicta.

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.9%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (53) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (15) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”