The reason why Goldman Sachs may change strategy

Goldman Sachs has long been known for its “black box” strategy. Investors can point to solid earnings and revenues, but reports show very little about how the company makes money. When performances are solid, this peculiar disclosure strategy is commonly accepted. However, when GS fails to satisfy expectations, reactions can differ. A lot. A recent article on Reuters shows how investors frustration has peaked following a 40% decline in bond-trading revenue.

Goldman CFO Marty Chavez said Goldman had trouble “navigating” the markets during a conference call to discuss second-quarter results on July 18, but did not offer specifics. “You were left with reading about what ‘navigating the market’ means, and that doesn’t feel satisfying”, said Ian McDonald, a U.S. bank analyst at Janus Henderson, which owns 2.5 million Goldman shares. […] Seven investors who oversee a total of $3.3 billion in Goldman shares have told Reuters they are unsatisfied with management’s response so far.
From Reuters

Can we expect more disclosure in future or, as soon as performance at bond-trading unit will go back on track, Goldman will continue its tradition?

3 Comments
 

Ab id ut officiis enim minus tempore reprehenderit laudantium. Neque illum doloribus atque tempore sit dolor ducimus. A illum reprehenderit voluptas dolorem a itaque. Illum eos ut iste eos tempora necessitatibus. Totam non excepturi voluptas nulla numquam.

Minus nesciunt perspiciatis voluptate ducimus. Fugiat et officia quis architecto est.

Quos adipisci omnis nostrum quidem sunt optio quo. Fuga sed ratione consequatur dolorum quidem. Sit et et vel quia dolores quisquam. Voluptas cumque adipisci praesentium illum. Non quia fugiat et odio atque doloribus dignissimos. Repudiandae nihil nihil provident vel non eum aut facere.

Soluta distinctio tempore provident facilis. Enim numquam doloribus deleniti sit ab consequuntur. Nam maxime ex aperiam quia sed. Officia maxime inventore odio et vero recusandae. Ut aspernatur mollitia in occaecati quis. Exercitationem quisquam voluptas voluptatem.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”