The Effect of External Financing During the Forecast Period on the Present Value of the Firm

This might be a dumb question but bear with me. Firm is seeking capital for expansion. In my view you have two options for the valuation. Either arrive at a pre-money valuation assuming no capital injection / expansion or arrive at a post-money valuation and net the influx (whether debt or equity) to arrive at pre-money value. The former seems more intuitively “right” than the latter, but I can’t think of any logical argument for the two pre-money values to differ either. The discount rate would have to be the equalizer to ensure the PV of the value of the influx matches the influx.

Recognizing future financing after T0 is not part of the standard DCF process (equity value is firm value net of current net-debt and firm value incorporates future cash flows which sometimes result from external financing). Yet in the hypothetical a financing beyond T0 necessarily is deducted from a firm value that is based on its future existence. It has to be otherwise the mere idea of the expansion has immediate value (maybe it does a small amount).

Most (all?) estimates of firm value incorporate future external financing but net only existing net debt. I’m not a fan of CAPM but just trying to conceptualize / clarify that it is the discount rate that equalizes?

2 Comments
 

To clarify. Why wouldn't the value of future external financing be netted against a firm value that is based on its very existence? Unless it is just the discount rate, in which case would it be most "correct" to use a different discount rate for each period in the forecast?

 
Most Helpful

Harum aut cumque et unde expedita at. Odit quo consectetur ut maiores consectetur. Vitae qui rem nisi impedit ullam aperiam quod. Quae totam enim at a voluptas eos dolor. Hic quia sapiente quod accusamus. Eos consequatur dolorem deserunt dolore.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan No 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”